Senator Graham Likely Knows That "Abuse of Power" Is A Crime, (Even In South Carolina)!

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
"It's beginning to look like a Crime Scene, everywhere Trump Goes!" And that's not just about where he Tweets from, and at what hours of the morning(?)!

Texas has a giant Section 39, even likely more than State of Alaska(?). In the link for South Carolina, anyone can find Section 1-6-60, and Section 1-6-70: To see how another state looks at it, even.

Code of Laws - Title 1 - Chapter 6 - Office Of The State Inspector General

At some point probably even someone in Alaska, or Maine--anywhere in the Midwest, or Arizona. . .(?): Looks at Donald Trump and sees a Crime Scene!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Matthew 25: 14-30, following Deut 23: 19-20: Isn't just about abusive subjugation in China or North Korea--Russia or the Ukraine, (about to start a prisoner exchange and cease-fire)!)
 
Curious pattern of Lawlessness applied(?). The Republican election campaign of 2020 gets advertising basis in "Abuse of Power Is Not A Crime!" The platform will go to trial, apparently in January.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Pharaoh's subjugation tyranny became worldwide in Deut. 23: 19-20, citing Acts 7)
 
"It's beginning to look like a Crime Scene, everywhere Trump Goes!" And that's not just about where he Tweets from, and at what hours of the morning(?)!

Texas has a giant Section 39, even likely more than State of Alaska(?). In the link for South Carolina, anyone can find Section 1-6-60, and Section 1-6-70: To see how another state looks at it, even.

Code of Laws - Title 1 - Chapter 6 - Office Of The State Inspector General

At some point probably even someone in Alaska, or Maine--anywhere in the Midwest, or Arizona. . .(?): Looks at Donald Trump and sees a Crime Scene!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Matthew 25: 14-30, following Deut 23: 19-20: Isn't just about abusive subjugation in China or North Korea--Russia or the Ukraine, (about to start a prisoner exchange and cease-fire)!)
What do the laws of Texas have to do with Trump?
 
Commencing a multi-state advertising campaign--RNC, DNC, Socialist Labor Party, North Korea, Russian Federation. . . .

What do the laws of Texas have to do with Trump?

Or, Which of you, (RNC), have contended that the President of the United States should call around asking for foreign interference in the U.S. elections?

The Daily Mantra at RNC--has actually itself not yet been the subject of an investigation!


"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Deut 23: 19-20, a foreign intervention rule, created allegedly of the House of Pharaoh!)
 
Commencing a multi-state advertising campaign--RNC, DNC, Socialist Labor Party, North Korea, Russian Federation. . . .

What do the laws of Texas have to do with Trump?

Or, Which of you, (RNC), have contended that the President of the United States should call around asking for foreign interference in the U.S. elections?

The Daily Mantra at RNC--has actually itself not yet been the subject of an investigation!


"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Deut 23: 19-20, a foreign intervention rule, created allegedly of the House of Pharaoh!)
You're babbling incoherently.
 
So you have contended that the President of the United States should call around asking for foreign interference in the U.S. Elections: Not just Perfect Calls, but perfectly the RNC apparent contention.

The question was asked in the Judiciary Committee Hearings. No one RNC would make a defense.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Moses of the fond memories of the adoptive mother's upbringing and love; Did Honor of it making the Subjugating Tyranny arithmetic of Deut 23: 19-20, the most-closely held of the Laws of Israel--never Reformed, like the Bacon-rules(?)! Oh! Great Pig Meat!)
 
Jeff Epstein and his young nieces were frequent visitors to the Clinton White House
 
"It's beginning to look like a Crime Scene, everywhere Trump Goes!" And that's not just about where he Tweets from, and at what hours of the morning(?)!

Texas has a giant Section 39, even likely more than State of Alaska(?). In the link for South Carolina, anyone can find Section 1-6-60, and Section 1-6-70: To see how another state looks at it, even.

Code of Laws - Title 1 - Chapter 6 - Office Of The State Inspector General

At some point probably even someone in Alaska, or Maine--anywhere in the Midwest, or Arizona. . .(?): Looks at Donald Trump and sees a Crime Scene!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Matthew 25: 14-30, following Deut 23: 19-20: Isn't just about abusive subjugation in China or North Korea--Russia or the Ukraine, (about to start a prisoner exchange and cease-fire)!)

Of course he does! He lived through the Obama years, didn't he!
 
So you have contended that the President of the United States should call around asking for foreign interference in the U.S. Elections: Not just Perfect Calls, but perfectly the RNC apparent contention.

The question was asked in the Judiciary Committee Hearings. No one RNC would make a defense.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Moses of the fond memories of the adoptive mother's upbringing and love; Did Honor of it making the Subjugating Tyranny arithmetic of Deut 23: 19-20, the most-closely held of the Laws of Israel--never Reformed, like the Bacon-rules(?)! Oh! Great Pig Meat!)
What are you blubbering about?
 
"Article III of impeachment against Richard Nixon, the article was based on the idea that Richard Nixon, as president, failed to comply with subpoenas of Congress. Congress was going through its oversight function to provide oversight of the president. When asked for information, Richard Nixon chose not to comply, and the Congress of that time said, 'You're taking impeachment away from us. You're becoming the judge and jury. It is not your job to tell us what we need. It is your job to comply with the things we need to provide oversight over you.' The day Richard Nixon failed to answer that subpoena is the day he was subject to impeachment because he took the power from Congress over the impeachment process away from Congress, and he became the judge and jury." - Lindsey Graham, 1998
 
You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job in this constitutional republic if this body determines that your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role. Impeachment is not about punishment. Impeachment is about cleansing the office. Impeachment is about restoring honor and integrity to the office.” - Lindsay Graham
 
And especially when it comes to the glove. . . .many might contend(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Subjugation Tyranny: Even at prayers, (Deut 23: 19-20)!)
 
Democrats apparently think "Abuse of Power" means winning an election. Hussein is beyond impeachment but how do you define using the IRS to punish political enemies? How about using a faked dossier compiled by a foreign agent to get a warrant to spy on a political opponent? Democrats are so twisted that they ignore not only their constituents but the rest of the Country they are hired to represent in order to engage in a political coup that started on inauguration day. How's that for abuse of power?
 

Forum List

Back
Top