Ron Paul on abolishing TSA

You should be sorry for your ignorance. We had screening before the TSA.

To imply that screening only occurred after the TSA is most amusing.

How did that screening work on 9-11?

Screening wasn't the issue.

First off, one must look into the deeper causes of 9/11 besides screening. Second, many government agencies had information and warned the apathetic Bush administration about the dangers of a terrorist attack.

Guess what boy wonder did instead? Clear brush on his Texas ranch. Yet, people like you blame 9/11 on airport security. Keep swinging buddy.

Irrelevant to preventing future attacks

TSA in addition to other post 9-11 changes to procedures have prevented another attack for ten years and I, for one, am thankful that we do not have Ron Paul protecting us
 
How did that screening work on 9-11?

Screening wasn't the issue.

First off, one must look into the deeper causes of 9/11 besides screening. Second, many government agencies had information and warned the apathetic Bush administration about the dangers of a terrorist attack.

Guess what boy wonder did instead? Clear brush on his Texas ranch. Yet, people like you blame 9/11 on airport security. Keep swinging buddy.

Irrelevant to preventing future attacks

TSA in addition to other post 9-11 changes to procedures have prevented another attack for ten years and I, for one, am thankful that we do not have Ron Paul protecting us

Again, lack of screening is not the cause for these attacks, so your irrelevancy is, ironically, irrelevant.

As for Ron Paul, keep dismissing him and keep paying the price.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hJTisovvjc]Ron Paul Predicted 9/11 a Decade Ago!!!!!!!!!!!! - YouTube[/ame]
 
Screening wasn't the issue.

First off, one must look into the deeper causes of 9/11 besides screening. Second, many government agencies had information and warned the apathetic Bush administration about the dangers of a terrorist attack.

Guess what boy wonder did instead? Clear brush on his Texas ranch. Yet, people like you blame 9/11 on airport security. Keep swinging buddy.

Irrelevant to preventing future attacks

TSA in addition to other post 9-11 changes to procedures have prevented another attack for ten years and I, for one, am thankful that we do not have Ron Paul protecting us

Again, lack of screening is not the cause for these attacks, so your irrelevancy is, ironically, irrelevant.

As for Ron Paul, keep dismissing him and keep paying the price.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hJTisovvjc]Ron Paul Predicted 9/11 a Decade Ago!!!!!!!!!!!! - YouTube[/ame]

Current screening and preventive measures would have prevented the 9-11 attacks

Ron Paul would not have. Thank god for the safety of our country, we will never elect anyone as irresponsible as Ron Paul
 
Last edited:
You should be sorry for your ignorance. We had screening before the TSA.

To imply that screening only occurred after the TSA is most amusing.

How did that screening work on 9-11?

Screening wasn't the issue.

First off, one must look into the deeper causes of 9/11 besides screening. Second, many government agencies had information and warned the apathetic Bush administration about the dangers of a terrorist attack.

Guess what boy wonder did instead? Clear brush on his Texas ranch. Yet, people like you blame 9/11 on airport security. Keep swinging buddy.

Please describe for me exactly what you would have had Bush do to prevent the attacks, keeping in mind that the information available was basically;

UBL is going to attack us somewhere somehow sometime...............
 
How did that screening work on 9-11?

Screening wasn't the issue.

First off, one must look into the deeper causes of 9/11 besides screening. Second, many government agencies had information and warned the apathetic Bush administration about the dangers of a terrorist attack.

Guess what boy wonder did instead? Clear brush on his Texas ranch. Yet, people like you blame 9/11 on airport security. Keep swinging buddy.

Please describe for me exactly what you would have had Bush do to prevent the attacks, keeping in mind that the information available was basically;

UBL is going to attack us somewhere somehow sometime...............

He is a Paulite

If we had been nice to everyone and minded our own business nobody would have bothered with us

Bad things never happen to nice people
 
Current screening and preventive measures would have prevented the 9-11 attacks

Ron Paul would not have. Thank god for the safety of our country, we will never elect anyone as irresponsible as Ron Paul

IOW, you only have unsubstantiated speculative drivel to offer.

Plus, I see that you completely deflected from the argument at hand: That lack of screening was not the main problem behind 9/11. In fact, the 9/11 Commission clearly states the three main problems behind 9/11 and lack of screening was not one of them.

The three main reasons behind 9/11 were nation building and a military presence in Saudi Arabia which they considered Holy Lands, our sanctions on Iraq that wrecked havoc and led to the death of a half a million children, and our unabashed aid Israel.

If Ron Paul was in charge, none of those incentives would have taken place, and therefore 9/11 would have never occurred.

Keep swinging...it is amusing watching you strike out.
 
How did that screening work on 9-11?

Screening wasn't the issue.

First off, one must look into the deeper causes of 9/11 besides screening. Second, many government agencies had information and warned the apathetic Bush administration about the dangers of a terrorist attack.

Guess what boy wonder did instead? Clear brush on his Texas ranch. Yet, people like you blame 9/11 on airport security. Keep swinging buddy.

Please describe for me exactly what you would have had Bush do to prevent the attacks, keeping in mind that the information available was basically;

UBL is going to attack us somewhere somehow sometime...............

First off, you are changing the debate to after the fact and validating the reactionary measures of the TSA, but I will amuse you.

Step One: Stop vacationing in Texas where you are busy clearing brush and take Clarke seriously.
Bush Administration's First Memo on al-Qaeda Declassified
 
Ron Paul's idea of security would destroy the USA.

No thank you........

The good news is that Ron Paul, as a congressman has never gotten any of his bizarre legislation passed. As a presidential candidate, he has never won a single state

Americans realize he cannot be entrusted with the security of our nation and would never tolerate his ideas

So, with the exception of a loyal horde of Internet Paulites, we are safe from his extremist rants
 
Screening wasn't the issue.

First off, one must look into the deeper causes of 9/11 besides screening. Second, many government agencies had information and warned the apathetic Bush administration about the dangers of a terrorist attack.

Guess what boy wonder did instead? Clear brush on his Texas ranch. Yet, people like you blame 9/11 on airport security. Keep swinging buddy.

Please describe for me exactly what you would have had Bush do to prevent the attacks, keeping in mind that the information available was basically;

UBL is going to attack us somewhere somehow sometime...............

He is a Paulite

If we had been nice to everyone and minded our own business nobody would have bothered with us

Bad things never happen to nice people

yawn...your sophomoric response is nothing short but a failed attempt to silence and misdirect this conservation rather than to have an honest and thoughtful conversation.

Enjoy your red herring served up by a strawman.

If you are not going to be serious, then this conversation is over and don't blame me for ending it.
 
Once Ron Paul abolishes the TSA, we can rely on the good will of our fellow passengers to protect us. With no foreign involvement, no one outside our borders will have any reason to be cross with us

Our skies will once again be safe to fly in and Rons boy Rand will be safe to fly without anyone patting his private parts

The joy of a libertarian world
 
Screening wasn't the issue.

First off, one must look into the deeper causes of 9/11 besides screening. Second, many government agencies had information and warned the apathetic Bush administration about the dangers of a terrorist attack.

Guess what boy wonder did instead? Clear brush on his Texas ranch. Yet, people like you blame 9/11 on airport security. Keep swinging buddy.

Please describe for me exactly what you would have had Bush do to prevent the attacks, keeping in mind that the information available was basically;

UBL is going to attack us somewhere somehow sometime...............

First off, you are changing the debate to after the fact and validating the reactionary measures of the TSA, but I will amuse you.

Step One: Stop vacationing in Texas where you are busy clearing brush and take Clarke seriously.
Bush Administration's First Memo on al-Qaeda Declassified

So you believe (as does Mr Clarke) that we should have put all the things we did after 9-11 into effect prior to 9-11.

And The people would have screamed for an impeachment. There was nothing concrete enough to cause us to prepare for War in Afghanistan as Mr Clarke wanted to, There was not sufficient evidence that there would be an attack of such a massive scale at all. Unless of course you use hindsight. That makes all the answers easy.

I could just see what would have happened (with all the complaints we hear about the TSA today) if we would have beefed up security without the 9-11 attacks...

You want to quote Clarke you go ahead. But there really was nothing we could have done publicly with what information we had......
 
Tell the Armed Services how fucking crazy Ron Paul is.
Top Contributors to Ron Paul | OpenSecrets

Really? And? So soldiers seem to be supporting the guy who says they don't have to risk their lives everyday..... No shit. Also Soldiers are younger in general and where does Rep Paul get most of his support? Young and dumb.........

I (Retired US Army Sergeant First Class) do not trust Ron Paul with the security of this Nation.
 
Tell the Armed Services how fucking crazy Ron Paul is.
Top Contributors to Ron Paul | OpenSecrets

Really? And? So soldiers seem to be supporting the guy who says they don't have to risk their lives everyday..... No shit. Also Soldiers are younger in general and where does Rep Paul get most of his support? Young and dumb.........

I (Retired US Army Sergeant First Class) do not trust Ron Paul with the security of this Nation.

If soldiers don't believe in the cause that they are risking their lives for, then there is a fundamental problem. Perhaps, invading and starting a war a with a country that posed no threat to us, based off of fabrications and manipulations has something to do with it.

In addition, the old and the established have proven that they are inept at running this country and a war. Heck, it has taken a decade to get Iraq "under a control" and establish a "freedom loving Western Democracy" all while piling on a huge debt combined with unnecessary lives lost. If you were so experienced and knowledgeable, then why does it take so many lives, resources, and time to conquer a backward country that posed no threat to us?

The young are getting delusionalled with the old and established, and your self-aggrandizing and pontification is not helping, but exacerbating this disillusionment.
 
Last edited:
Plus, it is not just the young who are disillusioned.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e700MCvwXRc&feature=relmfu]Don't repeat Vietnam in Afghanistan Pt.1 - YouTube[/ame]
 
Last edited:
The TSA are just another branch of the police state growing in America; its as simple as that.

Your own neo-cons attacked you anyway. God overslept on the 7th and the New World Order was born on September 11th!
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top