- Moderator
- #41
They won't win the suit. This is just a political statement.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I own blaylock. You know if you took his brain out and dropped it in a pot and shook it, it would sound like a pea bouncing in a kettle drum.There are not enough words in the english language to describe how stupid that ruling is.
You only need two words to convey that level of stupid: Jake Starkey
just fine = infallible to you?Oh? How so? How can you claim an institution created by fallible human beings as being infallible?Our law courts stand just fine.
What a stupid ruling. This nonsense will likely be overturned in a higher court.
Why is it a stupid ruling?
Because the manufacturers are not to blame.
What a stupid thing to say, but you are Comrade Stupid on this Board.But Comrade Starkiev does not know his ass from a hole in the ground and he loves having someone stick a broom up his ass. He loves those "Moscow Show Trials" from his native USSR.Our law courts stand just fine.
You and I both know why you want the Rule of Man to replace the Rule of Law.
I will when you tell the Board why you want the Rule of Man.What a stupid thing to say, but you are Comrade Stupid on this Board.But Comrade Starkiev does not know his ass from a hole in the ground and he loves having someone stick a broom up his ass. He loves those "Moscow Show Trials" from his native USSR.Our law courts stand just fine.
You and I both know why you want the Rule of Man to replace the Rule of Law.
OK cocksucker, explain why having "judges" be IMMUNE FROM LAWSUITS advances Liberty and Constitutional government .
They won't win the suit. This is just a political statement.
They won't win the suit. This is just a political statement.
It won't bankrupt the gun manufacturers. It's not that difficult a case to defend. Because if the plaintiff's win it will open a floodgate of lawsuits against the manufacturers of automobiles, fast-foods, candy, liquor and on and on and on.If this prevails, it will bankrupt the gun manufactures. It is the perfect way for the Obama regime to implement gun control. It makes as much sense as suing Ford for being the car the drunk driver was driving when he hit you.
It won't bankrupt the gun manufacturers. It's not that difficult a case to defend. Because if the plaintiff's win it will open a floodgate of lawsuits against the manufacturers of automobiles, fast-foods, candy, liquor and on and on and on.If this prevails, it will bankrupt the gun manufactures. It is the perfect way for the Obama regime to implement gun control. It makes as much sense as suing Ford for being the car the drunk driver was driving when he hit you.
I don't know what is behind this judge's ruling but it's either political, bribery, blackmail -- or simple ignorance of anything related to guns. Because ignorance is behind all anti-gun reasoning.
No, another miserable rightwing nitwit exhibiting his comprehensive ignorance of the law.Sandy Hook Lawsuit Allowed to Move Forward
Connecticut Superior Court Judge Barbara N Bellis ruled Thursday that "a lawsuit can go forward against the maker of the rifle used in the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings," rejecting the “argument that a 2005 federal law can protect gun businesses from civil lawsuits.”
Families of several children killed in the Newtown attack and one surviving teacher are suing Remington Arms, parent company of Bushmaster Firearms, who manufactured the weapon — a Bushmaster AR-15 — used by Adam Lanza in the school shooting.
According to The Washington Examiner, the basis of the families' suit is that "the military-style gun should have never been available for civilians to purchase."
Although lawyers for Remington Arms sought to dismiss the lawsuit, Bellis ruled that Remington's argument "that the federal law shields gun manufacturers from most lawsuits over criminal use of their products...would be best made in a motion later in the process and is not grounds to dismiss the lawsuit."
Another miserable piece of shit "judge" who does know her ass from a hole in the ground
.
This is obviously a ridiculous lie from a rightwing moron who has no idea what he’s talking about.Remington will appeal and win.Sandy Hook Lawsuit Allowed to Move Forward
Connecticut Superior Court Judge Barbara N Bellis ruled Thursday that "a lawsuit can go forward against the maker of the rifle used in the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings," rejecting the “argument that a 2005 federal law can protect gun businesses from civil lawsuits.”
Families of several children killed in the Newtown attack and one surviving teacher are suing Remington Arms, parent company of Bushmaster Firearms, who manufactured the weapon — a Bushmaster AR-15 — used by Adam Lanza in the school shooting.
According to The Washington Examiner, the basis of the families' suit is that "the military-style gun should have never been available for civilians to purchase."
Although lawyers for Remington Arms sought to dismiss the lawsuit, Bellis ruled that Remington's argument "that the federal law shields gun manufacturers from most lawsuits over criminal use of their products...would be best made in a motion later in the process and is not grounds to dismiss the lawsuit."
Another miserable piece of shit "judge" who does know her ass from a hole in the ground
.
This is obviously a liberal judge with an ideological ax to grind
the right wing dont lie or else wed bcalled the rong wing cuz theres the good conservitives right wing and the evil libturdz left wing. itz u libturz that is liers nd r goeng too hell were u belongThis is obviously a ridiculous lie from a rightwing moron who has no idea what he’s talking about.Remington will appeal and win.Sandy Hook Lawsuit Allowed to Move Forward
Connecticut Superior Court Judge Barbara N Bellis ruled Thursday that "a lawsuit can go forward against the maker of the rifle used in the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings," rejecting the “argument that a 2005 federal law can protect gun businesses from civil lawsuits.”
Families of several children killed in the Newtown attack and one surviving teacher are suing Remington Arms, parent company of Bushmaster Firearms, who manufactured the weapon — a Bushmaster AR-15 — used by Adam Lanza in the school shooting.
According to The Washington Examiner, the basis of the families' suit is that "the military-style gun should have never been available for civilians to purchase."
Although lawyers for Remington Arms sought to dismiss the lawsuit, Bellis ruled that Remington's argument "that the federal law shields gun manufacturers from most lawsuits over criminal use of their products...would be best made in a motion later in the process and is not grounds to dismiss the lawsuit."
Another miserable piece of shit "judge" who does know her ass from a hole in the ground
.
This is obviously a liberal judge with an ideological ax to grind
the right wing dont lie or else wed bcalled the rong wing cuz theres the good conservitives right wing and the evil libturdz left wing. itz u libturz that is liers nd r goeng too hell were u belong
Instead of saying "the left," which is a vague and obscure designation, why not clarify your comment with a more specific and identifiable designation, that being those who know nothing about guns and are afraid of them. Which probably includes the issuing judge.If this prevails, it will bankrupt the gun manufactures. It is the perfect way for the Obama regime to implement gun control. It makes as much sense as suing Ford for being the car the drunk driver was driving when he hit you.
This is how the left will proceed in their quest to rid the world of guns.