REPORT: CIA Infiltrated Watergate Break-in as Nixon Threatened to Leak CIA Involvement in JFK Murder

[MAGA Macho Man]

I figure it had to be more than a simple botched burglary for Nixon to resign over.

REPORT: CIA Infiltrated Watergate Break-in as Nixon Threatened to Leak CIA Involvement in JFK Murder | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

The CIA was a step ahead of Richard Nixon. Nixon was aware of the CIA’s involvement in the JFK assassination but he might not have known that the CIA was involved in the Watergate break-in.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[BlindBoo]

Rodger Stone?

hahahahahahahaha OMFG hahahahahaha

 

[Quasar44]

I figure it had to be more than a simple botched burglary for Nixon to resign over.

REPORT: CIA Infiltrated Watergate Break-in as Nixon Threatened to Leak CIA Involvement in JFK Murder | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

The CIA was a step ahead of Richard Nixon. Nixon was aware of the CIA’s involvement in the JFK assassination but he might not have known that the CIA was involved in the Watergate break-in.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Is this true ??

 

[Soupnazi630]

Is this true ??

No

 

[fncceo]

I'll tell you what is wrong with that theory.

If Nixon really had been railroaded by The CIA, he would have lost nothing by dropping a dime on them.

Now, if Nixon had gone to prison and "hanged himself" in his cell, you might be on to something.

 

[Soupnazi630]

I figure it had to be more than a simple botched burglary for Nixon to resign over.

REPORT: CIA Infiltrated Watergate Break-in as Nixon Threatened to Leak CIA Involvement in JFK Murder | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

The CIA was a step ahead of Richard Nixon. Nixon was aware of the CIA’s involvement in the JFK assassination but he might not have known that the CIA was involved in the Watergate break-in.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Not one document or recording to back this story up

Just the word of a loudmouth who has no credibility

 

[wamose]

Interesting theory.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

Is this true ??

Everything I post is the truth.

 

[Billiejeens]

Not even a little surprised.

 

[BlindBoo]

Everything I post is the truth.

You're a legend in your own mind.

 

[Skylar]

Rodger Stone?

hahahahahahahaha OMFG hahahahahaha

View attachment 747025

The same literal cuck who insisted that the North Koreans smuggled fake ballots into the US via submarine through MAINE in 2020?

That Roger Stone?

 

[Oddball]

Is this true ??

yes

 

[Oddball]

What's tragicomically pathetic about all this is how the left, who distrusted and despised the spook state for as long as I can remember, now can't jam their heads far enough up its ass.

 

[skye]

Not even a little surprised.

Not me either.

 

[Oddball]

I'll tell you what is wrong with that theory.

If Nixon really had been railroaded by The CIA, he would have lost nothing by dropping a dime on them.

Now, if Nixon had gone to prison and "hanged himself" in his cell, you might be on to something.

You think that the spook state would have flinched for a moment going after his family?

 

[Skylar]

What's tragicomically pathetic about all this is how the left, who distrusted and despised the spook state for as long as I can remember, now can't jam their heads far enough up its ass.

I'm convinced by evidence. Do you have any? Or is this more of the same 'the North Koreans smuggled fake ballots into the US via Maine' gibbering nonsense backed by nothing.

 

[basquebromance]

“I ordered that they use any means necessary, including illegal means . . .”
President Richard Nixon to Chief of Staff Alexander Haig, 5-23-73

 

[Oddball]

I'm convinced by evidence. Do you have any? Or is this more of the same 'the North Koreans smuggled fake ballots into the US via Maine' gibbering nonsense backed by nothing.

All the evidence I need is right here....You crackpots can't run fast enough to defend the most secretive and openly corrupt band of spooks since the Stasi.

Congrats.....You moonbats are now everfything that you claimed to despise a mere few decades ago.

 

[basquebromance]

Almost forty years after the Watergate arrests on June 17, 1972, three myths about it are still pervasive. First, that the scandal only concerned “a third-rate burglary” of the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), at the Watergate complex in Washington, D.C. Second, that the “cover-up was worse than the crime.” And finally, that two reporters—Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein of The Washington Post—“brought down” President Richard M. Nixon.

Not one of these is true.

The three myths of Watergate have been demonstrably false for decades. President Nixon had his spokesman minimize the scandal’s importance by calling it “a third-rate burglary,” and Nixon was initially successful: Watergate was not a factor in—or even widely reported during—the fall 1972 Presidential campaign between President Nixon and Democratic candidate George McGovern. Richard Nixon was reelected in a landslide.


What’s wrong with the “third-rate burglary” claim? To begin with, even the singular term “burglary” is misleading, since Congressional and Justice Department investigations showed that four burglaries were actually attempted at the Watergate. Additionally, in the weeks before the final Watergate break-in, Nixon’s Watergate operatives committed several other burglaries. Their targets ranged from Democratic offices (including those of McGovern, Gary Hart, and Sargent Shriver) to journalists to the Chilean embassy in Washington.


Was the “the cover-up” worse than “the crime?” No—that’s another completely inaccurate myth, since Nixon’s own words prove that there wasn’t just one “crime.” From February 1971 to July 1973, Nixon secretly recorded his conversations at the Oval Office, and his other offices away from the White House. Only a handful of his closest aides knew about the taping system, and Nixon never intended for the tapes to become public. On those tapes, many released only in recent years, Nixon discussed many dozens of serious felonies, ranging from illegal political espionage (surveillance, bugging, wiretaps, beatings) to massive corporate bribes and illegal slush funds. In the early 1970s, evidence of Nixon’s clear culpability for those crimes was known only to a few dozen officials and investigators at the Justice Department and in Congress. With that proof now more widely available, it clearly shows the pervasive criminal culture of Nixon’s White House.


Finally, it’s true that The Washington Post played a leading role in reporting the crimes that led Nixon to resign rather than face impeachment. However, for decades Bob Woodward, Carl Bernstein, and The Post have been trying to point out that their reporting was not what “brought down” Nixon. Instead, it was the huge range of proven felonies that Richard Nixon and his men committed that resulted in Nixon’s resignation, and the convictions of more than thirty of his officials and associates.


Yet these three basic myths have kept the public and most journalists from looking at the tremendous amount of important new information about Nixon and Watergate that has emerged in recent years.


While Richard Nixon’s culpability for the Watergate break-ins has long been established, most recently by PBS in 2003, what’s truly remarkable is that after almost forty years, conventional accounts of the scandal still don’t address Nixon’s motive. Why was President Nixon willing to risk his reelection with so many repeated burglaries at the Watergate, and at other Washington offices, in just a few weeks? What motivated Nixon to jeopardize his Presidency by ordering the wide range of criminal operations that resulted in Watergate? What was Nixon so desperate to get at the Watergate, and how does it explain the deeper context surrounding his crimes?


What were the Watergate burglars after? And why was Nixon willing to risk his Presidency to get it?

Many people think the Watergate burglars broke in just to bug the DNC, yet why were the burglars caught with enough film to take photos of over fourteen hundred pages of documents? Why were all of the Watergate burglars current or former CIA agents? And why were most of those agents Cuban exiles, veterans of the CIA’s anti-Castro operations of the early 1960s?

 

[Oddball]

Finally, it’s true that The Washington Post played a leading role in reporting the crimes that led Nixon to resign rather than face impeachment. However, for decades Bob Woodward, Carl Bernstein, and The Post have been trying to point out that their reporting was not what “brought down” Nixon. Instead, it was the huge range of proven felonies that Richard Nixon and his men committed that resulted in Nixon’s resignation, and the convictions of more than thirty of his officials and associates.

Woodward was/still is a spook.