Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. Political affiliation should not, IMO, be a protected class. It should not be so because all it takes to have a political affiliation is ticking a box on a form. That's about as durable as a hairstyle.I was reading that California has declared political affiliation to be a protected class with regards to anti-discrimination legislation. Seems kind of crazy to me. What do you all think?
No. Political affiliation should not, IMO, be a protected class. It should not be so because all it takes to have a political affiliation is ticking a box on a form. That's about as durable as a hairstyle.I was reading that California has declared political affiliation to be a protected class with regards to anti-discrimination legislation. Seems kind of crazy to me. What do you all think?
Inasmuch as you've asked that question -- and I'm not chiding you for asking it; I respect that you don't understand what I meant and want to understand -- and inasmuch as I don't right now care to be didactic enough to explain it, we're done conversing on the matter.No. Political affiliation should not, IMO, be a protected class. It should not be so because all it takes to have a political affiliation is ticking a box on a form. That's about as durable as a hairstyle.I was reading that California has declared political affiliation to be a protected class with regards to anti-discrimination legislation. Seems kind of crazy to me. What do you all think?
What does durability have to do with anything?
FWIW, you may find one or more of the following documents helpful in obtaining an understanding of what durability has to do with it.Inasmuch as you've asked that question -- and I'm not chiding you for asking it; I respect that you don't understand what I meant and want to understand -- and inasmuch as I don't right now care to be didactic enough to explain it, we're done conversing on the matter.No. Political affiliation should not, IMO, be a protected class. It should not be so because all it takes to have a political affiliation is ticking a box on a form. That's about as durable as a hairstyle.I was reading that California has declared political affiliation to be a protected class with regards to anti-discrimination legislation. Seems kind of crazy to me. What do you all think?
What does durability have to do with anything?
Sure, as long as I'm on the committee that decides which political affiliations get protected. jk lol.
"protected class" is one of the most discriminatory terms that have ever came from our govt.
I was reading that California has declared political affiliation to be a protected class with regards to anti-discrimination legislation. Seems kind of crazy to me. What do you all think?
I was reading that California has declared political affiliation to be a protected class with regards to anti-discrimination legislation. Seems kind of crazy to me. What do you all think?
if we are going to have protected classes at all, I say extend them as far as you can. Maybe it will bring the whole thing crashing down sooner rather than later.
I was reading that California has declared political affiliation to be a protected class with regards to anti-discrimination legislation. Seems kind of crazy to me. What do you all think?
if we are going to have protected classes at all, I say extend them as far as you can. Maybe it will bring the whole thing crashing down sooner rather than later.
It might crash eventually, but it's creating a totalitarian state in the process. Not anything I want my kids to live through.
I was reading that California has declared political affiliation to be a protected class with regards to anti-discrimination legislation. Seems kind of crazy to me. What do you all think?
if we are going to have protected classes at all, I say extend them as far as you can. Maybe it will bring the whole thing crashing down sooner rather than later.
It might crash eventually, but it's creating a totalitarian state in the process. Not anything I want my kids to live through.
We are already on our way, extending protected classes is the least of our concerns.
I was reading that California has declared political affiliation to be a protected class with regards to anti-discrimination legislation. Seems kind of crazy to me. What do you all think?
if we are going to have protected classes at all, I say extend them as far as you can. Maybe it will bring the whole thing crashing down sooner rather than later.
It might crash eventually, but it's creating a totalitarian state in the process. Not anything I want my kids to live through.
We are already on our way, extending protected classes is the least of our concerns.
I disagree. It's these wedge issues that inflict the most damage. They set precedent and undermine free society.
I was reading that California has declared political affiliation to be a protected class with regards to anti-discrimination legislation. Seems kind of crazy to me. What do you all think?
if we are going to have protected classes at all, I say extend them as far as you can. Maybe it will bring the whole thing crashing down sooner rather than later.
It might crash eventually, but it's creating a totalitarian state in the process. Not anything I want my kids to live through.
We are already on our way, extending protected classes is the least of our concerns.
I disagree. It's these wedge issues that inflict the most damage. They set precedent and undermine free society.
The problem is that once you go the whole protected class thing, you have to go all in or it gets used as a bludgeon to suppress people and things you don't like, as long as they are not protected.
In for a penny, in for a pound.
if we are going to have protected classes at all, I say extend them as far as you can. Maybe it will bring the whole thing crashing down sooner rather than later.
It might crash eventually, but it's creating a totalitarian state in the process. Not anything I want my kids to live through.
We are already on our way, extending protected classes is the least of our concerns.
I disagree. It's these wedge issues that inflict the most damage. They set precedent and undermine free society.
The problem is that once you go the whole protected class thing, you have to go all in or it gets used as a bludgeon to suppress people and things you don't like, as long as they are not protected.
In for a penny, in for a pound.
It'll be a good deal heavier than that.
I've been down this bunny hole before (figuratively), with liberals who want to claim that all discrimination should be outlawed. They seriously don't see a problem with it.