Discussion in 'Politics' started by The Original Tree, Mar 6, 2018.
"Both lawmakers said they didn’t know when or if a second counsel would be appointed at all."
Where is Christopher Steele?
No one should take you Syriusly.
You are just a Russian Stooge, like every other Russian Stooge on here.
There are a ton of people left out of that picture.
Like Clapper Brennan and the others I listed in my OP, but that's a good start.
One thing that everyone forgets is that The Clinton Campaign actually went to The Ukrainian Embassy to meet with Kremlin Agents, Fusion GPS, and other Bad Actors, to kick off the Russian Portion of the Dossier where they manufactured propaganda for The Clinton Campaign.
Ah, the adulterous lovers...
we talked about it, but "best" was not in terms of agents (though that's
what I wrote). It's about what the best outcome is.
Do you or Bill fundamentally believe that 3 and 3 is the RIGHT thing for
the case? If the answer is no, then you call back and say we're good
as is. You have never wavered from saying 2 and 2 is best. I don't get
what the hesitation is now...
One more thing: she might be our next president. The last thing you
need us going in there loaded for bear. You think she's going to
remember or care that it was more doj than fbi?
Agreed. I called Bill and relayed what we discussed. He agrees. I will
email you and same.
Cool. You going to call back? I have one more thing to say, so long as
you are out of earshot of folks.
Sorry meeting went long with Bill. So is covering 10 and my 11
Who is this “Bill” they keep mentioning in these texts?
The ONLY way this happens is if powers that be think that the "little people", ie us, need a bone to keep us docile just a little bit longer.
............................................................................................................................................... The Grassley-Graham letter states that Steele admitted in a British court that included in the dossier is “unsolicited — and unverified — allegations.”
The FBI Hand Behind Russia-gate
Special Report: In the Watergate era, liberals warned about U.S. intelligence agencies manipulating U.S. politics, but now Trump-hatred has blinded many of them to this danger becoming real, as ex-CIA analyst Ray McGovern notes.
By Ray McGovern
..."So, on Jan. 6, 2017, President Obama’s Director of National Intelligence James Clapper released an evidence-free report that he said was compiled by “hand-picked” analysts from the CIA, FBI and NSA, offering an “assessment” that Russia and President Putin were behind the release of the Democratic emails in a plot to help Trump win the presidency.
Despite the extraordinary gravity of the charge, even New York Times correspondent Scott Shane noted that proof was lacking. He wrote at the time: “What is missing from the [the Jan. 6] public report is what many Americans most eagerly anticipated: hard evidence to back up the agencies’ claims that the Russian government engineered the election attack. … Instead, the message from the agencies essentially amounts to ‘trust us.’”"...
Ed MorrisseyPosted at 12:01 pm on March 6, 2018 from hotair.com
“The Clintons’ tentacles go everywhere. So, that’s why it’s important,” said Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) chairman of a House Oversight and Government Reform subcommittee that has been taking an increasingly visible role defending the Trump administration in the Russia probe. “We continue to get new information every week it seems that sort of underscores the fact that the FBI hasn’t been square with us.”
Separate names with a comma.