jon_forward
Active Member
he must of over-medicated himself again...take a nap jones, you will feel better some shut eye...and loosen up the tin-foil
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by jones
SPIN SPIN SPIN, knew you could do it.
Only worked on yourself though!!!
Well, if you on the Left are going to make the charge that Bush called Iraq an imminent threat, then you should be able to produce the relevant quote. The burden of proof is on you, not us.
Originally posted by jimnyc
Thanks for confirming you haven't reached puberty yet. We all know what was said and what wasn't said. We just wanted to see if you were smart enough to find ONE link backing up your statements. Thanks for not letting us down.
Originally posted by jones
Find ME proof that we needed to start a pre-emptive war without a reason!!! Its unconstitutional to just go pre-empting everyone, expecially if there is NO IMMINENT THREAT!! JUST LIKE HITLER!! he said it was for freedom too!
Get a freaking clue u guys. Why did we goto Iraq then. to secure their oil? To topple an EEEEEVIL REGIME< How bout we send them to china too! They've done far faaar worse things to their people and you sit here talkin of IRAQ.
Thats as unamerican as you can get.
And why do you insist that it must be taken literally and claim its not true because they didn't say the exact words "imminent threat"?
What exactly did you want him to do? he supplied 14,000 pages of documents and destroyed some of the weapons he had. They were not even WMDs, just some old scuds that have regional capabilities beyond legal limit. He let all kinds of weapons inspectors into his country, what did they find? Probly some old botulism.If Saddam had wanted to comply, he had all kinds of times
"Leaving Saddam Hussein in possession of weapons of mass destruction for a more months or years is not an option, not in a post-September 11th world."
Originally posted by Aquarian
Well.... this post is about whether or not the administration called the threat imminent as well as whether or not it was indeed imminent. bartlett tacitly called it imminent by responding in the affirmative to the reporters question. Tenet says it was never considered by the cia to be imminent. up to us to shuffle thru the muck and decide what/who to believe.