Skull Pilot
Diamond Member
- Nov 17, 2007
- 45,446
- 6,164
- 1,830
OK what you don't seem to understand is that if a law is passed then it is LEGAL therefore the congress members aren't doing anything ILLEGAL either. So how are they "criminals" when they arenlt doing anything ILLEGAL?
Making it LEGAL it benefits both congress and Joe Business and they are both taking advantage of it therefore if one is "guilty" then both are "guilty" Furthermore, why would congress members pass such a law if Joe Business wasn't a willing participant as he buys their influence and support? They are both integral parts of a corrupt system and they BOTH contribute to it so they are both "quilty"
nope they didn't "pass" them but they did BUY them. Without their money there would be no reason to pass such laws.
The biggest flaw in your argument is that you are intent on calling congress members "criminals" for selling their votes and support but you refuse to apply that same standard to the BUYER of that now legel "product." If one party is guilty for selling it then by engaging in the same criminal enterprise so is the buyer.
They are criminals in every sense of the word. They exist to take our money from us and make themselves rich in the process. They do this by writing and passing laws that only apply to them.
They are the criminal elite.
There would be no legal graft if congress didn't first pass laws that apply only to them.
OMG. If they pass laws to make it LEGAL then it is NOT ILLEGAL. LOL
However, if you argument is that it is a crime then ALL participants are guilty including joe business.
The fact that you continue to exclude joe business shows that your argument is flawed repeating it over and over again willl not validate it.
IF IT"S ILLEGAL FOR US IT SHOULD BE ILLEGAL FOR THEM
Or are you too fucking ovine minded to get that
Last edited: