Romney Getting More In Focus! 51% Unfavorable Rating; Only 4% Undecided!

Discussion in 'Election Forums' started by mascale, Oct 17, 2012.

  1. mascale

    mascale VIP Member

    Feb 22, 2009
    Thanks Received:
    Trophy Points:
    Looking at the various approval rating polls of Obama and Romney: One major message is clear. The greater the familiarity with Romney, the Lesser the Undecided opinion. More or less consistently, 50% or more of voters have an unfavorable opinion of the RNC nominee!

    Mitt Romney. Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable impression? (Among registered voters) - The Washington Post

    The job approval ratings of President Obama, in contrast, are heading more to the 51% that Romney seems to be holding in his own lack of favorability ratings. Mostly, the collective pysche understands the Governor to be some nature of son-of-a-bitch. Up until hours ago, in fact, he had been making higher marks among the "Critters in the Binders(?)!" Probably they squirmed, and wiggled all during his term(?)!

    A Lake Research poll, probably DNC, then found that women picked Obama as the recent debate winner, 56-36%. Men were 49% to 43% saying Obama won. Up until Tuesday, Romney had been gaining a more favorable rating, mostly among female people.

    Now there is momm again(?) to contend with!

    "Born Again(?)!" continues to not be a Romney strong suit, in any showing at all. Continually discussing the business background, likely conjures up the old RNC reliance on suitcases all filled with money!

    "Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
    (Usually, the people are asked to believe that their nominee is not a crook, or even of the same political party. . .as that fellow that President Ford finally pardoned!)
    Last edited: Oct 17, 2012
  2. ScienceRocks

    ScienceRocks Democrat all the way!

    Mar 16, 2010
    Thanks Received:
    Trophy Points:
    The Good insane United states of America
    Yet Americans can support Obama????

    Read all about it...Obama spins and lies!!!!

    Time line of lies!

    Obama's Benghazi Lies - Home

    Destroys Obama's case. It wasn't about a fucking terrorist attack, BUT the protest over our freedom of speech.

    On the 13th he was talking about the protest when he said terrorized.

    Susan Rice said on the 16th that this wasn't a pre-planned attack. LIES

    On the 18th Obama went on the letterman show and blamed our first amendment for the attack. LIES!!!

    If the terrorized was supposed to mean a terrorist attack. Well, Obama sure inserted his foot in his ass.

    Clinton on the 21st was the first to say it was a Terrorist attack. SPIN!

    Obama on the view on the 25th said it was about the fucking video! Spin some more!!!

    [ame=]Carney maintains Libya attack was not preplanned - YouTube[/ame]

    [ame=]Who is responsible for the attack in Benghazi? - YouTube[/ame]

    Biden blatantly lied about Chris Stevens wanting more Security
    The Fact Checker

    “We weren’t told they wanted more security there. We did not know they wanted more security.”

    — Biden, speaking of the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya

    Biden’s bold statement was directly contradicted by State Department officials just this week, in testimony before a congressional panel and in unclassified cables released by a congressional committee.

    “All of us at post were in sync that we wanted these resources,” said Eric Nordstrom, the top regional security officer in Libya earlier this year. A Utah national guardsman who led a security team, Lt. Col. Andrew Wood, said: “We felt great frustration that those requests were ignored or just never met.”
  3. Leweman

    Leweman Gold Member

    Aug 5, 2010
    Thanks Received:
    Trophy Points:
    I wonder what it would be without the media filter? Same for Obama.
  4. LordBrownTrout

    LordBrownTrout Gold Member

    Nov 25, 2007
    Thanks Received:
    Trophy Points:
    South Texas

Share This Page