Sebelius...part of the kinds court.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Listening, Jul 24, 2012.

  1. Listening
    Offline

    Listening Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2011
    Messages:
    14,989
    Thanks Received:
    1,642
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Ratings:
    +2,045
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-23/obama-puts-democrats-back-in-welfare-reform-trap.html

    As with the fight that started earlier this year over whether Catholic organizations should be forced to provide contraceptive coverage to their employees, a rule change from the Department of Health and Human Services started the dispute.

    And once again, the Obama administration is on shaky ground as a matter of both law and politics.

    In 1996, a Republican Congress enacted, and President Bill Clinton signed, a welfare-reform law that imposed a “work requirement” on all states. Every state must make 40 percent of welfare recipients either work, look for work, get on-the-job training, go to high school, get vocational education or participate in job-readiness training. These activities must take up at least 30 hours a week.

    The bipartisan reform is generally considered a success. Welfare caseloads dropped, employment rates for single mothers increased and child poverty declined. Robert Rector, a policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation who played a big role in writing and enacting the law, notes that while the numbers have gone up and down with the economy, all of them have stayed better than they were before the reform.

    Subverting Reforms

    The law has nonetheless always had detractors in the left wing of the Democratic Party, who considered it draconian. A few critics of the law resigned over Clinton’s signing of it. Republicans suspect that the critics are now subverting it.

    On July 12, HHS claimed that Kathleen Sebelius, the department’s head, can let states out of the work requirement. It says she will use that authority not to undermine the goal of moving people from welfare to work, but to give states flexibility in meeting it. She will issue waivers only if those states present a solid plan to improve their performance.

    Quote shortened per board copyright rules**************************

    As you will see, this is another example of Obama doing what he wants regardless of who has the authority.

    It is almost getting scary.
     
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2012
  2. Full-Auto
    Offline

    Full-Auto Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    Messages:
    13,555
    Thanks Received:
    1,614
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Ratings:
    +1,615
    In other words vote democrat and more money will come your way. Tax payer money that is................
     
  3. Listening
    Offline

    Listening Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2011
    Messages:
    14,989
    Thanks Received:
    1,642
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Ratings:
    +2,045
    And more importantly, Sebelius does not care what was law in the past......

    She's gonna do what she pleases.

    Looks like she has joined Obama in using the constitution as toilet paper.
     
  4. Full-Auto
    Offline

    Full-Auto Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    Messages:
    13,555
    Thanks Received:
    1,614
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Ratings:
    +1,615
    That sums up this admin nicely.
     

Share This Page