Supreme Court says warrant necessary for phone location data in win for privacy

[Montrovant]

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday imposed limits on the ability of police to obtain cellphone data pinpointing the past location of criminal suspects in a major victory for digital privacy advocates and a setback for law enforcement authorities.

Supreme Court says Warrant Necessary for Phone Location Data in Win for Privacy
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh the fake liberals are going to feel such fear , now that their gov. parents aren't following them for their security.

This is GREAT NEWS!!

So our gobmint can't mine our cell data freely. But the Great Douche wants to let China and Russia to do so unrestricted.
Imagine that. But Facebook, Google, Apple, and Mircosoft has full access 24/7 already.
And they are not in LE.

This has been on going since 911 stupid ass. Can't blame Trump stupid fk moron.

That is a great characterization of your personality, MW.

This is a good ruling, liberals are cheering, and many cons and alt righties are having problems with the court's support of personal privacy.

Which "cons and alt righties" are those?

 

[Dana7360]

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday imposed limits on the ability of police to obtain cellphone data pinpointing the past location of criminal suspects in a major victory for digital privacy advocates and a setback for law enforcement authorities.

Supreme Court says Warrant Necessary for Phone Location Data in Win for Privacy
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh the fake liberals are going to feel such fear , now that their gov. parents aren't following them for their security.

This is GREAT NEWS!!

And once again you're way too lazy to see how the judges voted.

FOUR liberal judges voted in the majority to protect everyone's privacy rights.

ZERO liberal judges voted in the minority to allow Americans privacy to be violated.

FOUR conservatives judges voted in the minority to allow our government to violate our privacy rights.

ONE conservative judge voted in the majority to protect our rights.

If liberals wanted big government parents they would have voted to allow the government to violate our privacy rights.

Liberals did the opposite. To keep the conservative big government from being able to violate our privacy rights.

If it was true that conservatives don't want a big conservative government nanny watching everyone they would have voted with the liberals to protect your privacy rights.

The conservatives did the opposite.

It was every single one of the liberals on that court who were the ones looking out for yours and everyone else's rights.

It was only one conservative who did that.

It was FOUR conservatives who weren't looking out for you but were further creating a bigger conservative government nanny.

You have all four of those liberal judges to thank for this great news.

 

[Dana7360]

What four retards voted against needing a warrant to obtain cell phone information by the police?

Sometimes I have to question the intelligence of some of the justices... Perhaps it's time to set a minimum and maximum age for Supreme Court justices.... 60 being the max age. Clearly some of the justices are too old to understand how technology works and the importance of security and personal freedom.

That would be four of the five conservative judges. Including the one appointed by trump.

Their names are as follows:

Anthony Kennedy
Clerence Thomas
Samuel Alito
Neil Gorsch

None of the liberal judges on that court voted to violate our privacy rights.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Four con judges tried to take away your privacy rights, Americans.

 

[MindWars]

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday imposed limits on the ability of police to obtain cellphone data pinpointing the past location of criminal suspects in a major victory for digital privacy advocates and a setback for law enforcement authorities.

Supreme Court says Warrant Necessary for Phone Location Data in Win for Privacy
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh the fake liberals are going to feel such fear , now that their gov. parents aren't following them for their security.

This is GREAT NEWS!!

And once again you're way too lazy to see how the judges voted.

FOUR liberal judges voted in the majority to protect everyone's privacy rights.

ZERO liberal judges voted in the minority to allow Americans privacy to be violated.

FOUR conservatives judges voted in the minority to allow our government to violate our privacy rights.

ONE conservative judge voted in the majority to protect our rights.

If liberals wanted big government parents they would have voted to allow the government to violate our privacy rights.

Liberals did the opposite. To keep the conservative big government from being able to violate our privacy rights.

If it was true that conservatives don't want a big conservative government nanny watching everyone they would have voted with the liberals to protect your privacy rights.

The conservatives did the opposite.

It was every single one of the liberals on that court who were the ones looking out for yours and everyone else's rights.

It was only one conservative who did that.

It was FOUR conservatives who weren't looking out for you but were further creating a bigger conservative government nanny.

You have all four of those liberal judges to thank for this great news.

Once again you haven't got a clue who , what or why ........... keep dreaming.



THE JUDGES ARE NOT the point of the article.

 

[Montrovant]

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday imposed limits on the ability of police to obtain cellphone data pinpointing the past location of criminal suspects in a major victory for digital privacy advocates and a setback for law enforcement authorities.

Supreme Court says Warrant Necessary for Phone Location Data in Win for Privacy
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh the fake liberals are going to feel such fear , now that their gov. parents aren't following them for their security.

This is GREAT NEWS!!

And once again you're way too lazy to see how the judges voted.

FOUR liberal judges voted in the majority to protect everyone's privacy rights.

ZERO liberal judges voted in the minority to allow Americans privacy to be violated.

FOUR conservatives judges voted in the minority to allow our government to violate our privacy rights.

ONE conservative judge voted in the majority to protect our rights.

If liberals wanted big government parents they would have voted to allow the government to violate our privacy rights.

Liberals did the opposite. To keep the conservative big government from being able to violate our privacy rights.

If it was true that conservatives don't want a big conservative government nanny watching everyone they would have voted with the liberals to protect your privacy rights.

The conservatives did the opposite.

It was every single one of the liberals on that court who were the ones looking out for yours and everyone else's rights.

It was only one conservative who did that.

It was FOUR conservatives who weren't looking out for you but were further creating a bigger conservative government nanny.

You have all four of those liberal judges to thank for this great news.

Once again you haven't got a clue who , what or why ........... keep dreaming.

Who, what, or why....what? It certainly was the 4 supposedly liberal judges, along with Roberts, who voted in favor of greater privacy rights in this case.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The POINT is that the FOUR LIBERAL JUDGES vote for civil liberty and FOUR CON JUDGES voted for a POLICE STATE .