Speaking of Stereotypes...

We know what happened after that though. The whites in the north felt the south had been adequately punished so they took back the land they had given to the ex slaves and gave it to the former slave owners. Then they vacated the south and let the inbred whites take back over.

A little history lesson:

Presidential Election of 1876

The Democrats agreed to let the Republicans keep the White House in return for ending Reconstruction and letting the Democrats enact Jim Crow laws throughout the South.

The racist inbred southerners were Dems and they were white. Did you just find that out?

YOU said "The whites in the north felt the south had been adequately punished so they took back the land they had given to the ex slaves."

This is incorrect: The Republicans wanted to keep the White House, so they ended Reconstruction. Then the Democrats took back the rights that had been given to the ex slaves.

Do you always get so pissy when you are corrected?
 
We know what happened after that though. The whites in the north felt the south had been adequately punished so they took back the land they had given to the ex slaves and gave it to the former slave owners. Then they vacated the south and let the inbred whites take back over.

A little history lesson:

Presidential Election of 1876

The Democrats agreed to let the Republicans keep the White House in return for ending Reconstruction and letting the Democrats enact Jim Crow laws throughout the South.

The racist inbred southerners were Dems and they were white. Did you just find that out?

YOU said "The whites in the north felt the south had been adequately punished so they took back the land they had given to the ex slaves."

This is incorrect: The Republicans wanted to keep the White House, so they ended Reconstruction. Then the Democrats took back the rights that had been given to the ex slaves.

Do you always get so pissy when you are corrected?
You didnt correct anything. You just agreed with me but put a different spin on reality. The reality being that the north was salivating to get back to making money. The point was that white people supported other whites so they could keep Black people from out competing whites. They honestly tricked themselves into believing Blacks couldnt succeed and when they did it caused such cognitive dissonance whites had to turn to Jim Crow, Vagrancy laws, Voting restrictions, etc etc in order to keep Blacks down.

Its amusing because I was never fooled. If you are really superior you dont have to handicap the people that you consider inferior.
 
We know what happened after that though. The whites in the north felt the south had been adequately punished so they took back the land they had given to the ex slaves and gave it to the former slave owners. Then they vacated the south and let the inbred whites take back over.

A little history lesson:

Presidential Election of 1876

The Democrats agreed to let the Republicans keep the White House in return for ending Reconstruction and letting the Democrats enact Jim Crow laws throughout the South.

The racist inbred southerners were Dems and they were white. Did you just find that out?

YOU said "The whites in the north felt the south had been adequately punished so they took back the land they had given to the ex slaves."

This is incorrect: The Republicans wanted to keep the White House, so they ended Reconstruction. Then the Democrats took back the rights that had been given to the ex slaves.

Do you always get so pissy when you are corrected?
You didnt correct anything. You just agreed with me but put a different spin on reality. The reality being that the north was salivating to get back to making money. The point was that white people supported other whites so they could keep Black people from out competing whites. They honestly tricked themselves into believing Blacks couldnt succeed and when they did it caused such cognitive dissonance whites had to turn to Jim Crow, Vagrancy laws, Voting restrictions, etc etc in order to keep Blacks down.

Its amusing because I was never fooled. If you are really superior you dont have to handicap the people that you consider inferior.


afrian americans can't out compete anyone
 
We know what happened after that though. The whites in the north felt the south had been adequately punished so they took back the land they had given to the ex slaves and gave it to the former slave owners. Then they vacated the south and let the inbred whites take back over.

A little history lesson:

Presidential Election of 1876

The Democrats agreed to let the Republicans keep the White House in return for ending Reconstruction and letting the Democrats enact Jim Crow laws throughout the South.

The racist inbred southerners were Dems and they were white. Did you just find that out?

YOU said "The whites in the north felt the south had been adequately punished so they took back the land they had given to the ex slaves."

This is incorrect: The Republicans wanted to keep the White House, so they ended Reconstruction. Then the Democrats took back the rights that had been given to the ex slaves.

Do you always get so pissy when you are corrected?
You didnt correct anything. You just agreed with me but put a different spin on reality. The reality being that the north was salivating to get back to making money. The point was that white people supported other whites so they could keep Black people from out competing whites. They honestly tricked themselves into believing Blacks couldnt succeed and when they did it caused such cognitive dissonance whites had to turn to Jim Crow, Vagrancy laws, Voting restrictions, etc etc in order to keep Blacks down.

Its amusing because I was never fooled. If you are really superior you dont have to handicap the people that you consider inferior.


afrian americans can't out compete anyone
All of them have already left you behind in the zoo enclosure,
 
If blacks had the right to vote since the mid 1800's, then why was it necessary for LBJ to pass the Civil Rights Act in 1964, and the Voting Rights Act in 1965?
 
Delicious Debate: Antisocialism

What we need is better storytelling about multi-racial marriages.

I mean, all we have now is Beauty and the Beast (and I don't think black men want to be referred to as the Beast).

What else is there? Jungle Fever (Spike Lee)? Romeo and Juliet (William Shakespeare)?

That's not good enough...

We need more 'iconic' multi-racial love stories that people feel more easygoing about referencing for social (and hence, hopefully, cultural-political) discussions. If we care about how minorities vote, we have to care about how minorities *pray.*




engagement.jpg
 
If we care about how someone votes, we DON'T have to care about how they worship.

Politics and religion should never mix, because then it leads to a theocracy.

Want this nation ruled by a bunch of Christians who will persecute anyone who isn't? I don't.
 
African-Americans represent one of the most monolithic voting groups in the U.S. with over 90% voting for Democrats. In this case, perception and reality are virtually the same. If they want to combat stereotypes, they need to stop acting in accordance with them. Comprende?

What does the Republican Party have to offer blacks? Nada.
 
African-Americans represent one of the most monolithic voting groups in the U.S. with over 90% voting for Democrats. In this case, perception and reality are virtually the same. If they want to combat stereotypes, they need to stop acting in accordance with them. Comprende?

What does the Republican Party have to offer blacks? ....



The same things offered to all Americans.
 

Forum List

Back
Top