And do you want that decision resting in the hands of those who stand to make a handsome profit in refusing to provide what you pay for.HC ratioing is in all our futures.
Doesn't matter what party is in the oval office, rationig is already happening and that trend is likely to increase.
As our ability to keep dyig people alive longer, these decisions are going to have to be made.
the ONLY real debate here is WHO GETS TO DECIDE.
If you want things to remain the same, you want the INSURANCE COMPANIES to decide.
If you want some kind of government HC system, you want to give that decision to the government.
There is NO limit to the demand to keep us going and alive, folks.
But there is a limit to the resources we ca devote to people's HC.
That isn't really all that difficult to understand is it?
What?!
How you arrived at that conclusion I surely do not know.
If I tell you that it's likely to rain today, do you intepret that as:
Editec WANTS it to rain, today?
No?
Well that's exactly what you just did in assuming you KNOW something about me that I clearly did NOT say, hon.
Health care rationing is already happening, and as our population grows older, and our economy grows poorer, it sems apparent to me that still more obvious rationing is in ALL our futures, REGARDLESS of who is callig the shots.