harmonica
Diamond Member
- Sep 1, 2017
- 43,841
- 20,021
- 2,300
Kursk was a victory for the Germans???!!!!??? reallyLOL, and yet about 80% of Nazis killed were killed by Soviets..
And yet far more Soviet died than Nazis, 100 to 1. The Soviets couldn't even survive after the war without western aid.
The Soviets were the first to capture Berlin the Nazi German capital...
I think you clearly need to re-read history...
Yes, because Eisenhower stopped at his original position he chose before we invaded Europe, and of course the Soviets had to rely on the West to even be in the war at all, dummy. They wouldn't have gotten past their positions at the end of the invasion without western aid, period. they had nothing to fight with, and all the babbling about their 'industrial capacity' is a lot of rubbish propaganda, we now know for certain. They couldn't even produce their own aviation fuel.
Haha, Soviets had more tanks, and aircraft than Nazis, with, or without Western aid.
I think the only one spreading rubbish propaganda is yourself.
For those in the Peanut Gallery who need a clue about this, there are lists of what the Soviets had left after the Germans had reached Moscow and Stalingrad. Anybody claiming the Soviets had all kinds of stuff of their own to resist with is clearly crazy. they couldn't launch a real offensive until the following summer, and after massive numbers of tanks, ammo, food, etc arrived. The Kursk breakout would have been a pipe dream. The only thing the Russian exceled in was mine fields, many miles deep, the only thing that stopped the German advances.