Report says global climate deal hinges on Obama reelection

[LordBrownTrout]

Anyway, its just not possible for mankind to destroy the earth.

Sure there is. Set off thousands of nukes around the planet and we'll destroy it in no time. CO2 sure as hell isn't doing it, though.

Nukes wouldnt destroy the physical planet. The earth would just recycle itself through subduction. CO2 will definitely not destroy the planet. CO2 is essential for life.

 

[daveman]

Earth as a whole has a demand for products that harm our atmosphere. Even if we stop making trinket A, someone else will make it to fill the demand. Thus the only thing that changes is we, as a nation, get left behind.

Don't be silly, Grampa. Everybody knows that only the trinkets America makes are harmful.

Right, USMB lefties?

 

[Charles_Main]

I agree with HSBC. But I also think a lost climate deal would only be one of the casualties of a Republican President.

Yeah, we're hoping his healthcare monstrosity and all his EPA regulations will also be on the chopping block.

That's precisely why we need him out of there.

They would all be on the chopping block with a Republican President. You're right.

It's sad though that you think that's a good thing.

What is sad is that you think the only solutions are Obama's Big Government solutions.

 

[daveman]

Still waiting for someone to name a replacement for the 50% of power generation capacity that comes from coal.

 

[Charles_Main]

Still waiting for someone to name a replacement for the 50% of power generation capacity that comes from coal.

It's actually 78% according to the DOE.

 

[Charles_Main]

Anyway, its just not possible for mankind to destroy the earth.

Sure there is. Set off thousands of nukes around the planet and we'll destroy it in no time. CO2 sure as hell isn't doing it, though.

Nukes wouldnt destroy the physical planet. The earth would just recycle itself through subduction. CO2 will definitely not destroy the planet. CO2 is essential for life.

Anyone who tries to say CO2, One of the most basic, and essential Chemicals for Life, Is destroying the planet, is a fucking loon.

 

[DontBeStupid]

Sure there is. Set off thousands of nukes around the planet and we'll destroy it in no time. CO2 sure as hell isn't doing it, though.

Nukes wouldnt destroy the physical planet. The earth would just recycle itself through subduction. CO2 will definitely not destroy the planet. CO2 is essential for life.

Anyone who tries to say CO2, One of the most basic, and essential Chemicals for Life, Is destroying the planet, is a fucking loon.

If I put you in a room and fill it with CO2, I guarantee you'll have a problem with it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Nukes wouldnt destroy the physical planet. The earth would just recycle itself through subduction. CO2 will definitely not destroy the planet. CO2 is essential for life.

Anyone who tries to say CO2, One of the most basic, and essential Chemicals for Life, Is destroying the planet, is a fucking loon.

If I put you in a room and fill it with CO2, I guarantee you'll have a problem with it.

I'm in a room with 390 ppm. Do I have a problem?

 

[DontBeStupid]

Anyone who tries to say CO2, One of the most basic, and essential Chemicals for Life, Is destroying the planet, is a fucking loon.

If I put you in a room and fill it with CO2, I guarantee you'll have a problem with it.

I'm in a room with 390 ppm. Do I have a problem?

I'm sure you know the answer to that. But to help you sleep at night, yes, you would be fine.

 

[Charles_Main]

Nukes wouldnt destroy the physical planet. The earth would just recycle itself through subduction. CO2 will definitely not destroy the planet. CO2 is essential for life.

Anyone who tries to say CO2, One of the most basic, and essential Chemicals for Life, Is destroying the planet, is a fucking loon.

If I put you in a room and fill it with CO2, I guarantee you'll have a problem with it.

And if you take to much CO2 away, the whole world will have a problems with it. CO2 is every bit as important to life on earth as Oxygen. Not only do plants need it to live, but the earth would be a Frozen waste land if not for the warming effect of CO2.

the only fools here are you Liberals who actually think you can Regulate the Gas that is expelled out of our mouths with every single breath.

 

[DontBeStupid]

Anyone who tries to say CO2, One of the most basic, and essential Chemicals for Life, Is destroying the planet, is a fucking loon.

If I put you in a room and fill it with CO2, I guarantee you'll have a problem with it.

And if you take to much CO2 away, the whole world will have a problems with it.

Correct.

And it's a good thing absolutely no one wants that to happen.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If I put you in a room and fill it with CO2, I guarantee you'll have a problem with it.

I'm in a room with 390 ppm. Do I have a problem?

I'm sure you know the answer to that. But to help you sleep at night, yes, you would be fine.

Excellent news! Would I be fine at 600 ppm?

 

[daveman]

Nukes wouldnt destroy the physical planet. The earth would just recycle itself through subduction. CO2 will definitely not destroy the planet. CO2 is essential for life.

Anyone who tries to say CO2, One of the most basic, and essential Chemicals for Life, Is destroying the planet, is a fucking loon.

If I put you in a room and fill it with CO2, I guarantee you'll have a problem with it.

Our atmosphere isn't filled with CO2, is it?

Carbon dioxide is so dangerous, but you keep exhaling it, you selfish bastard.

 

[DontBeStupid]

Anyone who tries to say CO2, One of the most basic, and essential Chemicals for Life, Is destroying the planet, is a fucking loon.

If I put you in a room and fill it with CO2, I guarantee you'll have a problem with it.

Our atmosphere isn't filled with CO2, is it?

Do you consider 0.039% "filled"?

 

[daveman]

If I put you in a room and fill it with CO2, I guarantee you'll have a problem with it.

Our atmosphere isn't filled with CO2, is it?

Do you consider 0.039% "filled"?

It's an awfully small number, isn't it?

Wait, are you still exhaling? Murderous bastard!

 

[DontBeStupid]

Our atmosphere isn't filled with CO2, is it?

Do you consider 0.039% "filled"?

It's an awfully small number, isn't it?

Wait, are you still exhaling? Murderous bastard!

It is a small number. Which is why a small change can have a large impact.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Do you consider 0.039% "filled"?

It's an awfully small number, isn't it?

Wait, are you still exhaling? Murderous bastard!

It is a small number. Which is why a small change can have a large impact.

Apparently you're not exhaling enough of it because you seem a bit off.

 

[bripat9643]

It's sad that anyone thinks destroying the American economy and converting this country to fascism is a good thing.

So now not poisoning our drinking water is considered fascism?

You're an idiot.

Our drinking water is perfectly safe. Obama wants us all riding bicycles to work and burning cow manure in our furnaces to heat our homes.

 

[bripat9643]

Are there scientific studies proving man-made climate change? Yes.

No.

Are there scientific studies proving God? No.

There are studies just as credible as the ones "proving" man-made climate change.

 

[bripat9643]

Nukes wouldnt destroy the physical planet. The earth would just recycle itself through subduction. CO2 will definitely not destroy the planet. CO2 is essential for life.

Anyone who tries to say CO2, One of the most basic, and essential Chemicals for Life, Is destroying the planet, is a fucking loon.

If I put you in a room and fill it with CO2, I guarantee you'll have a problem with it.

The same would be true if you filled it with water. Is H2O a poison?