Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Look at all the failures he has had his first two years as a president supported by a democratic congress. Lets face it. The American people were duped by this guy who obviously wasn't properly vetted. How could a candidate promise so much and not deliver. What were his qualifications to make such promises and bring Hope & Change? Think about it folks. What kind of vetting process should we have for these candidates who want to bring prosperity for America and its citizens? Obama has proven that the vetting process doesn't work when selecting a president.
Obama has been a pretty good president.
Health care reform, Wall Street reform, the restoration of American prestige abroad, the return of science without political influence, the rescue of the American economy, and various foreign policy successes....all in all a pretty good record.
His only failure is he has been too soft on the Republican Party.
Why don't we make all politicians fill out a universal application like you would for any job. If at any time it has been found that they lied on the application they would be fired (removed from office) just like regular people are if they lie on an application. While we are at it they must submit DNA and undergo drug testing to check for criminal acitivity or drug usage. But I guess that is too much, many of our government employees don't have to even submit to drug testing unless there is cause.
Why don't we make all politicians fill out a universal application like you would for any job. If at any time it has been found that they lied on the application they would be fired (removed from office) just like regular people are if they lie on an application. While we are at it they must submit DNA and undergo drug testing to check for criminal acitivity or drug usage. But I guess that is too much, many of our government employees don't have to even submit to drug testing unless there is cause.
That..would have possibly disqualified Bush. Probably the only president convicted of a crime prior to assuming office.
The president has failed. Look at his poll numbers and look at the economy. He was not fit for the job. He had no executive experience.Since the President has not failed the question is moot.
The real question should be "Have the pseudo-conservatives fooled enough Americans to return them to power?"
How long should it have taken to fix the economy? Since he's failed you must have some expert knowledge of how long a competent leader would have fixed the economy from the way it was when he took office. Please enlighten us.
Look at all the failures he has had his first two years as a president supported by a democratic congress. Lets face it. The American people were duped by this guy who obviously wasn't properly vetted. How could a candidate promise so much and not deliver. What were his qualifications to make such promises and bring Hope & Change? Think about it folks. What kind of vetting process should we have for these candidates who want to bring prosperity for America and its citizens? Obama has proven that the vetting process doesn't work when selecting a president.
Look at all the failures he has had his first two years as a president supported by a democratic congress. Lets face it. The American people were duped by this guy who obviously wasn't properly vetted. How could a candidate promise so much and not deliver. What were his qualifications to make such promises and bring Hope & Change? Think about it folks. What kind of vetting process should we have for these candidates who want to bring prosperity for America and its citizens? Obama has proven that the vetting process doesn't work when selecting a president.
Look at all the failures he has had his first two years as a president supported by a democratic congress. Lets face it. The American people were duped by this guy who obviously wasn't properly vetted. How could a candidate promise so much and not deliver. What were his qualifications to make such promises and bring Hope & Change? Think about it folks. What kind of vetting process should we have for these candidates who want to bring prosperity for America and its citizens? Obama has proven that the vetting process doesn't work when selecting a president.
All we need is a press that actually does it's job. Instead of actively working to hide a candidates flaws and get him elected.
Look at all the failures he has had his first two years as a president supported by a democratic congress. Lets face it. The American people were duped by this guy who obviously wasn't properly vetted. How could a candidate promise so much and not deliver. What were his qualifications to make such promises and bring Hope & Change? Think about it folks. What kind of vetting process should we have for these candidates who want to bring prosperity for America and its citizens? Obama has proven that the vetting process doesn't work when selecting a president.
All we need is a press that actually does it's job. Instead of actively working to hide a candidates flaws and get him elected.
That's the Bushremorse speaking.
All we need is a press that actually does it's job. Instead of actively working to hide a candidates flaws and get him elected.
That's the Bushremorse speaking.
What is that suppose to mean? I was happy to see Bush go.
Are you saying the Liberal Press didn't give Obama a pass, and basically campaign for him?
That's the Bushremorse speaking.
What is that suppose to mean? I was happy to see Bush go.
Are you saying the Liberal Press didn't give Obama a pass, and basically campaign for him?
The press gave them both a pass and refused to dig up anything on either of em.
Minimum Constitutional requirements? Why not the maximum?I don't believe there should be any vetting process other than making sure that the candidate meets the minimum constitutional requirements.
The issue is not that Obama ran for office. He has that right. The issue is the people who voted for him. How many of them really studied the issues? How many of them really scrutinized the promises he made? How many of them tried to distinguish pie-in-the-sky promises from realistic expectations?
And, at the risk of sounding racist, I think a major part of it was to put a Black man in office just to make history.
This is what it's all about. There's nothing wrong with the system; it's an example of what happens when people allow emotions rather than reason to drive their decisions. The country was tired of Bush (or believed it was tired of him!), and I think the votes fell into two major categories: put a Black man in office and vote for anyone who is NOT like Bush.
It's too easy to blame the media for that. I don't disagree that the news media prejudiced its coverage. But it all boils down to the person in the voting booth making a responsible decision.
Look at all the failures he has had his first two years as a president supported by a democratic congress. Lets face it. The American people were duped by this guy who obviously wasn't properly vetted. How could a candidate promise so much and not deliver. What were his qualifications to make such promises and bring Hope & Change? Think about it folks. What kind of vetting process should we have for these candidates who want to bring prosperity for America and its citizens? Obama has proven that the vetting process doesn't work when selecting a president.