Senate bill would prohibit carry-on bag fee

Discussion in 'Congress' started by Dont Taz Me Bro, Apr 13, 2010.

  1. Dont Taz Me Bro
    Offline

    Dont Taz Me Bro USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    31,611
    Thanks Received:
    6,683
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Ratings:
    +17,486
    I am getting so sick and tired of the Federal government digging its hands into every damn thing it touches. Whether or not an airline charges for a carry-on bag is none of the government's business. They do not have a right to tell an airline what they can and can't charge people for. If you don't want to pay $45 to for your carry-on bag, then don't fly Spirit airlines. See how simple that is? When Spirit starts losing customers they'll be forced to do away with the fee. The bottom line is if Spirit is intent on getting this money, they'll simply just raise ticket prices and get it anyway. We don't need the government to be involved. This is another occurrence of them attempting to over reach their Constitutional limitations.

     
  2. WillowTree
    Offline

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    68,147
    Thanks Received:
    10,164
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +14,702
    they should dis- allow all carry on baggage.. think of the fossil fuel that would be saved.. unless you have a baby who needs a bottle and a diaper change. you don't need a carry on.. waste of time, fuel energy and space. and besides which they could board a plane full of people in 1/4th the time if people weren't up dicking around in the overhead bins. It's always bin :eusa_angel: my number one pet peeve when flying,, some asshole rushes on opens door,, shoves, stuffs crams his shit in the bin, sits by window.. next passenger is seated next to him,,in aisle, then the asshole decides he needs something so he pops up, over the other passenger into the aisle, everthing comes to a standstill while he hauls his shit back out,, rifles through it, rearranges it, pulls out a fucking pocketbook novel and then sits back down.. outlaw that shit.
     
  3. GilbertArizona
    Offline

    GilbertArizona BANNED

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2010
    Messages:
    175
    Thanks Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +24
    I will agree with that stance on that day when the airlines and I reach some sort of agreement that pays me for the intrusion of their flights over my property.
     
  4. Sherry
    Offline

    Sherry You're not the boss of me Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2009
    Messages:
    21,493
    Thanks Received:
    8,795
    Trophy Points:
    960
    Location:
    some beach
    Ratings:
    +11,082
    Stupid asses think that this sort of nonsense will help them regain some of their popularity. Unfortunately for them, many will see right through their attempts at appearing to "look out for our best interests", when what it all really boils down to is the government gaining more control and teaching people to depend on them to "take care of our needs".
     
  5. rightwinger
    Offline

    rightwinger Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    120,262
    Thanks Received:
    19,822
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    NJ & MD
    Ratings:
    +45,337
    The airlines should be able to charge anything they want. There are plenty of upstart airlines who can draw passengers away from the majors if they don't charge excessive fees.

    The airlines should just raise their rates and stop the nickel and dime crap
     
  6. Care4all
    Offline

    Care4all Warrior Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Messages:
    32,761
    Thanks Received:
    6,621
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +11,089
    It is a gimmick on the airlines part....we used to fly where checked baggage and carry on baggage was INCLUDED in the price of the ticket...2 bags to check in and 2 bags that can carry on...

    Then the airlines decided to charge 25 bucks per piece of check in baggage, then the airlines changed it to 25\\$25 for the first piece of checked baggage and $50 for the second piece of baggage, and some now charge for seat assignment ahead of reaching the airport, and NOW they want to charge for our checked in baggage too?

    It is BULL CRAP on the airline's part....

    They advertise their flight for $199 Fare to new york, but then when you go to book it, it is 50% more in price than what they advertised, due to the fees of check in baggage....

    Yes, they can price their product but they should NOT be allowed to deceive their customers with this kind of machination.... Just price the ticket, so we KNOW the full cost of the flight, UPFRONT.
     
  7. Dr Gregg
    Offline

    Dr Gregg BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,901
    Thanks Received:
    198
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +200
    I agree, gov't has no business doing this. Seems to me it would be Spirit airlines suicide if they made that stupid fee.

    Airlines need to come up with better ways to get revenue. ONe thought I had is to sell ad space on the back of seats. For cheaper ticket, I wouldn't mind looking at an ad during the flight

    As much as people bitch and complain about the airlines, they don't have a large profit margin. With the price of jet fuel way up, they have to make sure their flights are full, hence why they usually overbook to ensure that. it doesn't take much for an airline to start losing money
     
    Last edited: Apr 14, 2010
  8. Care4all
    Offline

    Care4all Warrior Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Messages:
    32,761
    Thanks Received:
    6,621
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +11,089
    They are not charging less or more overall....the reason they are doing it this way is to fool customers and make them believe they can afford to fly, whether vacation or work.

    They use this for ADVERTISING ONLY so that they can advertise things like $99 Fares, but the truth of the matter is that it is a $199 dollar fare, when said and done, and THAT is the fare they had advertised before they began this measure.

    As far as fuel going up...there is an additional fee also added to the fare price for that, and as far as safety there is an additional 9/11 fee added to the fare as well and as far as other security fees, they are added to the price as well etc etc etc...along with adding baggage fees and NOW adding carry on fees as well....?

    It is deceiving...I don't believe deceit is a part of capitalism, nor should it ever be....let the sun shine in.... Instead of a Bait and Switch

    Advertise, UPFRONT, what the ACTUAL cost of the fare between New York and San Francisco is....
     
  9. Care4all
    Offline

    Care4all Warrior Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Messages:
    32,761
    Thanks Received:
    6,621
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +11,089
    I took a fare to Tampa, from Bangor maine, on allegiant airlines....they advertised a $19 dollar fare from BGR to TPA....

    But when I went to book it....they charged, a fee to purchase the ticket on line, they charged a fee to get your seat assignment, and they charged a fee for my one bag....they charged all kinds of fees like 9/11 fees etc...

    The fare was $119 dollars one way, when I was done the booking....

    NOW IF THAT is NOT false Advertising, I don't know what is.....
     
  10. Lonestar_logic
    Offline

    Lonestar_logic Republic of Texas

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    24,318
    Thanks Received:
    2,193
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +3,505
    That's why I never fly commercial ailrlines.
     

Share This Page