tjvh
Senior Member
- May 10, 2012
- 6,893
- 918
- 48
Regardless who is president, the USA will maintain an armed presence in Afghanistan.
Yes, but an armed presence doesn't mean exactly translate into a "takeover", as some suggest.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Regardless who is president, the USA will maintain an armed presence in Afghanistan.
Regardless who is president, the USA will maintain an armed presence in Afghanistan.
Yes, but an armed presence doesn't mean exactly translate into a "takeover", as some suggest.
Regardless who is president, the USA will maintain an armed presence in Afghanistan.
Yes, but an armed presence doesn't mean exactly translate into a "takeover", as some suggest.
I know it, you know it, but some of the right are fraid the bad guys are going to take over America and some on the left think we are going to take over the universe.
Heard on the radio that an airstrike took out an A-Q #2 level commander in Afghanistan.
That's the way to do it: Spec Ops, helicopters, drones, and assassiantions.
If you think our Military is "trying to take Afghanistan" then your lack of intelligence is ASTOUNDING, and to be quite honest... VERY disturbing.
So what are they doing there, trying NOT to take Afghanistan?
We are not trying to "take Afghanistan", we are trying to eradicate Terrorists who are "operating IN Afghanistan". Are IQ's in tailspins around here, or what?