Romney Refuses to Respond To Merits of Supreme Court Decision | Arizona Law

[Procrustes Stretched]

Romney Refuses to Respond To Merits of Supreme Court Decision | Arizona Law

The Conservative standard bearer is a disgrace to principle. Romney refused to take this opportunity to respond to the merits of teh Supreme Court decision on Arizona's immigration law case.

All Mitty Von Flipflop has done is criticize the President and throw raw meat to teh conservative base which is frothing at the mouth for blood.

Politicians respond to Supreme Court rulings – CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs

"Today's decision underscores the need for a President who will lead on this critical issue and work in a bipartisan fashion to pursue a national immigration strategy. President Obama has failed to provide any leadership on immigration. This represents yet another broken promise by this President. I believe that each state has the duty–and the right–to secure our borders and preserve the rule of law, particularly when the federal government has failed to meet its responsibilities. As Candidate Obama, he promised to present an immigration plan during his first year in office. But 4 years later, we are still waiting."

What a loser. Romney is nothing but a vapid political opportunist who will do or say anything in order to become The First Mormon President

back on topic...

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Scalia speaks

Speaking in dissent of most of the court’s rulings on Arizona’s immigration law, Scalia took a clear swipe in his remarks at the Obama administration’s new policy ending deportations of many young adults brought into the country illegally — which was not part of the Arizona case.
“The president has said that the new program is ‘the right thing to do’ in light of Congress’s failure to pass the administration’s proposed revision of the immigration laws,” Scalia said. “Perhaps it is, though Arizona might not think so.”
Scalia asked whether states would have entered into the union had the Constitution included a clause enacting immigration laws but stipulating that the president had a choice on whether to enforce them. Delegates would have “rushed to the exits” at Independence Hall.
By passing a state immigration law, he added, Arizona had “moved to protect its sovereignty — not in contradiction of federal law, but in complete compliance with it.”
But, “if securing its territory in this fashion is not within the power of Arizona, we should cease referring to it as a sovereign state.”
The court upheld a key piece of the Arizona’s law — requiring police to check the immigration status of those they arrest or stop for questioning — but struck down other pieces of the law, arguing the state had stepped into the bounds of federal law.
“To say, as the Court does, that Arizona contradicts federal law by enforcing immigration law that the president declines to enforce boggles the mind,” Scalia said.


Read more: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia takes swipe at Barack Obama's immigration action - POLITICO.com

 

[Vel]

Romney Refuses to Respond To Merits of Supreme Court Decision | Arizona Law

The Conservative standard bearer is a disgrace to principle. Romney refused to take this opportunity to respond to the merits of teh Supreme Court decision on Arizona's immigration law case.

All Mitty Von Flipflop has done is criticize the President and throw raw meat to teh conservative base which is frothing at the mouth for blood.

Politicians respond to Supreme Court rulings – CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs

"Today's decision underscores the need for a President who will lead on this critical issue and work in a bipartisan fashion to pursue a national immigration strategy. President Obama has failed to provide any leadership on immigration. This represents yet another broken promise by this President. I believe that each state has the duty–and the right–to secure our borders and preserve the rule of law, particularly when the federal government has failed to meet its responsibilities. As Candidate Obama, he promised to present an immigration plan during his first year in office. But 4 years later, we are still waiting."

What a loser. Romney is nothing but a vapid political opportunist who will do or say anything in order to become The First Mormon President

Looks like a response to the merits of the decision to me. Do you need to have someone translate the big words or do you just want Romney to pull an Obama and publicly chastise the Supreme Court?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Scalia speaks

Speaking in dissent of most of the court’s rulings on Arizona’s immigration law, Scalia took a clear swipe in his remarks at the Obama administration’s new policy ending deportations of many young adults brought into the country illegally — which was not part of the Arizona case.
“The president has said that the new program is ‘the right thing to do’ in light of Congress’s failure to pass the administration’s proposed revision of the immigration laws,” Scalia said. “Perhaps it is, though Arizona might not think so.”
Scalia asked whether states would have entered into the union had the Constitution included a clause enacting immigration laws but stipulating that the president had a choice on whether to enforce them. Delegates would have “rushed to the exits” at Independence Hall.
By passing a state immigration law, he added, Arizona had “moved to protect its sovereignty — not in contradiction of federal law, but in complete compliance with it.”
But, “if securing its territory in this fashion is not within the power of Arizona, we should cease referring to it as a sovereign state.”
The court upheld a key piece of the Arizona’s law — requiring police to check the immigration status of those they arrest or stop for questioning — but struck down other pieces of the law, arguing the state had stepped into the bounds of federal law.
“To say, as the Court does, that Arizona contradicts federal law by enforcing immigration law that the president declines to enforce boggles the mind,” Scalia said.


Read more: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia takes swipe at Barack Obama's immigration action - POLITICO.com

Scalia has been using the Court as a public platform for his ideological views. Maybe he needs to be impeached?

 

[The T]

No knee jerk reaction from Romney upsets moonbats.

Romney isn't playing thier game. That's what the OP is so butthurt about.

 

[The T]

Romney Refuses to Respond To Merits of Supreme Court Decision | Arizona Law

The Conservative standard bearer is a disgrace to principle. Romney refused to take this opportunity to respond to the merits of teh Supreme Court decision on Arizona's immigration law case.

All Mitty Von Flipflop has done is criticize the President and throw raw meat to teh conservative base which is frothing at the mouth for blood.

Politicians respond to Supreme Court rulings – CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs

"Today's decision underscores the need for a President who will lead on this critical issue and work in a bipartisan fashion to pursue a national immigration strategy. President Obama has failed to provide any leadership on immigration. This represents yet another broken promise by this President. I believe that each state has the duty–and the right–to secure our borders and preserve the rule of law, particularly when the federal government has failed to meet its responsibilities. As Candidate Obama, he promised to present an immigration plan during his first year in office. But 4 years later, we are still waiting."

What a loser. Romney is nothing but a vapid political opportunist who will do or say anything in order to become The First Mormon President

Butthurt Romney isn't playing your game?

GOOD. You should be.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Scalia speaks

Speaking in dissent of most of the court’s rulings on Arizona’s immigration law, Scalia took a clear swipe in his remarks at the Obama administration’s new policy ending deportations of many young adults brought into the country illegally — which was not part of the Arizona case.
“The president has said that the new program is ‘the right thing to do’ in light of Congress’s failure to pass the administration’s proposed revision of the immigration laws,” Scalia said. “Perhaps it is, though Arizona might not think so.”
Scalia asked whether states would have entered into the union had the Constitution included a clause enacting immigration laws but stipulating that the president had a choice on whether to enforce them. Delegates would have “rushed to the exits” at Independence Hall.
By passing a state immigration law, he added, Arizona had “moved to protect its sovereignty — not in contradiction of federal law, but in complete compliance with it.”
But, “if securing its territory in this fashion is not within the power of Arizona, we should cease referring to it as a sovereign state.”
The court upheld a key piece of the Arizona’s law — requiring police to check the immigration status of those they arrest or stop for questioning — but struck down other pieces of the law, arguing the state had stepped into the bounds of federal law.
“To say, as the Court does, that Arizona contradicts federal law by enforcing immigration law that the president declines to enforce boggles the mind,” Scalia said.


Read more: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia takes swipe at Barack Obama's immigration action - POLITICO.com

Scalia has been using the Court as a public platform for his ideological views. Maybe he needs to be impeached?

So it's to much to ask THE LAWLESS ONE to enforce the laws we already have?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Scalia speaks

Speaking in dissent of most of the court’s rulings on Arizona’s immigration law, Scalia took a clear swipe in his remarks at the Obama administration’s new policy ending deportations of many young adults brought into the country illegally — which was not part of the Arizona case.
“The president has said that the new program is ‘the right thing to do’ in light of Congress’s failure to pass the administration’s proposed revision of the immigration laws,” Scalia said. “Perhaps it is, though Arizona might not think so.”
Scalia asked whether states would have entered into the union had the Constitution included a clause enacting immigration laws but stipulating that the president had a choice on whether to enforce them. Delegates would have “rushed to the exits” at Independence Hall.
By passing a state immigration law, he added, Arizona had “moved to protect its sovereignty — not in contradiction of federal law, but in complete compliance with it.”
But, “if securing its territory in this fashion is not within the power of Arizona, we should cease referring to it as a sovereign state.”
The court upheld a key piece of the Arizona’s law — requiring police to check the immigration status of those they arrest or stop for questioning — but struck down other pieces of the law, arguing the state had stepped into the bounds of federal law.
“To say, as the Court does, that Arizona contradicts federal law by enforcing immigration law that the president declines to enforce boggles the mind,” Scalia said.


Read more: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia takes swipe at Barack Obama's immigration action - POLITICO.com

Scalia has been using the Court as a public platform for his ideological views. Maybe he needs to be impeached?

So it's to much to ask THE LAWLESS ONE to enforce the laws we already have?

Scalia's style of commenting is often unprecedented. He has no respect for the Court and precedent and tradition and history. He has turned out to be a vile partisan hack in a robe

 

[BDBoop]

Romney is a place marker. They don't want or need him to think, he just needs to be able to sign the papers put in front of him.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Scalia has been using the Court as a public platform for his ideological views. Maybe he needs to be impeached?

So it's to much to ask THE LAWLESS ONE to enforce the laws we already have?

Scalia's style of commenting is often unprecedented. He has no respect for the Court and precedent and tradition and history. He has turned out to be a vile partisan hack in a robe

So it's to much to ask THE LAWLESS ONE to enforce the laws we already have?

 

[Sallow]

Scalia has been using the Court as a public platform for his ideological views. Maybe he needs to be impeached?

So it's to much to ask THE LAWLESS ONE to enforce the laws we already have?

Scalia's style of commenting is often unprecedented. He has no respect for the Court and precedent and tradition and history. He has turned out to be a vile partisan hack in a robe

Very much so.

And he's also said some pretty bizzare things.

 

[The T]

So it's to much to ask THE LAWLESS ONE to enforce the laws we already have?

Scalia's style of commenting is often unprecedented. He has no respect for the Court and precedent and tradition and history. He has turned out to be a vile partisan hack in a robe

So it's to much to ask THE LAWLESS ONE to enforce the laws we already have?

Obama had his ass handed to him today...Arizona still can do what it has been doing.

 

[Si modo]

Romney Refuses to Respond To Merits of Supreme Court Decision | Arizona Law

The Conservative standard bearer is a disgrace to principle. Romney refused to take this opportunity to respond to the merits of teh Supreme Court decision on Arizona's immigration law case.

All Mitty Von Flipflop has done is criticize the President and throw raw meat to teh conservative base which is frothing at the mouth for blood.

Politicians respond to Supreme Court rulings – CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs

"Today's decision underscores the need for a President who will lead on this critical issue and work in a bipartisan fashion to pursue a national immigration strategy. President Obama has failed to provide any leadership on immigration. This represents yet another broken promise by this President. I believe that each state has the duty–and the right–to secure our borders and preserve the rule of law, particularly when the federal government has failed to meet its responsibilities. As Candidate Obama, he promised to present an immigration plan during his first year in office. But 4 years later, we are still waiting."

What a loser. Romney is nothing but a vapid political opportunist who will do or say anything in order to become The First Mormon President

What he said is spot on.

What is it about what he said that is troubling you?

 

[Sallow]

Scalia speaks

Speaking in dissent of most of the court’s rulings on Arizona’s immigration law, Scalia took a clear swipe in his remarks at the Obama administration’s new policy ending deportations of many young adults brought into the country illegally — which was not part of the Arizona case.
“The president has said that the new program is ‘the right thing to do’ in light of Congress’s failure to pass the administration’s proposed revision of the immigration laws,” Scalia said. “Perhaps it is, though Arizona might not think so.”
Scalia asked whether states would have entered into the union had the Constitution included a clause enacting immigration laws but stipulating that the president had a choice on whether to enforce them. Delegates would have “rushed to the exits” at Independence Hall.
By passing a state immigration law, he added, Arizona had “moved to protect its sovereignty — not in contradiction of federal law, but in complete compliance with it.”
But, “if securing its territory in this fashion is not within the power of Arizona, we should cease referring to it as a sovereign state.”
The court upheld a key piece of the Arizona’s law — requiring police to check the immigration status of those they arrest or stop for questioning — but struck down other pieces of the law, arguing the state had stepped into the bounds of federal law.
“To say, as the Court does, that Arizona contradicts federal law by enforcing immigration law that the president declines to enforce boggles the mind,” Scalia said.


Read more: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia takes swipe at Barack Obama's immigration action - POLITICO.com

Scalia has been using the Court as a public platform for his ideological views. Maybe he needs to be impeached?

He does bring to a close the notion that justice is blind and the scales are balanced.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

So it's to much to ask THE LAWLESS ONE to enforce the laws we already have?

Scalia's style of commenting is often unprecedented. He has no respect for the Court and precedent and tradition and history. He has turned out to be a vile partisan hack in a robe

Very much so.

And he's also said some pretty bizzare things.

So it's to much to ask THE LAWLESS ONE to enforce the laws we already have?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Scalia speaks

Speaking in dissent of most of the court’s rulings on Arizona’s immigration law, Scalia took a clear swipe in his remarks at the Obama administration’s new policy ending deportations of many young adults brought into the country illegally — which was not part of the Arizona case.
“The president has said that the new program is ‘the right thing to do’ in light of Congress’s failure to pass the administration’s proposed revision of the immigration laws,” Scalia said. “Perhaps it is, though Arizona might not think so.”
Scalia asked whether states would have entered into the union had the Constitution included a clause enacting immigration laws but stipulating that the president had a choice on whether to enforce them. Delegates would have “rushed to the exits” at Independence Hall.
By passing a state immigration law, he added, Arizona had “moved to protect its sovereignty — not in contradiction of federal law, but in complete compliance with it.”
But, “if securing its territory in this fashion is not within the power of Arizona, we should cease referring to it as a sovereign state.”
The court upheld a key piece of the Arizona’s law — requiring police to check the immigration status of those they arrest or stop for questioning — but struck down other pieces of the law, arguing the state had stepped into the bounds of federal law.
“To say, as the Court does, that Arizona contradicts federal law by enforcing immigration law that the president declines to enforce boggles the mind,” Scalia said.


Read more: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia takes swipe at Barack Obama's immigration action - POLITICO.com

Scalia has been using the Court as a public platform for his ideological views. Maybe he needs to be impeached?

He does bring to a close the notion that justice is blind and the scales are balanced.

I don't understand your thinking We have laws on the books why is The Lawless One fighting not too enforce them?

 

[GuyPinestra]

Scalia has been using the Court as a public platform for his ideological views. Maybe he needs to be impeached?

So it's to much to ask THE LAWLESS ONE to enforce the laws we already have?

Scalia's style of commenting is often unprecedented. He has no respect for the Court and precedent and tradition and history. He has turned out to be a vile partisan hack in a robe

To see those words coming from a leftwing ideologue like you is truly mind-boggling.

Oh, the IRONY!!!

 

[Liability]

Romney is a place marker. They don't want or need him to think, he just needs to be able to sign the papers put in front of him.

If Obumbles is anything more than the front man for the actual powers that be, then it would stand to reason he would DO some of the things he SAID he was gonna do.

Like that time he closed Gitmo!

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Romney Refuses to Respond To Merits of Supreme Court Decision | Arizona Law

The Conservative standard bearer is a disgrace to principle. Romney refused to take this opportunity to respond to the merits of teh Supreme Court decision on Arizona's immigration law case.

All Mitty Von Flipflop has done is criticize the President and throw raw meat to teh conservative base which is frothing at the mouth for blood.

Politicians respond to Supreme Court rulings – CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs

"Today's decision underscores the need for a President who will lead on this critical issue and work in a bipartisan fashion to pursue a national immigration strategy. President Obama has failed to provide any leadership on immigration. This represents yet another broken promise by this President. I believe that each state has the duty–and the right–to secure our borders and preserve the rule of law, particularly when the federal government has failed to meet its responsibilities. As Candidate Obama, he promised to present an immigration plan during his first year in office. But 4 years later, we are still waiting."

What a loser. Romney is nothing but a vapid political opportunist who will do or say anything in order to become The First Mormon President

What he said is spot on.

What is it about what he said that is troubling you?

What is it you people fail to comprehend?

Romney Refuses to Respond To Merits of Supreme Court Decision | Arizona Law

Romney responded with lame political statements and ran away as fast as he could from being asked to act and speak like a leader.

Leaders lead, dipshits like Romney take their fingers out of their asses in order to determine which way the political winds are blowing.

The merits of the case were not addressed in Romney's statement.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Scalia has been using the Court as a public platform for his ideological views. Maybe he needs to be impeached?

He does bring to a close the notion that justice is blind and the scales are balanced.

I don't understand your thinking We have laws on the books why is The Lawless One fighting not too enforce them?

you'd probably need to read up on US History and Government to understand the complexities of Constitutional Powers and struggles between branches of government.

sorry, no time to teach today