- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,519
- 2,165
- Banned
- #21
The court in open sessions should enforce the mother in telling her sons who their real fathers may be.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So the guy is the prick? What about the mother and why should she get spousal support and the house till kids are 18.Why not guy get house and kids and should the real father not be on the hook? How about this for a question. I took an app for a mortage loan from a lady two years ago and she was collecting $20,000 in child support from four different doctors. Does she need 20k per month and for what? I would imagine he hates the wife. She ruined his life This guys net to debt was out rageouse. He has about fifty bucks a week to live on after spousal,child support and rent. I could not get him financed for his own place even with 700+ beacon and 6300 PER MONTH INCOME. Of course right wingers have no empathy till it is them that is getting F'ed.Why is the guy being such a prick?As long as he was married to his wife, and living in the same home....her kids were his kids and he was responsible for the household....the kids know no other father than the man who acted and lived the part as their father....
Does this man now hate his kids that he reared so much that child support for them for a couple of years till they hit 18 is something outrageous... now that he knows that they are not biologically his? Really?
The whole situation does suck wind, but the two boys did nothing wrong....
How could you not love kids you raised for 18 years?
Do not know how he found out. His name is on birth certificate. A DNA test was taken, what caused suspision I do not know! Does it realy matter? This is not an isolated incedence happens all over the US and Canada with varying details.A few years later they have a child. A short period after they have another child. Fast forward and the kids are 17 and 15. The man learns neither child is actually his. They divorce and she gets spousal support and child support even though the kids are not his.
Spousal support is limited usually to a time frame. How did he learn that neither child is his? Is his name still on their birth certificates?
The man has an obligation to his childrenSo the guy is the prick? What about the mother and why should she get spousal support and the house till kids are 18.Why not guy get house and kids and should the real father not be on the hook? How about this for a question. I took an app for a mortage loan from a lady two years ago and she was collecting $20,000 in child support from four different doctors. Does she need 20k per month and for what? I would imagine he hates the wife. She ruined his life This guys net to debt was out rageouse. He has about fifty bucks a week to live on after spousal,child support and rent. I could not get him financed for his own place even with 700+ beacon and 6300 PER MONTH INCOME. Of course right wingers have no empathy till it is them that is getting F'ed.Why is the guy being such a prick?As long as he was married to his wife, and living in the same home....her kids were his kids and he was responsible for the household....the kids know no other father than the man who acted and lived the part as their father....
Does this man now hate his kids that he reared so much that child support for them for a couple of years till they hit 18 is something outrageous... now that he knows that they are not biologically his? Really?
The whole situation does suck wind, but the two boys did nothing wrong....
How could you not love kids you raised for 18 years?
Again: she can simply claim she doesn't remember.The court in open sessions should enforce the mother in telling her sons who their real fathers may be.
"It was a one-night stand 15 years ago. It was a guy who went by Chuck...I forget his last name." You going to hire a mind reader?
Or she just makes something up, either naming someone who is dead, or putting someone ELSE through hell.
.....
And anyway, if the husband was getting his regular provision of nookie, he shouldn't complain. ....
So a couple gets married A few years later they have a child. A short period after they have another child. Fast forward and the kids are 17 and 15. The man learns neither child is actually his. They divorce and she gets spousal support and child support even though the kids are not his. This poor shlep is now 55 years old, to old in his mind to have kids as at this point if he got some one pregnant today he would be 75 when they(the kid) turned twenty. He is not only robbed of all the years he could have had an actual family of his own, but is left with the realization that he will leave no blood heirs. Is this right ?
Yes the biological Father’s should be made to pay child support.Should laws not be fair and just? Shouldn't the wife be forced to devulge real fathers name? Should real father not be liable for all the years with no support. With a good percentager of that support going to the guy that actually paid. Wife having to move in my mind is not enough of a penalty. She moves and problem solved. The poor 55 year old guy also is not living in his former home of oer twenty years.The court will probably recognize him as the 'father' for legal records.
If he has worked to have a good relationship with 'his' children, matters should work out.
The fairness of the issue is something else, of course.
We had a similar matter happen at Crown Colony, and the wives there made sure that the woman had no social life whatsoever in a community where she had once been a valued member. She and her new husband sold out and moved within a year.
At this point, he should consider skipping the country.Too bad. If he has been the father up till now and wants out because he's a stupid moron, too late. The court puts the kids first, and the kids think he's the dad...it doesn't matter why they think that. If they think he's their dad and he has been behaving as their dad, he gets the responsibility of paying.