Tax cuts my ass.........

Discussion in 'Economy' started by manu1959, Aug 31, 2006.

  1. manu1959
    Offline

    manu1959 Left Coast Isolationist

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2004
    Messages:
    13,761
    Thanks Received:
    1,625
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    california
    Ratings:
    +1,626
    Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago and there was prosperity, absolutely no national debt, the largest middle class in the world and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.

    what the hell happened

    Tax his land,

    Tax his wage,

    Tax his bed in which he lays.

    Tax his tractor,

    Tax his mule,

    Teach him taxes are the rule.

    Tax his cow,

    Tax his goat,

    Tax his pants,

    Tax his coat.

    Tax his ties,

    Tax his shirts,

    Tax his work,

    Tax his dirt.

    Tax his tobacco,

    Tax his drink,

    Tax him if he tries to think.

    Tax his booze,

    Tax his beers,

    If he cries,

    Tax his tears.

    Tax his bills,

    Tax his gas,

    Tax his notes,

    Tax his cash.

    Tax him good and let him know

    That after taxes, he has no dough.

    If he hollers,

    Tax him more,

    Tax him until he's good and sore.

    Tax his coffin,

    Tax his grave,

    Tax the sod in which he lays.

    Put these words upon his tomb,

    "Taxes drove me to my doom!"

    And when he's gone,

    We won't relax,

    We'll still be after the inheritance TAX!!

    Accounts Receivable Tax,

    Building Permit Tax,

    CDL License Tax,

    Cigarette Tax,

    Corporate Income Tax,

    Dog License Tax,

    Federal Income Tax,

    Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA),

    Fishing License Tax,

    Food License Tax,

    Fuel Permit Tax,

    Gasoline Tax,

    Hunting License Tax,

    Inheritance Tax,

    Inventory Tax,

    IRS Interest Charges (tax on top of tax),

    IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax),

    Liquor Tax,

    Luxury Tax,

    Marriage License Tax,

    Medicare Tax,

    Property Tax,

    Real Estate Tax,

    Service charge taxes,

    Social Security Tax,

    Road Usage Tax (Truckers),

    Sales Taxes,

    Recreational Vehicle Tax,

    School Tax,

    State Income Tax,

    State Unemployment Tax (SUTA),

    Telephone Federal Excise Tax,

    Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax,

    Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Tax,

    Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax,

    Telephone Recurring and Non-recurring Charges

    Tax, Telephone State and Local Tax,

    Telephone Usage Charge Tax,

    Utility Tax,

    Vehicle License Registration Tax,

    Vehicle Sales Tax,

    Watercraft Registration Tax,

    Well Permit Tax,

    Workers Compensation Tax.

    as i said......... Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago and there was prosperity, absolutely no national debt, the largest middle class in the world and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.

    What the hell happened?????
     
  2. glockmail
    Offline

    glockmail BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Messages:
    7,700
    Thanks Received:
    433
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    The beautiful Yadkin Valley
    Ratings:
    +438
    It's called "The New Deal", courtesy of FDR.
     
  3. Hobbit
    Offline

    Hobbit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2004
    Messages:
    5,099
    Thanks Received:
    420
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Near Atlanta, GA
    Ratings:
    +421
    The worst part is that you don't see many of these taxes. We fork over billions every day in corporate income taxes in the form of higher prices, and the idiots who vote Democrat thank the politicians for the favor and ask for HIGHER corporate tax. Even then, the Democrats want it to be even worse.

    They want a higher inheritance tax. Essentially, they don't want any of your hard earned, ALREADY TAXED money to be used to pay for your prosperity's college, business expenses, house, or anything else. They use Paris Hilton as an example of how bad inheritance is, but without money, she'd just be a whore with no money. I mean, are we really saying that the entire fortunes of self-made multi-billionares, such as Sam Walton, must die with them?

    Before the contract with America unseated Democrat congressional power, the Democrats actually wanted to, get this, tax homeowners on the money they would be making if they rented out the house, minus their mortgage payment. Here's the way it works. You own a house and pay $600/month in mortgage payments. A government appraiser (who has no incentive to get it right) determines that, if you put your house up for rent, you could be getting $800/month. So, the government determines that you're saving $200/month by paying a mortgage instead of renting, and that $2400 (over 12 months) must be reported as income on your taxes.
     
  4. BaronVonBigmeat
    Offline

    BaronVonBigmeat Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,185
    Thanks Received:
    160
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +160
    I'd say the worst part is when businesses pass along the costs of taxes and people denounce them as greedy. Not only do politicians get the benefit of tax revenues, they get more political power and influence as people chase after the wrong target. It's bad enough that the politicians aren't being tarred and feathered and publicly horsewhipped for their shenannigans, but they actually get popular support for it.

    Oh and don't forget my favorite tax of all, the regressive and super-stealthy tax of money printing/inflation. There isn't one person in a thousand who will blame the government for higher prices instead of businessmen.
     
  5. pegwinn
    Offline

    pegwinn Top of the Food Chain

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2004
    Messages:
    2,549
    Thanks Received:
    329
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    Texas
    Ratings:
    +329
  6. Mr. P
    Offline

    Mr. P Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,329
    Thanks Received:
    618
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South of the Mason Dixon
    Ratings:
    +618
  7. musicman
    Offline

    musicman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2004
    Messages:
    5,171
    Thanks Received:
    533
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ratings:
    +533
    "And my advice to those who die

    declare the pennies on your eyes

    cause I'm the taxman - yeah I'm the taxman

    and you're working for no one but me".

    - George Harrison
     
  8. gonegolfin
    Offline

    gonegolfin Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    412
    Thanks Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +36
    No, you need to go back further than that. In 1913, 36 States had ratified the 16th Amendment to the Constitution. In October, Congress passed a new federal income tax law. This not so coincidentally coincided with the passage of the Federal Reserve Act that same year. On December 22, I might add, before a mostly absent Congress celebrating the Holidays with Family. Some of the bill's most vocal critics had already left Washington, assured that the significant differences between the house and senate versions would not be reconciled and voted on until the new year.

    What went wrong is that Congress and this country let the banking elite and the Wall Street Money Trust sieze control of our money in the form of the Federal Reserve, a Central Bank. Of course, a smokescreen was needed. Taxes were just that with a federal income tax leading the way. Ask yourself why taxes are needed?

    The government, via cooperation with the Federal Reserve (which is not a government entity, but a private banking cartel), can fund (and does) anything it desires simply by inflating the money supply. This is in large part how the government spends beyond its means today. It is also how the government (and other Central Banks) monetizes debt and other asset markets (yes, the stock market included). This should appall everyone.

    But if the government simply funded its projects by monetary inflation and without tax revenue, the public would be deeply suspicious and the masses would soon understand the fiat currency scheme. Such a system would not be allowed in the open as it allows politicians unbridled spending power that is not immediately evident in the form of price inflation. But with taxes, it can execute in stealth mode and as a result of obfuscation, very few understand how money really functions under a fiat system. Hence, reason #1 why taxes are needed is for reasons of stealth and misdirection. This does not even address the numerous advantages of banks controlling the supply of money.

    Reason #2 is that without a federal income tax, there would be no supporting reason (artificial as that reason may be) for a fiat currency. Federal income taxes are required to be paid in U.S. Dollars (fiat currency). Without the need to render payment of taxes in US Dollars, a fiat currency has no underlying intrinsic value.

    Brian
     
  9. glockmail
    Offline

    glockmail BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Messages:
    7,700
    Thanks Received:
    433
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    The beautiful Yadkin Valley
    Ratings:
    +438
    Interesting theory about the money supply. I must admit that I have little knowledge about how the system works. I'm not sure that its as corrupt as you appear to claim, but I do see huge advantages of a paper money system- based on the full faith and credit of the US- then the gold standard, which puts a severe restriction on the supply of money, hence the creation of wealth for middle America.
     
  10. BaronVonBigmeat
    Offline

    BaronVonBigmeat Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,185
    Thanks Received:
    160
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +160
    If we were on a "literal" gold standard--ie, no paper whatsoever, just jingly gold and silver coins in our pockets--that would create a problem, in that you wouldn't be able to pay small amounts as easily. A 1/20 oz. gold coin is tiny, but is still worth about half a day's pay for your average worker. Paper money (and copper or clad coins) can serve a useful purpose--namely, allowing for minute subdivisions of a scarce metal.

    The problem isn't paper money per se, it's how it's currently implemented. When you expand the supply, you aren't creating any wealth. Productivity improvements, free trade, clever new business plans, etc. do that...but not printing paper. It's just a wealth transfer: whoever prints it and spends it first gets the biggest benefit, whoever spends it second gets a lesser benefit, etc. whether banks or counterfeiters. Once it filters throughout the economy, ordinary workers have to deal with higher prices until their wages can catch up. And by the time they catch up, the process has begun again.

    Thus we see most households needing two workers to provide what one worker used to. This started about 35 years ago, coinciding with our final abandonment with the last vestiges of the gold standard. Really, with productivity improvements and so forth we ought to be better off now than 3 decades ago, we should really expect single-earner households (or early retirements) to be much more common than they were. It seems to me that this issue should be central in any discussion of "family values"--wouldn't it be easier to instill your values if both parents weren't forced to work?
     

Share This Page