Rittenhouse lawyer rips CNN, MSNBC for false reporting, botching 'basic facts'

DigitalDrifter

Diamond Member
Feb 22, 2013
47,604
25,963
2,605
Oregon
Have any of them recanted their stories claiming Rittenhouse crossed state lines with a firearm?


The mainstream media is under fire for alleged false reporting throughout the Kyle Rittenhouse murder trial and defense lawyer Mark Richards confirmed with NewsNation Now that coverage from some outlets was just plain wrong.

"Much of the coverage at the beginning was wrong," he told "Banfield" host Ashleigh Banfield, who previously worked for CNN, Sunday. "The trial proved that."

Richards mentioned outlets like CNN and MSNBC who blatantly spread misinformation, such as MSNBC host Joe Scarborough detailing that Rittenhouse shot his firearm 60 times.

 
Another compromise of the 1st. amendment, but this time censoring the media's right to voice their opinion?
Maybe the time has come to stop claiming the 1st. amendment lies?
 
It'll take years for all the lawsuits to be resolved and by then if liberals remain power the millions of dollars Rittenhouse collects might buy him a loaf of bread. But not designer rye break. Just plain (gasp!) white.
 
Another compromise of the 1st. amendment, but this time censoring the media's right to voice their opinion?
Maybe the time has come to stop claiming the 1st. amendment lies?
The First Amendment doesn't give people or organizations the right to Libel someone for fun or profit. Maybe you should stick to Canadian law since you are universally wrong when you opine of American law.
 
The First Amendment doesn't give people or organizations the right to Libel someone for fun or profit. Maybe you should stick to Canadian law since you are universally wrong when you opine of American law.
Ever watch Absence of Malice? It's based on a true story.
 
Another compromise of the 1st. amendment, but this time censoring the media's right to voice their opinion?
Maybe the time has come to stop claiming the 1st. amendment lies?
I see you know little about the 1st. Amendment, fool. Bull Shit is not protected.
 
The First Amendment doesn't give people or organizations the right to Libel someone for fun or profit. Maybe you should stick to Canadian law since you are universally wrong when you opine of American law.
Yes it does but then those who are libeled have the right to sue. Kinda like people claiming we don't have the right to yell fire in a crowded theater. Yes we have the right but may suffer the legal consequences after the fact. The laws don't say you can't do this or that they say there are consequences if you do. It may be nit picking on my part but legally it's important nit picking.
 
The First Amendment doesn't give people or organizations the right to Libel someone for fun or profit. Maybe you should stick to Canadian law since you are universally wrong when you opine of American law.
I think he is more well-versed in Sharia.

He and the leftists may share the same agenda of destroying western civilization, but he wants Islam to replace it, not Stalinism.
 

Forum List

Back
Top