Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It seems the republican masses dont care what the republican party does to win elections.
I wonder why the "liberal" media refuses to report on these repeted criminal acts against American voters?
That's a damned shame
ADAMS: Inside the Black Panther case - Washington Times
On the day President Obama was elected, armed men wearing the black berets and jackboots of the New Black Panther Party were stationed at the entrance to a polling place in Philadelphia. They brandished a weapon and intimidated voters and poll watchers. After the election, the Justice Department brought a voter-intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party and those armed thugs. I and other Justice attorneys diligently pursued the case and obtained an entry of default after the defendants ignored the charges. Before a final judgment could be entered in May 2009, our superiors ordered us to dismiss the case.
The New Black Panther case was the simplest and most obvious violation of federal law I saw in my Justice Department career. Because of the corrupt nature of the dismissal, statements falsely characterizing the case and, most of all, indefensible orders for the career attorneys not to comply with lawful subpoenas investigating the dismissal, this month I resigned my position as a Department of Justice (DOJ) attorney.
The federal voter-intimidation statutes we used against the New Black Panthers were enacted because America never realized genuine racial equality in elections. Threats of violence characterized elections from the end of the Civil War until the passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965. Before the Voting Rights Act, blacks seeking the right to vote, and those aiding them, were victims of violence and intimidation. But unlike the Southern legal system, Southern violence did not discriminate. Black voters were slain, as were the white champions of their cause. Some of the bodies were tossed into bogs and in one case in Philadelphia, Miss., they were buried together in an earthen dam....
so you people are going to refuse to address the subject of the thread?
The facts you dont like you just pretend dont exsist?
The repugs are still bound by the consent, yes.so you people are going to refuse to address the subject of the thread?
The facts you dont like you just pretend dont exsist?
D.N.J.: Republican National Committee Still Bound by Consent Decree Prohibiting Voter Suppression — NSCLC Website
As for the public interest, the court found overwhelmingly that instances of voter fraud were dwarfed by voter suppression. Specifically, the type of voter fraud that the decree prevents the RNC from combating through voter caging and intimidation at the polls, in-person fraud, is practically nonexistent. Conversely, the court noted that there is ample evidence of the potential and prevalence of voter suppression, such as that recently documented by the Supreme Court in Bartlett v. Strickland, 129 S.Ct. 1231 (2009).
How is it the media never lets us know about these cases?
Because they are 30 years out of date?
No it is not, I guess you failed to read teh link huh?
in the 20 years since they were caught they have broken the dercee repetedly.
That's a damned shame
ADAMS: Inside the Black Panther case - Washington Times
On the day President Obama was elected, armed men wearing the black berets and jackboots of the New Black Panther Party were stationed at the entrance to a polling place in Philadelphia. They brandished a weapon and intimidated voters and poll watchers. After the election, the Justice Department brought a voter-intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party and those armed thugs. I and other Justice attorneys diligently pursued the case and obtained an entry of default after the defendants ignored the charges. Before a final judgment could be entered in May 2009, our superiors ordered us to dismiss the case.
The New Black Panther case was the simplest and most obvious violation of federal law I saw in my Justice Department career. Because of the corrupt nature of the dismissal, statements falsely characterizing the case and, most of all, indefensible orders for the career attorneys not to comply with lawful subpoenas investigating the dismissal, this month I resigned my position as a Department of Justice (DOJ) attorney.
The federal voter-intimidation statutes we used against the New Black Panthers were enacted because America never realized genuine racial equality in elections. Threats of violence characterized elections from the end of the Civil War until the passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965. Before the Voting Rights Act, blacks seeking the right to vote, and those aiding them, were victims of violence and intimidation. But unlike the Southern legal system, Southern violence did not discriminate. Black voters were slain, as were the white champions of their cause. Some of the bodies were tossed into bogs and in one case in Philadelphia, Miss., they were buried together in an earthen dam....
Democrats love having black people vote. So much so that they even want dead black people and black people convicted of felonies to vote too!
Democrats love having black people vote. So much so that they even want dead black people and black people convicted of felonies to vote too!
You do realise that what you said is unprovable right?
I gave cold hard court documented facts that republicans have sought to CHEAT in elections by keeping black people from voting.
To you its just a peachy idea huh?
Willow , supporting republican crime for decades
Democrats love having black people vote. So much so that they even want dead black people and black people convicted of felonies to vote too!
You do realise that what you said is unprovable right?
I gave cold hard court documented facts that republicans have sought to CHEAT in elections by keeping black people from voting.
To you its just a peachy idea huh?
D.N.J.: Republican National Committee Still Bound by Consent Decree Prohibiting Voter Suppression — NSCLC Website
As for the public interest, the court found overwhelmingly that instances of voter fraud were dwarfed by voter suppression. Specifically, the type of voter fraud that the decree prevents the RNC from combating through voter caging and intimidation at the polls, in-person fraud, is practically nonexistent. Conversely, the court noted that there is ample evidence of the potential and prevalence of voter suppression, such as that recently documented by the Supreme Court in Bartlett v. Strickland, 129 S.Ct. 1231 (2009).
How is it the media never lets us know about these cases?
http://brennan.3cdn.net/484c0b5d69fb0379c1_kzm6b9f2t.pdf
Here is the consent drecreee itsself.
How fucked up does a party have to be for its monions to deny court documented proof of your paties crimes?
http://brennan.3cdn.net/484c0b5d69fb0379c1_kzm6b9f2t.pdf
Here is the consent drecreee itsself.
How fucked up does a party have to be for its monions to deny court documented proof of your paties crimes?
