Sorry my fellow conservatives, I side with the SCOTUS' decision.

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by PredFan, Jun 29, 2012.

  1. PredFan
    Offline

    PredFan Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2011
    Messages:
    29,190
    Thanks Received:
    4,422
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    In Liberal minds, rent free.
    Ratings:
    +11,619
    They were right by saying it isn't Constitutional under the Commerce Clause, and they are right that it is a tax and therefor is constitutional.

    Don't get me wrong, Obamacare is a BAD bill and will ruin the economy and healthcare, but the damage was done when we elected obama as POTUS and not when the justices correctly enterpreted the Constitution.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Amelia
    Offline

    Amelia BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Messages:
    21,830
    Thanks Received:
    5,105
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Packerland!
    Ratings:
    +5,119


    It it was a tax, then the court should have rejected the case and said come back when the tax goes into effect, right?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  3. Moonglow
    Online

    Moonglow Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    81,438
    Thanks Received:
    7,982
    Trophy Points:
    1,870
    Location:
    sw mizzouri
    Ratings:
    +29,298
    is it time for mass suicide?
     
  4. The Rabbi
    Offline

    The Rabbi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    67,619
    Thanks Received:
    7,821
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Nashville
    Ratings:
    +18,214
    The administration and the democrats denied it was a tax. They denied it vehemently. They said in no uncertain terms it was not a tax. The statute does not call it a tax.
    Roberts had to rewrite the statute to call it a tax before allowing it.
    That is no way to run a court.
     
  5. The Rabbi
    Offline

    The Rabbi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    67,619
    Thanks Received:
    7,821
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Nashville
    Ratings:
    +18,214
    Right after Election Day and the Dems get shellacked again.
     
  6. Dante
    Offline

    Dante On leave Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    52,463
    Thanks Received:
    3,324
    Trophy Points:
    1,825
    Location:
    On leave
    Ratings:
    +6,054
    1) Good for you.

    2) Your opinion is overly alarmist.

    you have earned the respect of Dante.

    :cool:


    :thewave:
     
  7. Dante
    Offline

    Dante On leave Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    52,463
    Thanks Received:
    3,324
    Trophy Points:
    1,825
    Location:
    On leave
    Ratings:
    +6,054
    Obama's Solicitor General and others insisted they get to argue it as a tax. So bwahahaha!


    How they argued it is a matter of legal strategy. No one lied.

    :cuckoo:
     
  8. Dante
    Offline

    Dante On leave Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    52,463
    Thanks Received:
    3,324
    Trophy Points:
    1,825
    Location:
    On leave
    Ratings:
    +6,054
    nope.


    next
     
  9. signelect
    Offline

    signelect BANNED

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,863
    Thanks Received:
    216
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Ratings:
    +216
    None of the justices or the congress are impacted by this law because the have passed their own plan. This is congress and the SC saying screw you, you don't count. Next case please.
     
  10. PredFan
    Offline

    PredFan Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2011
    Messages:
    29,190
    Thanks Received:
    4,422
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    In Liberal minds, rent free.
    Ratings:
    +11,619
    Ask the judges. I'm just saying that upholding it was the correct interpretation of the Constitution, and that the damage was done 3 1/2 years ago. The blame for this terrible bill lies with the voters and not the SCOTUS.
     

Share This Page