sealadaigh
Rookie
- Banned
- #1
The Palestinian Authority warned on Saturday that long-standing lack of movement toward peace with Israel was threatening the concept of a two-state solution and could lead to Palestinians being left in an Israeli-run "apartheid" state.
"The establishment of a politically and economically viable State of Palestine is impossible without ending the Israeli occupation of the whole West Bank and Gaza Strip, including East Jerusalem," the 22-page document, published on Saturday, said.
PA warns Israel logjam threatens statehood - Israel News, Ynetnews
israel really is in sort of a pickle here.
a two state solution means they have to give up certain areas that they are illegally occupying...
or they will have to accept a one state solution, which if they wish to continue the myth of "a beacon unto the nations of the world" and "the only democracy in the mideast", means they will have to give palestinians the vote and relinquish their long held hegemony over the indigenous arab population...
does anyone really wonder who benefits from maintaining the status quo and stalling on entering into negotiations for a solution to this conflict?
some may seriously want to carefully read the first line of article 2 in the link below, which includes language about "national group"s...
Convention on Genocide
"The establishment of a politically and economically viable State of Palestine is impossible without ending the Israeli occupation of the whole West Bank and Gaza Strip, including East Jerusalem," the 22-page document, published on Saturday, said.
PA warns Israel logjam threatens statehood - Israel News, Ynetnews
israel really is in sort of a pickle here.
a two state solution means they have to give up certain areas that they are illegally occupying...
or they will have to accept a one state solution, which if they wish to continue the myth of "a beacon unto the nations of the world" and "the only democracy in the mideast", means they will have to give palestinians the vote and relinquish their long held hegemony over the indigenous arab population...
does anyone really wonder who benefits from maintaining the status quo and stalling on entering into negotiations for a solution to this conflict?
some may seriously want to carefully read the first line of article 2 in the link below, which includes language about "national group"s...
Convention on Genocide