EdwardBaiamonte
Platinum Member
- Nov 23, 2011
- 34,612
- 2,153
- 1,100
Of course, you need the opportunity to make profits.
liberals despise profits and see them as the product of greed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course, you need the opportunity to make profits.
Obviously they know about about????? You make no sense, again.Ed, perhaps you should let the Chinese government officials know of this switch.
obviously they know about about since they switched course 100% in 1979!!! See why we say a liberal will be very very slow????
That you are a tea party tool. Capable of only the information that you want to believe. Simple, ed.Economies generally grow fastest under socialist control, or some other system of central planning.
yes and Florida/ CUba is a good example or east/west germany or Israel before and after 1999, or the USSR or Vietnam under communism.
See why we are 100% positive a liberal will be an idiot!!! Sorry but what explanation is possible????
But, ed, profits happen because of demand.
I know many liberals. And I know none that despise profits. You just continue to blather. More tea party dogma.Of course, you need the opportunity to make profits.
liberals despise profits and see them as the product of greed.
Ed,thats like saying here is a Yugo, and now you understand automobiles. Really simple, ed, there is a lot more to capitalism than that basic definition. You just described barter, in the most basic and simple economy, which may be perfectly capitalistic.If that is all that there is to it, then what is Canada? What is Germany? What is most of Europe for that matter.What you have defined is nothing.
if one farmer agrees to peacefully and voluntarily exchange some his wheat for some of his neighbors corn they have conducted quintessential capitalism. The more the government introduces liberal force or violence primarily with taxes, regulations, confiscations, the less capitalism there is. THe USA has the most capitalism and wealth, Europe has less, and Cuba has the least. Is that really over your head??
NOw even you can understand what capitalism is.
If you believe the Chinese economy is capitalist, .
Really simple, ed, there is a lot more to capitalism than that basic definition.
I know many liberals. And I know none that despise profits. You just continue to blather. More tea party dogma.Of course, you need the opportunity to make profits.
liberals despise profits and see them as the product of greed.
This is your evidence??? Blogs and the American Spectator. Maybe i should send you some quotes from Move On.I know many liberals. And I know none that despise profits. You just continue to blather. More tea party dogma.liberals despise profits and see them as the product of greed.
Why do liberals hate profit? - Yahoo! Answersanswers.yahoo.com ... All Categories Politics & Government PoliticsCached - Similar
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
29 answers - Jul 15, 2009
Top answer: Without profit there is no incentive to invest or operate a business AT ALL. Why do you think all American companies downsize and quickly go out of ...
Why do liberals hate big business do much?* - 12 answers - Mar 28, 2012
Why do liberals hate corporations, but place blind ...* - 8 answers - Feb 14, 2012
Why do liberals hate corporate profits?* - 14 answers - Apr 22, 2011
Why do people hate for profit colleges?* - 3 answers - Nov 2, 2010
More results from answers.yahoo.com »
Get more discussion results
Katy Bushway: Why do liberals hate profit?katybushway.blogspot.com/2012/01/why-do-liberals-hate-profit.htmlCached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Jan 17, 2012 Liberals only hate profits that do not benefit their pockets or send votes their way. Let's put it this way, liberals like Al Gore (whose father made a ...
The American Spectator : The Liberals' Reality Problemspectator.org/archives/2011/08/23/the-liberals-reality-problemCached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Aug 23, 2011 Slight correction if I may....liberals hate the profit motive in others...especially those on the other side of the political aisle..while they themselves
If you think capitalism is fully described by a 5 word sentence, then you will not understand, ed. You are a true waste of space.Really simple, ed, there is a lot more to capitalism than that basic definition.
if so why be so afraid to tell us what??????????? What does your fear tell you??
Well, Ed, I just took you at your word. You stated that things went really well for china when they became a capitalist economy. Here is a copy and paste of your statement: China just switched to it and now has fastest longest sustained growth in human history!!If you believe the Chinese economy is capitalist, .
dear no economy is capitalist!!! China took a giant step toward capitalism in 1979 and that made all the difference.!!
The easiest things are over your head!! Why waste your time here??
U.S.'s Startup Myth; China's 'Ford Moment': Commentary Review ...
Jul 3, 2010... may have to go Communist. It's tempting to wonder which way China will go. ... So far, China has taken the first path, going more the way of capitalism than Communism. ... Krugman or Paulson: Who You Gonna Bet On? ...
www.businessweek.com/news/2010-07-03/u-s-s-startup-my... - Similar
The Myth of Asia's Miracle
Paul Krugman* ... Communist growth rates were certainly impressive, but not magical. ..... unfair: one is weighing down the buoyant performance of Chinese capitalism with the leaden performance of Chinese socialism. ... Even a modest slowing in China's growth will change the geopolitical outlook substantially. ...
web.mit.edu/krugman/www/myth.html - Similar
Consequently, he has instituted many ill-advised 'innovations' that a stockholder might view as positive
the beauty of capitalism is that the only thing stockholders view as positive is earnings!!
even minimal unemployment benefits are "a form of welfare"UE is not welfare.
Lincoln was a politician, campaigning for office, by flattering people's Pride. Logically, Capital (machines, factories) are not the product of blue-collar labor. Instead, they are the intellectual products, of innovative entrepreneurs. For example,Lincoln said much the same in 1861...
"Labor is prior to and independent of capital.
"Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration."
liberals despise profits and see them as the product of greed.
stereotypically, blue-collar points to the Greed of white-collars for "profits", for which they themselves are Envious. Nobody minds their business being profitable, when those profits accrue to themselves, in higher wages. Finger-pointing appears to be a case of "best defense is a good offense", behind which everybody acts more-than-less the sameI know many liberals. And I know none that despise profits.
Consequently, he has instituted many ill-advised 'innovations' that a stockholder might view as positive
the beauty of capitalism is that the only thing stockholders view as positive is earnings!!
The 'wise' investor tries to determine whether a company has future potential. My point is that investors usually have no real clue about how to actually produce anything and what sounds to them like potiential improvements in a business are frequently smoke and mirrors.
And the ceo's and upper management deserve no credit for the production from which they benefit.General blue-collar laborers deserve zero credit, for those innovations, from which they have benefited
******according to liberals this is not true, labor buys or demands innovations like cars so they are the essential part of the formula. Henry Ford is not more valuable than the guy who screws on the tires and buys the car with his paycheck.
And the ceo's and upper management deserve no credit for the production from which they benefit.
Productive labor, earning wages, makes the markets, for innovators to sell to. Without customers, nobody could sell anything.General blue-collar laborers deserve zero credit, for those innovations, from which they have benefited
******according to liberals this is not true, labor buys or demands innovations like cars so they are the essential part of the formula. Henry Ford is not more valuable than the guy who screws on the tires and buys the car with his paycheck.