Greenbeard
Gold Member
Wow, when I abandon reality, I get that, but it's only temporary, until my senses kick back in.
CO2 the great evil. Maybe you should just hold your breath? By your reasoning Air must be evil.
Massachusetts v. EPA is not my reasoning, it's a Supreme Court ruling that addresses the EPA's responsibilities for regulating greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act.
The EPA isn't compelled to do anything or enforce anything, it does not feel like doing.
Again, you need to be telling this to the Supreme Court, not me.
Under the Act’s clear terms, EPA can avoid promulgating regulations only if it determines that greenhouse gases do not contribute to climate change or if it provides some reasonable explanation as to why it cannot or will not exercise its discretion to determine whether they do. [...] The statutory question is whether sufficient information exists for it to make an endangerment finding. Instead, EPA rejected the rulemaking petition based on impermissible considerations. Its action was therefore “arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise not in accordance with law,” §7607(d)(9). On remand, EPA must ground its reasons for action or inaction in the statute.