No paleontologist would remove fossil footprints from the bedrock unless they were in danger of being destroyed.And so they record the evidence, take their photos, and present their hypothesis. What makes you believe they are not as diligent as any other professional. Do I perceive bias on your part? Creationists cannot be bias and yet "evolutionists" can be?When fossil dinosaurs are excavated, each bone is photographed in situ and the location is fully documented. The bones have to be excavated in order to see them all and to reconstruct the skeleton of the animal. Generally, foot prints are not excavated because their location is important information. When you excavate fossil footprints you destroy a lot of important information.So, how exactly does your hypothesis reflect on the removal of fossils from their surrounding strata? Does this not then destroy whatever provenance that they had according to what your BELIEVE?Wrong. It's because you can't fake them if they are still attached to the bedrock. Once a block is removed from the strata, you have destroyed whatever provenance it had.
You claim they followed proper scientific procedure. Then where are the photos of the footprints in situ?
since it was a river bed they were in danger
and if you watch the video and maybe go to the website you would see what you want
its your self imposed ignorance thats the problem
Why would anyone go to a fundamentalist Christian ministry for science facts?
The final and conclusive evidence against evolution is the fact that the Bible denies it.
Henry M. Morris