Let me begin by reminding everyone that arsenic, and cyanide, were the media’s choices for the Republican party’s nomination —— Mitt Romney in 2012 —— Jeb Bush in 2016. So what am I missing in the Trump v. Media championship bout if Donald Trump nominates a media choice for secretary of state? Answer: The fight is rigged.
Move the cursor to 12:00 to hear Matt Schlapp accurately define Mitt Romney’s loyalty:
I am not too keen on Tony Sayegh’s interpretation on the issue of Mitt Romney becoming secretary of state. Sayegh’s view is the same old establishment Republican horses manure that conservatives voted against. If Trump is going to curl up with the same old crowd personified by Mitt Romney it is truly time for Tea Parties to form a conservative party third party that will draw voters from Democrats and Republicans. Anything short of a truly conservative party will result in a continuation of conservative ideals being promised and ignored as conservative voters bounce back and forth between the two parties. That has been the federal government’s election strategy in every election since the LBJ days.
Remember the campaign
Every Republican wannabe was trying to convince voters that he, and he alone, was the true conservative. They all knew that they could not beat Hillary Clinton without the conservative vote. Donald Trump beat them all to the finish line. It is too late to dump Trump if he turns out to be just another lying Karl Rove Republican, but conservatives can sure as hell treat him on the Internet the same way they would have treated Hillary Clinton had she won.
Parenthetically, Mitt Romney is a New World Order guy. When it comes to America’s sovereignty there is not a whit of difference between him and every secretary of state after 1988. On the day Trump actually nominates Mitt Romney I am running for the hills:
Finally, Lou Dobbs plays the conservative to the hilt, but he is not all that swift either. Go back to the video and listen to him fawning all over:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/healthcare-insurance-govt-healthcare/255627-barbers-and-doctors.html
Move the cursor to 12:00 to hear Matt Schlapp accurately define Mitt Romney’s loyalty:
I am not too keen on Tony Sayegh’s interpretation on the issue of Mitt Romney becoming secretary of state. Sayegh’s view is the same old establishment Republican horses manure that conservatives voted against. If Trump is going to curl up with the same old crowd personified by Mitt Romney it is truly time for Tea Parties to form a conservative party third party that will draw voters from Democrats and Republicans. Anything short of a truly conservative party will result in a continuation of conservative ideals being promised and ignored as conservative voters bounce back and forth between the two parties. That has been the federal government’s election strategy in every election since the LBJ days.
Remember the campaign
Every Republican wannabe was trying to convince voters that he, and he alone, was the true conservative. They all knew that they could not beat Hillary Clinton without the conservative vote. Donald Trump beat them all to the finish line. It is too late to dump Trump if he turns out to be just another lying Karl Rove Republican, but conservatives can sure as hell treat him on the Internet the same way they would have treated Hillary Clinton had she won.
Parenthetically, Mitt Romney is a New World Order guy. When it comes to America’s sovereignty there is not a whit of difference between him and every secretary of state after 1988. On the day Trump actually nominates Mitt Romney I am running for the hills:
Just to be clear on this. Had Trump not staked a claim on sovereignty, I would not go near him if I was wearing a Hazmat suit:
Finally, Lou Dobbs plays the conservative to the hilt, but he is not all that swift either. Go back to the video and listen to him fawning all over:
Absentee owners
My cost-cutting reforms also said that every medical industry entity traded on Wall Street —— the casino not the thoroughfare —— be prohibited from receiving healthcare dollars directly or indirectly. Don’t bother calculating the odds on that reform being picked up by Congress? It is a non-starter. No law curtailing even the most destructive form of absentee ownership will ever be passed in this country.
Put it this way: If companies building gas chambers and furnaces for the same purposes they were built in Nazi Germany were traded on Wall Street no law would stop them if it adversely affected absentee ownership. Note that federal bureaucracies in cahoots with federal and state courts have all but abolished real property Rights. At the same time property Rights are being wiped out the courts have strengthened the Rights of absentee owners.
My cost-cutting reforms also said that every medical industry entity traded on Wall Street —— the casino not the thoroughfare —— be prohibited from receiving healthcare dollars directly or indirectly. Don’t bother calculating the odds on that reform being picked up by Congress? It is a non-starter. No law curtailing even the most destructive form of absentee ownership will ever be passed in this country.
Put it this way: If companies building gas chambers and furnaces for the same purposes they were built in Nazi Germany were traded on Wall Street no law would stop them if it adversely affected absentee ownership. Note that federal bureaucracies in cahoots with federal and state courts have all but abolished real property Rights. At the same time property Rights are being wiped out the courts have strengthened the Rights of absentee owners.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/healthcare-insurance-govt-healthcare/255627-barbers-and-doctors.html