Stopping President Trump's Emergency Doesn't Need His Signature!

JimofPennsylvan

Platinum Member
Jun 6, 2007
855
494
910
It seems that a grave and shocking injustice is being perpetrated on the American by what is being proclaimed in the media that is needed to stop President Donald Trump's power grab in calling a national emergency and re-appropriating money for a southern border wall that Congress appropriated for other purposes. Media reports are setting the bar too high on what is needed to stop President Trump, the media is saying that what is needed is either a resolution passed by both chambers of Congress with the President signing the resolution or both chamber overriding a Presidential veto on the resolution. But if one actually reads the 1976 National emergencies act provisions they only say that each chamber of Congress must pass a concurrent resolution to terminate a Presidential emergency declaration; by definition a concurrent resolution does not need to be submitted to the President for his signature! It is readily achievable for the American people through their representatives in Congress to stop this Presidential power grab!
 
Did you demand the same of all previous Presidents that declared emergencies? If not, why not.
 
Did you demand the same of all previous Presidents that declared emergencies? If not, why not.


because....

NPCOrnage.jpg
 
Lucky that there's no emergency because the orange squatter is on yet another vacation, golfing, twitting, eating
 
Lucky that there's no emergency because the orange squatter is on yet another vacation, golfing, twitting, eating
King Obama declared 13 national emergencies during his regime. Did you demand or expect that he spend his life in a constant state of readiness?
You people are such petty assholes.
 
Did you demand the same of all previous Presidents that declared emergencies? If not, why not.

Because the previous emergencies weren't just a scam to deliver a stupid campaign promise that congress already said no to.
 
It seems that a grave and shocking injustice is being perpetrated on the American by what is being proclaimed in the media that is needed to stop President Donald Trump's power grab in calling a national emergency and re-appropriating money for a southern border wall that Congress appropriated for other purposes. Media reports are setting the bar too high on what is needed to stop President Trump, the media is saying that what is needed is either a resolution passed by both chambers of Congress with the President signing the resolution or both chamber overriding a Presidential veto on the resolution. But if one actually reads the 1976 National emergencies act provisions they only say that each chamber of Congress must pass a concurrent resolution to terminate a Presidential emergency declaration; by definition a concurrent resolution does not need to be submitted to the President for his signature! It is readily achievable for the American people through their representatives in Congress to stop this Presidential power grab!
"Grave and shocking injustice"?

I love watching a Drama Queen feign outrage.
 
Because the previous emergencies weren't just a scam to deliver a stupid campaign promise that congress already said no to.
You mean the previous emergencies that resulted in less than 5% of the cost and lives of Americans as illegal immigration?
 
Because the previous emergencies weren't just a scam to deliver a stupid campaign promise that congress already said no to.
You mean the previous emergencies that resulted in less than 5% of the cost and lives of Americans as illegal immigration?

You can't justify a stupid wall. Trump can't justify a stupid wall. Accept that.
 
Did you demand the same of all previous Presidents that declared emergencies? If not, why not.

Because the previous emergencies weren't just a scam to deliver a stupid campaign promise that congress already said no to.

Why did Obama declare emergencies? What were they?

If you have a point, then make it. If you really don't know what his emergencies were, then look it up.
 
You made the comment that the other emergencies weren’t scams. If you know so much about them, then show us what you know and why they were legitimate vs Trump’s. You made the comment, back it up. Prove to us it isn’t just more partisan bulls#it
Did you demand the same of all previous Presidents that declared emergencies? If not, why not.

Because the previous emergencies weren't just a scam to deliver a stupid campaign promise that congress already said no to.

Why did Obama declare emergencies? What were they?

If you have a point, then make it. If you really don't know what his emergencies were, then look it up.
 

Forum List

Back
Top