Right of Return Conference

[P F Tinmore]

Discusses the legalities of the right of return. Also talks about "Birthright Palestine."

 

[USAF 2023]

Good idea ! One more reason why there will never be a " state" that the Palestinians will accept .

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

There is no "right of return", nor will one be created. The Israelis are not stupid.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

They should return, to Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Iran etc.........

 

[USAF 2023]

According to the " Arab Initiative" there are over Eight Million Palestinians who have the OPTION to return. Ask the Palestinian Poster why Israel should even consider this in " negotiating" ( lol) and there will be no response .

 

[Kondor3]

Right of Return Conference...

 

[USAF 2023]

In scanning the boards last year, there was this Racist Jew Hater Sheri. Where is she? Hope she got thrown off

 

[P F Tinmore]

Right of Return Conference...

That isn't the same conference.

Good try at lying though

 

[Kondor3]

Right of Return Conference...

That isn't the same conference.

Good try at lying though

Of COURSE it wasn't the same conference...

The podium and display screens up-front were different...

It wasn't "lying"...

It was a metaphor for "boring" and "low attendance", given that a similar audience-shot was not available online...

Gee, I wonder why?

Metaphorically speaking, the image, above, was probably close to accurate...

=========================================================

But here's a photo from the actual conference...

Looks like the "metaphorical" audience picture wasn't that far off, eh?

Oh, and...

Why is it, that the video-camera never pans to the audience area, as a panoramic view....hmmmmmm?

Is it because most of the frigging seats were empty?

Why do you bother the audience with an April 2013 sound-byte that never drew enough of a crowd to pay for the electricity and heating?

 

[Phoenall]

Discusses the legalities of the right of return. Also talks about "Birthright Palestine."

No such legal concept as right of return as it is against the human rights of the people living in a nation. That is why it can never be forced by legislation from third parties. Would you accept some foreign national claiming that your home was theirs because they say so, well that is the whole basis of the Palestinian claims of right of return

 

[Phoenall]

Right of Return Conference...

That isn't the same conference.

Good try at lying though

Where is the lie then as this clearly shows that right of return has no support because it is illegal.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Discusses the legalities of the right of return. Also talks about "Birthright Palestine."

No such legal concept as right of return as it is against the human rights of the people living in a nation. That is why it can never be forced by legislation from third parties. Would you accept some foreign national claiming that your home was theirs because they say so, well that is the whole basis of the Palestinian claims of right of return

Actually it guarantees the rights of people living in a nation.

 

[Phoenall]

Discusses the legalities of the right of return. Also talks about "Birthright Palestine."

No such legal concept as right of return as it is against the human rights of the people living in a nation. That is why it can never be forced by legislation from third parties. Would you accept some foreign national claiming that your home was theirs because they say so, well that is the whole basis of the Palestinian claims of right of return

Actually it guarantees the rights of people living in a nation.

Nope it guarantees nothing as this shows



Right of return - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


By contrast the right of return has not passed into customary international law, although it remains an important aspirational human right. Instead, international law gives each country the right to decide for itself to whom it will give citizenship


No nation can be forced to accept any person as a citizen that they deem to be unfit to enter the country. This means that foreign nationals that are enemies of the state can have their citizenship taken away from them and deported/evicted and not allowed back in. Which is why they cant be Palestinians and Israeli's, they can be one or the other and have to give up one of their nationalities.

 

[Kondor3]

...Actually it guarantees the rights of people living in a nation.

Now, all you need are a People and a Nation, and you're in business.

Oh, and, by the way, it doesn't guarantee shit.

If it did, we would not be having this conversation.

Money talks, and bullshit walks.

 

[Challenger]

Discusses the legalities of the right of return. Also talks about "Birthright Palestine."

Interesting, thanks for sharing.

Found this, related to the above:

"In an attack on a Right of Return conference held at Boston University last weekend, one Richard Cravatts, a Boston-based Zionist propagandist, expressed his horror in The Times of Israel. Echoing standard Zionist arguments, he stated that "no population of refugees has ever presumed that the right of return - if such a right even exists - could be claimed, not only by the original refugees, but also by all of their descendants". Cravatts, like many Zionists who deny the right of the Palestinians to return, seems to have forgotten that it is European Jews, as fictional descedants of the supposed Hebrew refugees of the first century, who have "presumed" that very right in the name of which they colonised and colonise Palestine. While for Zionism Jewish "return" is the very condition of colonisation, Israel understands very well that the return of the actual Palestinian refugees and their descendants means nothing short of decolonisation and the undoing of the Zionist project. Israel's leaders are of course correct in their assessment.

It should be noted here that international law's understanding of the rights of refugees includes the rights of their descendants to return. In addition to the annual UN reassertion of the Palestinian refugees' right of return, the right of return was upheld in principle and practice after the Bosnian War. Upwards of half a million refugees and internally displaced persons returned with international assistance, following the 1995 Dayton Agreement, to their homes to areas in Bosnia (a country of three and a half million people) dominated demographically and politically by members of another ethnic community. As the Bosnian case clearly demonstates, the right of return of the refugees trumped the racially separatist policies of the local authorities who sought to continue to control the land of the diaplaced refugees and to populate it demographically with their own ethnic group at the expense of the refugees. International enforcement of the Bosnian refugees' right of return was based on the well-established right of return of refugees in international law and UN resolutions, while demographic racial separatism had no moral or legal standing whatsoever in enforcing the refugees' rights of return.

The problem for Zionism and Israel is not the right of return, as that is central to their ideology and their colonial-settler project, but rather with who is allowed to be a right-of-return-bearing subject."--Dr. Joseph Massad, from their Facebook page.

 

[Phoenall]

Discusses the legalities of the right of return. Also talks about "Birthright Palestine."

Interesting, thanks for sharing.

Found this, related to the above:

"In an attack on a Right of Return conference held at Boston University last weekend, one Richard Cravatts, a Boston-based Zionist propagandist, expressed his horror in The Times of Israel. Echoing standard Zionist arguments, he stated that "no population of refugees has ever presumed that the right of return - if such a right even exists - could be claimed, not only by the original refugees, but also by all of their descendants". Cravatts, like many Zionists who deny the right of the Palestinians to return, seems to have forgotten that it is European Jews, as fictional descedants of the supposed Hebrew refugees of the first century, who have "presumed" that very right in the name of which they colonised and colonise Palestine. While for Zionism Jewish "return" is the very condition of colonisation, Israel understands very well that the return of the actual Palestinian refugees and their descendants means nothing short of decolonisation and the undoing of the Zionist project. Israel's leaders are of course correct in their assessment.

It should be noted here that international law's understanding of the rights of refugees includes the rights of their descendants to return. In addition to the annual UN reassertion of the Palestinian refugees' right of return, the right of return was upheld in principle and practice after the Bosnian War. Upwards of half a million refugees and internally displaced persons returned with international assistance, following the 1995 Dayton Agreement, to their homes to areas in Bosnia (a country of three and a half million people) dominated demographically and politically by members of another ethnic community. As the Bosnian case clearly demonstates, the right of return of the refugees trumped the racially separatist policies of the local authorities who sought to continue to control the land of the diaplaced refugees and to populate it demographically with their own ethnic group at the expense of the refugees. International enforcement of the Bosnian refugees' right of return was based on the well-established right of return of refugees in international law and UN resolutions, while demographic racial separatism had no moral or legal standing whatsoever in enforcing the refugees' rights of return.

The problem for Zionism and Israel is not the right of return, as that is central to their ideology and their colonial-settler project, but rather with who is allowed to be a right-of-return-bearing subject."--Dr. Joseph Massad, from their Facebook page.

Just more of your RACIST JEW HATRED by using the term Zionist out of context and not as it is defined. There is no concept in International law of a right of return, if there is then the arab muslims are on land outside of Saudi arabia illegally and the original non muslim inhabitants should be given their lands back. This means that Jerusalem will be the Jewish capital and no arab muslims will be in existence. Or do you still believe that the laws don't apply to the Jews because of your RACIST JEW HATRED




And how about a link to your cut and paste ? Or are you afraid of showing that you are a RABID RACIST and that it is your words that you have added to the cut and paste to incite racial hatred and violence against the Jews.

 

[Challenger]

Discusses the legalities of the right of return. Also talks about "Birthright Palestine."

Interesting, thanks for sharing.

Found this, related to the above:

"In an attack on a Right of Return conference held at Boston University last weekend, one Richard Cravatts, a Boston-based Zionist propagandist, expressed his horror in The Times of Israel. Echoing standard Zionist arguments, he stated that "no population of refugees has ever presumed that the right of return - if such a right even exists - could be claimed, not only by the original refugees, but also by all of their descendants". Cravatts, like many Zionists who deny the right of the Palestinians to return, seems to have forgotten that it is European Jews, as fictional descedants of the supposed Hebrew refugees of the first century, who have "presumed" that very right in the name of which they colonised and colonise Palestine. While for Zionism Jewish "return" is the very condition of colonisation, Israel understands very well that the return of the actual Palestinian refugees and their descendants means nothing short of decolonisation and the undoing of the Zionist project. Israel's leaders are of course correct in their assessment.

It should be noted here that international law's understanding of the rights of refugees includes the rights of their descendants to return. In addition to the annual UN reassertion of the Palestinian refugees' right of return, the right of return was upheld in principle and practice after the Bosnian War. Upwards of half a million refugees and internally displaced persons returned with international assistance, following the 1995 Dayton Agreement, to their homes to areas in Bosnia (a country of three and a half million people) dominated demographically and politically by members of another ethnic community. As the Bosnian case clearly demonstates, the right of return of the refugees trumped the racially separatist policies of the local authorities who sought to continue to control the land of the diaplaced refugees and to populate it demographically with their own ethnic group at the expense of the refugees. International enforcement of the Bosnian refugees' right of return was based on the well-established right of return of refugees in international law and UN resolutions, while demographic racial separatism had no moral or legal standing whatsoever in enforcing the refugees' rights of return.

The problem for Zionism and Israel is not the right of return, as that is central to their ideology and their colonial-settler project, but rather with who is allowed to be a right-of-return-bearing subject."--Dr. Joseph Massad, from their Facebook page.

Just more of your RACIST JEW HATRED by using the term Zionist out of context and not as it is defined. There is no concept in International law of a right of return, if there is then the arab muslims are on land outside of Saudi arabia illegally and the original non muslim inhabitants should be given their lands back. This means that Jerusalem will be the Jewish capital and no arab muslims will be in existence. Or do you still believe that the laws don't apply to the Jews because of your RACIST JEW HATRED

And how about a link to your cut and paste ? Or are you afraid of showing that you are a RABID RACIST and that it is your words that you have added to the cut and paste to incite racial hatred and violence against the Jews.

Go into your Facbook account, type in "Right of Return Conference" and scroll down the messages, interesting reading for the most part.

 

[MJB12741]

Let us all join together & pray for a right of return for the Palestinians back to their native homelands. LET THERE BE PEACE ALREADY!

 

[Challenger]

Let us all join together & pray for a right of return for the Palestinians back to their native homelands. LET THERE BE PEACE ALREADY!

...and the Zionists to their's.

 

[Phoenall]

Discusses the legalities of the right of return. Also talks about "Birthright Palestine."

Interesting, thanks for sharing.

Found this, related to the above:

"In an attack on a Right of Return conference held at Boston University last weekend, one Richard Cravatts, a Boston-based Zionist propagandist, expressed his horror in The Times of Israel. Echoing standard Zionist arguments, he stated that "no population of refugees has ever presumed that the right of return - if such a right even exists - could be claimed, not only by the original refugees, but also by all of their descendants". Cravatts, like many Zionists who deny the right of the Palestinians to return, seems to have forgotten that it is European Jews, as fictional descedants of the supposed Hebrew refugees of the first century, who have "presumed" that very right in the name of which they colonised and colonise Palestine. While for Zionism Jewish "return" is the very condition of colonisation, Israel understands very well that the return of the actual Palestinian refugees and their descendants means nothing short of decolonisation and the undoing of the Zionist project. Israel's leaders are of course correct in their assessment.

It should be noted here that international law's understanding of the rights of refugees includes the rights of their descendants to return. In addition to the annual UN reassertion of the Palestinian refugees' right of return, the right of return was upheld in principle and practice after the Bosnian War. Upwards of half a million refugees and internally displaced persons returned with international assistance, following the 1995 Dayton Agreement, to their homes to areas in Bosnia (a country of three and a half million people) dominated demographically and politically by members of another ethnic community. As the Bosnian case clearly demonstates, the right of return of the refugees trumped the racially separatist policies of the local authorities who sought to continue to control the land of the diaplaced refugees and to populate it demographically with their own ethnic group at the expense of the refugees. International enforcement of the Bosnian refugees' right of return was based on the well-established right of return of refugees in international law and UN resolutions, while demographic racial separatism had no moral or legal standing whatsoever in enforcing the refugees' rights of return.

The problem for Zionism and Israel is not the right of return, as that is central to their ideology and their colonial-settler project, but rather with who is allowed to be a right-of-return-bearing subject."--Dr. Joseph Massad, from their Facebook page.

Just more of your RACIST JEW HATRED by using the term Zionist out of context and not as it is defined. There is no concept in International law of a right of return, if there is then the arab muslims are on land outside of Saudi arabia illegally and the original non muslim inhabitants should be given their lands back. This means that Jerusalem will be the Jewish capital and no arab muslims will be in existence. Or do you still believe that the laws don't apply to the Jews because of your RACIST JEW HATRED




And how about a link to your cut and paste ? Or are you afraid of showing that you are a RABID RACIST and that it is your words that you have added to the cut and paste to incite racial hatred and violence against the Jews.

What cut and paste is that then ?

Afraid to show yours is a RACIST source and does not include the word Zionist..................... what a nasty, devious, RACIST POS you are