Rep. Peter King: ‘IRA terror supporter to judge Muslims’

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Rehmat, Feb 26, 2011.

  1. Rehmat
    Offline

    Rehmat Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    29
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +3
    “I am willing to be called a bigot if that’s what takes to target Muslim community,” Rep. Peter King, Think Progress, December 20, 2010.

    Congressman Peter King (R-NY), chairman the House Homeland Security committee is pushing Zionist Lobby agenda. He has announced to conduct a hearing to investigate that Al-Qaeda is recruiting members among the American Muslim community, which happens to be US’s largest religious community (over eight millions) and that the Muslims are not patriotic citizen.

    For a moment I thought that Peter King must believe that the ‘five dancing Israeli’ arrested on September 11, 2001 including Eric Harris, Dylan Klebold, Kip Kinkel, Chris Morris, Jonathan Pollard, Ben-Ami Kadish (arrested and charged with giving top secret nuclear information and details about the US Patriot Missile to an Israeli agent), convicted Larry Franklin (AIPAC member), Douglas Feith, Henry Kissinger, Jared Lee Loughner who shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) and the recently arrested Jewish Taliban, Oded Orbach, were all Muslims.

    Keith Ellison is first and only Muslim Congressman and he is an Afro-American covert. He doesn’t hold dual citizenship while there hundreds of American Jews at high government and other sensitive agencies (Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz and many others), who hold US-Israel dual citizenship. There is not a single Muslim in high office who holds citizenship other than the US. So who are patriotic, Jews or Muslims?

    According to Tom Parker, Amnesty Internalional Policy Director for Terrorism, Counterterrorism and Human Rights: “Peter King was a high profile supporter of the Provisional IRA for almost twenty years … This is a guy who is happy to bully other people when he has a whole crowd of skeletons in his closet on this issue.”

    Peter King forged links with leaders of the IRA and Sinn Fein in Ireland, and in America he hooked up with Irish Northern Aid, known as Noraid, a New York based group that the American, British, and Irish governments often accused of funneling guns and money to the IRA. At a time when the IRA’s murder of Lord Mountbatten and its fierce bombing campaign in Britain and Ireland persuaded most American politicians to shun IRA-support groups, King displayed no such inhibitions. He spoke regularly at Noraid protests and became close to the group’s publicity director, the Bronx lawyer Martin Galvin, a figure reviled by the British. Peter King only distant himself from Europe’s most horrible terrorist group not because he converted to Buddhism but due to vocal criticism of American invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq in Ireland.

    Last year Peter King had claimed that 85% of mosques in this country have extremist leaders and that Muslims in this country were reluctant to help law enforcement. During the Zionists’ jerk-reaction to the proposed Islamic Center near Ground Zero – Peter King said on CNN: “For instance, even this Imam (Feisal Abdul Rauf) himself who wants to construct the mosque at ground zero, he says that the United States was an accessory to 9/11. He refuses to denounce Hamas as a terrorist organization (that’s King’s real problem).”

    Here is an example to show the US lawmakers who work for the interests of a foreign government (Israel) than America’s national interests. On January 25, 1995 New York Senator Alfonse D’Amato, who represented a large Jewish constituency strongly supportive of Israel and had a long history of advocating tougher trade policies towards Iran, introduced in the Senate the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions Act (Cisa), intended to sever all trade links between the United States and Iran. In support of Israel-Firster D’Amato, Rep. Peter King on February 23, 1995 introduced identical legislation in the House. In a rush to head off the D’Amato and King bills, the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) announced on March 6, 1995 that it had signed a $1 billion contract with the US oil company Conoco to develop the offshore Sirri-A and Sirri-E gas fields. Though, both bills were described by US industry as “an example of an irresponsible commitment to unilateral controls in a world with declining multilateral co-ordination of trade restrictions” – the Jewish Lobby prevailed. On March 15, 1995, Predident Bill Clinton announced to issue an executive order prohibiting contracts similar to that between Conoco and NIOC. Conoco subsequently withdrew from the deal, while stressing that both the Bush and Clinton administrations had periodically been advised of its three years of negotiations on the Sirri fields. The Conoco was the first oil concession granted by Tehran since 1979 Islamic Revolution and came after 16 years of Washington’s anti-Iran campaign to please the pro-Israel Jewish lobbing groups.

    Rep. Peter King: ‘IRA terror supporter to judge Muslims’ | Rehmat's World
     

Share This Page