Sweet Irony: the Other Side of Sexual Preference Discrimination

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by JBeukema, Jun 4, 2011.

  1. JBeukema
    Offline

    JBeukema BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2009
    Messages:
    25,613
    Thanks Received:
    1,703
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    everywhere and nowhere
    Ratings:
    +1,706
  2. xsited1
    Offline

    xsited1 Agent P

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    17,750
    Thanks Received:
    5,300
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    Little Rock, AR
    Ratings:
    +5,310
    A federal judge ruled that the organization does, indeed, have the constitutional right to limit the number of heterosexual players on each team? WTH??? This whole idea of 'protected classes' has got to go.
     
  3. FuelRod
    Offline

    FuelRod Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,387
    Thanks Received:
    920
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Ratings:
    +924
    [​IMG]
     
  4. JBeukema
    Offline

    JBeukema BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2009
    Messages:
    25,613
    Thanks Received:
    1,703
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    everywhere and nowhere
    Ratings:
    +1,706
    Would he have said the same is the NBL said 'No Gays' or 'Only one fag per team'?

    Methinks there'd be a million angry neolefties screaming about this if it were the other way around
     
  5. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist Feels Good! Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    24,131
    Thanks Received:
    5,251
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Ratings:
    +8,053
    Let me guess: The Bi-Sexual guys are the pitchers, and the Gays are the catchers right? :lol:
     
  6. C_Clayton_Jones
    Offline

    C_Clayton_Jones Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    41,561
    Thanks Received:
    8,948
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    In a Republic, actually
    Ratings:
    +23,956
    The judge’s ruling is consistent with Boy Scouts of America et al. v. Dale (2000), where the Court held compelling the BSA to allow gay scout leaders violates the organization’s freedom of association allowing private organizations to retain their unique composition.
     

Share This Page