emilynghiem
Constitutionalist / Universalist
Hello John and Tea Party Patriots:
1. May I suggest we start with a focus on recognizing "political creeds" as protected under the Constitution.
This would allow ALL creeds to be recognized and no longer discriminated against as threats to the creeds of others.
2. Another area where we can avoid having to disintegrate ties altogether:
by creating a third level of law enforcement within each State (can be on purely a voluntary basis such as how Parties operate or Media networks), specifically to identify address and mediate conflicts between political and religious beliefs, then citizens of each state can access training, education and assistance in defending Constitutional protections on the State level (or local) without having to call in the federal govt.
This is especially important in cities like Houston which have shown no responsibility or commitment
to follow and uphold Constitutional protections.
Can we start with a local Constitutional convention for Houston's districts, and see if this Constitutional level of conflict resolution can be organized on a smaller scale? Then if we can make a local model work, we can propose that to the State of Texas to try it among major cities and counties.
3. This may or may not lead to creating an official level of law besides just civil and criminal; but could remain
as just a consulting network where people of all parties can engage in resolving conflicts BEFORE presenting our proposed solutions to the OFFICIAL government agencies and bodies to introduce as public laws and reforms.
With the issues of legalization, gay marriage, and health care, I propose that we set up some means of separating people by PARTY so that each group can exercise their own partisan and political beliefs, without imposing on or requiring approval of other parties that can practice their own beliefs. This would prevent imposing "beliefs" about the right to marriage, health care, etc. on the public by recognizing political creeds similar to religions that cannot be forced by law on people of dissenting beliefs.
Thank you very much,
Yours truly,
Emily Nghiem
National Freedmen's Town District
Freedmen s Town Historic Churches and Vet Housing
Given the massive political backlash over the Houston Equal Rights Ordinance,
can we please look at organizing a local Constitutional Convention first? If the City
does not agree to revise the City charter to include enforcing Constitutional laws and mediating conflicts
to prevent legal costs and actions, I propose to set up business plans for all the districts to have the option
for incorporating as independent towns (including buying out their local schools and creating programs for educating all residents in law enforcement procedures, business management and property development to become self-reliant) where the City is only in charge of basic maintenance and security while any civic or social policy decisions are decided democratically per district.
My argument for this is that for citizens to be "equal" requires education and experience
directly in owning and managing property and districts under locally elected government, where communities are in charge of their own cities, where property and sales taxes going to their administrations. Otherwise, if citizens are always reliant on "other people" running government, they will never be fully equal to people with such experience.
If we can organize self-government on the city and state levels, we can manage the full range of diversity of religious, political and cultural values while staying united as a nation.
http://www.ethics-commission.net
1. May I suggest we start with a focus on recognizing "political creeds" as protected under the Constitution.
This would allow ALL creeds to be recognized and no longer discriminated against as threats to the creeds of others.
2. Another area where we can avoid having to disintegrate ties altogether:
by creating a third level of law enforcement within each State (can be on purely a voluntary basis such as how Parties operate or Media networks), specifically to identify address and mediate conflicts between political and religious beliefs, then citizens of each state can access training, education and assistance in defending Constitutional protections on the State level (or local) without having to call in the federal govt.
This is especially important in cities like Houston which have shown no responsibility or commitment
to follow and uphold Constitutional protections.
Can we start with a local Constitutional convention for Houston's districts, and see if this Constitutional level of conflict resolution can be organized on a smaller scale? Then if we can make a local model work, we can propose that to the State of Texas to try it among major cities and counties.
3. This may or may not lead to creating an official level of law besides just civil and criminal; but could remain
as just a consulting network where people of all parties can engage in resolving conflicts BEFORE presenting our proposed solutions to the OFFICIAL government agencies and bodies to introduce as public laws and reforms.
With the issues of legalization, gay marriage, and health care, I propose that we set up some means of separating people by PARTY so that each group can exercise their own partisan and political beliefs, without imposing on or requiring approval of other parties that can practice their own beliefs. This would prevent imposing "beliefs" about the right to marriage, health care, etc. on the public by recognizing political creeds similar to religions that cannot be forced by law on people of dissenting beliefs.
Thank you very much,
Yours truly,
Emily Nghiem
National Freedmen's Town District
Freedmen s Town Historic Churches and Vet Housing
Given the massive political backlash over the Houston Equal Rights Ordinance,
can we please look at organizing a local Constitutional Convention first? If the City
does not agree to revise the City charter to include enforcing Constitutional laws and mediating conflicts
to prevent legal costs and actions, I propose to set up business plans for all the districts to have the option
for incorporating as independent towns (including buying out their local schools and creating programs for educating all residents in law enforcement procedures, business management and property development to become self-reliant) where the City is only in charge of basic maintenance and security while any civic or social policy decisions are decided democratically per district.
My argument for this is that for citizens to be "equal" requires education and experience
directly in owning and managing property and districts under locally elected government, where communities are in charge of their own cities, where property and sales taxes going to their administrations. Otherwise, if citizens are always reliant on "other people" running government, they will never be fully equal to people with such experience.
If we can organize self-government on the city and state levels, we can manage the full range of diversity of religious, political and cultural values while staying united as a nation.
http://www.ethics-commission.net