yidnar
Diamond Member
you are a liar!!my elctric bill is no higher than during Bush
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you are a liar!!my elctric bill is no higher than during Bush
you are a liar!!my elctric bill is no higher than during Bush
gas ,diesel,natural gas???you are a liar!!you are a liar!!my elctric bill is no higher than during Bush
again, you know not what you speak of.
it would be terrible to an Obama/Earth/human hater if we didn't let out all pollution available to destroy the ecological system, do u people eat mercury for lunch?
oh yeah, youtube and wiki are great sources of unaltered communication.
AH...so you do like cut and paste after all!
Here ya go then....
"And we must find a way to stop coal from polluting our atmosphere without pretending that our nation's most abundant energy source will just go away. It won't. It will also require taking steps to ensure that China's coal emissions are curbed as well. Already, some coal pollution from China's dirty plants is making its way to California. That's why we must invest in clean coal technologies that we can use at home and share with the world. Until those technologies are available, I will rely on the carbon cap and whatever tools are necessary to stop new dirty coal plants from being built in America - including a ban on new traditional coal facilities"
Existing U.S. Coal Plants - SourceWatchIn 2009, the Energy Information Administration listed 594 coal-fired power plants in the U.S., down from 645 coal-fired power plants in 2001.
The US lost more coal powered plants during Bush than Obama.
Among the impacts of coal plants are the fine particulates released directly or produced indirectly by sulfur dioxide emissions.[20] According to a 2004 study released by the Clean Air Task Force, fine particulates from power plants result in nearly 24,000 annual deaths, with 14 years lost on average for each death.[20] Based on social decisions in other contexts such as transportation and medicine, researchers report (see below) that American society is willing to spend $129,090 to avoid the loss of a year of life.[21] This suggests that society would be willing to spend at an additional $40 billion (i.e., 24,000 annual deaths x 14 years lost x $129,000 per year lost) for alternative ways of generating electricity that did not produce deadly pollution. With US coal plants generating about 2 billion Gigawatt hours annually, the expenditure of an additional $40 billion would raise the cost of electricity by about two cents per kilowatt hour.[22]
you are a liar!!my elctric bill is no higher than during Bush
again, you know not what you speak of.
Sounds like Obama's plan for jobs is not to have any.
Im sure the Stock market will ignore tid bits of info like this
Really.
Of course you probably support the FACT that the socialists, on their own admission, support the cooky environmental/global warming movement. Basicly an environmentalist is a commie!!it would be terrible to an Obama/Earth/human hater if we didn't let out all pollution available to destroy the ecological system, do u people eat mercury for lunch?