Russian troops join combat in Syria

Pete7469

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Mar 23, 2013
29,838
16,693
1,405
The Real World
Exclusive: Russian troops join combat in Syria - sources

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry spoke to his Russian counterpart for the second time in four days to express concern over reports of Russian military activities in Syria, warning that it could fan more violence.

OK, every cognizant adult already knows John Kerry is weapons grade stupid AND a criminally insane totalitarian sociopath (usually moonbats are one or the other) but why would MORE violence against islamic radicals be a problem? NONE of Assad's enemies are "moderate" moose-limbs. Assad IS A MODERATE MOOSE-LIMB!! For the entire length of his rule Christians and other religious minorities had no problem living in Syria. Assad may be a tyrannical despot when it comes to dealing with jihadi zealots, so was Qaddafi and even Saddam Hussein. The difference being that Saddam was terrorizing his entire country and threatening his neighbors. He had to go.

So now enters the Russians, who aren't interested in "winning hearts and minds", they're there to bayonet the "hearts and minds" of bloodthirsty jihadist scumbags and here comes the moonbat messiah's stooges warning about "more violence"? It's too bad the russians didn't intervene in Libya and prevent Qaddafi from being overthrown. Libya is a complete disaster thanks to the moonbat messiah's utter incompetence, and Syria is on the brink of becoming a state controlled by the most savage islamic psychopaths since mu-ham-head himself raped and pillaged his way across the middle east.

Yet there are insipid little bed wetters right here on this forum that believed the moonbat messiah when he claimed:

--ISIS was a "JV Team".

--That obozo was going to effectively engage and destroy ISIS when it was clear even to a bed wetter that they weren't a "JV Team".

--That he actually has them "contained".

Things have gotten incredibly worse around the world since that big eared meat muppet with Valerie Jarret's hand up his ass took office, but libtards prove everyday that they're the dumbest mother fuckers on earth by regurgitating "media matters" nonsense. I really can't articulate the depth of my contempt for these sniveling parasites effectively enough.
 
Every one with brain knows the Russian military is in Syria.

What's your point.
 
Every one with brain knows the Russian military is in Syria.

What's your point.

I agree that it's obvious they are in Syria.

Question is why has the media largely ignored that until now.

And now that it's so open how will the rest of the world react?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
It wont be that simple. Global conflict is beginning.

The best thing the moonbat messiah could do is leave the Russians alone in Syria. There is a problem in Syria that can't be solved by a meat muppet.

However since obozo never does anything in the best interests of the country, he's probably going to interfere as much as possible with the Russians, even if it means sending material support to jihadi assholes who would just as soon use them on us.


 
Every one with brain knows the Russian military is in Syria.

What's your point.

I agree that it's obvious they are in Syria.

Question is why has the media largely ignored that until now.

And now that it's so open how will the rest of the world react?

cia has had "assets" in every major media service since after WWII to help "influence" and sway public opinion toward whatever they needed..

....in some cases the entire companies were "fronts" for their propaganda and other activities.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
cia has had "assets" in every major media service since after WWII..

....in some cases the entire companies were "fronts" for their propaganda and other activities.

Be that as it may, most of the CIA as I recall were uber patriots and anti-communist.

Most journalists are anti-patriot and uber socialist.


 
cia has had "assets" in every major media service since after WWII..

....in some cases the entire companies were "fronts" for their propaganda and other activities.

Be that as it may, most of the CIA as I recall were uber patriots and anti-communist.

Most journalists are anti-patriot and uber socialist.


they're machiavellian and they will eat their own...

ask jfk about some of their "uber patriots" :)

EDIT:..but anyway...like you said...russians aren't there on a humanitarian mission. Interesting times we live in...unfortunately...
 
cia has had "assets" in every major media service since after WWII..

....in some cases the entire companies were "fronts" for their propaganda and other activities.

Be that as it may, most of the CIA as I recall were uber patriots and anti-communist.

Most journalists are anti-patriot and uber socialist.


Yup and most of todays journalists are to busy trying to make the news rather than reporting it.
 
cia has had "assets" in every major media service since after WWII..

....in some cases the entire companies were "fronts" for their propaganda and other activities.

Be that as it may, most of the CIA as I recall were uber patriots and anti-communist.

Most journalists are anti-patriot and uber socialist.

The major media sources should be entirely owned and operated by US citizens. When you put a few folks in the world in charge of your media you'll get what they want you to hear.
 
The major media sources should be entirely owned and operated by US citizens. When you put a few folks in the world in charge of your media you'll get what they want you to hear.

Thanks to the internet there is much more information available, the problem is sorting the truth from the liberal propaganda.






 
cia has had "assets" in every major media service since after WWII..

....in some cases the entire companies were "fronts" for their propaganda and other activities.

Be that as it may, most of the CIA as I recall were uber patriots and anti-communist.

Most journalists are anti-patriot and uber socialist.

The major media sources should be entirely owned and operated by US citizens. When you put a few folks in the world in charge of your media you'll get what they want you to hear.

concur...and all one has to do is look at who owns which media outlet and then look at their programming or writing and see which position they endorse...our government our academic institutions and our media have all been infiltrated and turned against us...
 
The major media sources should be entirely owned and operated by US citizens. When you put a few folks in the world in charge of your media you'll get what they want you to hear.

Thanks to the internet there is much more information available, the problem is sorting the truth from the liberal propaganda.






agree..but all other nations also have THEIR propaganda assets in place, too...it takes careful sifting to get anywhere near the truth
 
And the sifting by the far left and far right for evidences of cognitive dissonance to support their confirmation only murks the waters more.
 
cia has had "assets" in every major media service since after WWII..

....in some cases the entire companies were "fronts" for their propaganda and other activities.

Be that as it may, most of the CIA as I recall were uber patriots and anti-communist.

Most journalists are anti-patriot and uber socialist.


Yup and most of todays journalists are to busy trying to make the news rather than reporting it.
A lot of true journalist got their walking papers a long time ago.
 
cia has had "assets" in every major media service since after WWII..

....in some cases the entire companies were "fronts" for their propaganda and other activities.

Be that as it may, most of the CIA as I recall were uber patriots and anti-communist.

Most journalists are anti-patriot and uber socialist.


Yup and most of todays journalists are to busy trying to make the news rather than reporting it.
A lot of true journalist got their walking papers a long time ago.
they were no longer "useful"
 

Forum List

Back
Top