Reid: George Bush Has No Credibility on National Security

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Stephanie, Sep 29, 2006.

  1. Stephanie
    Offline

    Stephanie Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2004
    Messages:
    70,236
    Thanks Received:
    10,818
    Trophy Points:
    2,040
    Ratings:
    +27,361
    9/28/2006 5:07:00 PM
    How can you take this man and this party serious?? He went on national TV and said....We Killed The Patriot Act...:duh3:

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To: National Desk

    Contact: Jim Manley or Rebecca Kirszner, 202-224-2939, both for Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid

    WASHINGTON, Sept. 28 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid issued the following statement on comments today by President Bush. A fact sheet on President Bush's failed Iraq strategy is below.

    "If George Bush is so confident that his national security policies are working, he should release the entire National Intelligence Estimate on terrorism and let the American people decide for themselves. The fact that he won't speaks volumes about how the failure of his policies has made the American people less safe.
    "George Bush has no credibility left on national security. No matter how many stump speeches he gives on the campaign trail, the American people can see the damage his tough talk has done to America's safety. It's time to be tough and smart so we can change course and give Americans the real security they deserve."

    ------

    Bush Is Alone In Clinging to a Failed Iraq Strategy

    DEMOCRATS' NATIONAL SECURITY PLAN WOULD MAKE AMERICA MORE SECURE

    Democrats' Real Security Act of 2006 Offers Vision for Changing Course from Bush's Failed Iraq Policies. The Real Security Act would:

    -- Change course to a strategy for success in Iraq and refocus our resources on destroying Al Qaeda and tracking, hunting and killing terrorists like Osama bin Laden.

    -- Increase the size of the military, double the Special Forces and properly fund equipment.What do you all think they mean by this???
    Bring back the draft????


    -- Screen 100 percent of containers and cargo bound for the U.S. in ships or airplanes at the point of origin and safeguard America's nuclear and chemical plants, and food and water supplies.

    -- By 2010, secure loose nuclear materials that terrorists could use to build nuclear weapons or "dirty bombs."

    -- Implement all the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission.

    EXPERTS ARE REJECTING BUSH REPUBLICAN NATIONAL SECURITY POLICIES AS FAILURES

    A Congressional Analysis Tallies the Cost of Bush's Failed Policies. U.S Taxpayers Pay $2 Billion per Week. "A new congressional analysis shows the Iraq war is now costing taxpayers almost $2 billion a week -- nearly twice as much as in the first year of the conflict three years ago and 20 percent more than last year -- as the Pentagon spends more on establishing regional bases to support the extended deployment and scrambles to fix or replace equipment damaged in combat." (Boston Globe, 9/28/06)

    The Intelligence Community Rejects Bush's Failed Iraq Policy. N.I.E. Concludes Iraq is the "Cause Celebre" for Jihadists. "The Iraq conflict has become the 'cause celebre' for jihadists, breeding a deep resentment of US involvement in the Muslim world and cultivating supporters for the global jihadist movement." (National Intelligence Estimate, 4/2006)

    Military Experts Reject Bush's Failed Iraq Policy. Major General John Batiste Says the U.S. Is Less Safe Now than It Was on 9/11. Batiste: "I believe that Rumsfeld and others in the administration did not tell the American people the truth for fear of losing support for the war in Iraq. Rumsfeld failed to address the full range of requirements for this effort and the result is one percent of the population shouldering the burdens, continued hemorrhaging of our national treasure in terms of blood and dollars, an Army and Marine Corps which will require tens of billions of dollars to reset after we withdraw from Iraq, the majority of our National Guard brigades no longer combat ready, a Veterans Administration which is under funded by over $3 billion, and America arguably less safe now than it was on 9/11. If we had seriously laid out and considered the full range of requirements for the war in Iraq, we would likely have taken a different course of action which would have maintained a clear focus on our main effort in Afghanistan, not fueled Islamic fundamentalism across the globe, and not created more enemies than there were insurgents." (Democratic Policy Committee Testimony, 9/25/06)

    Anonymous Republicans Reject Bush's Failed Iraq Policy. When granted anonymity, Republican Congressman Calls Bush's Iraq policy the "Just Stay and Let American Kids Die" Strategy. "Yesterday, I was one of a small group of reporters who ate lunch with a Republican congressman. He was thoughtful and blunt about the problems that face his party in the coming election—which is why I can't name him. He has criticized the conduct of the war in Iraq in public and to the president in private. He believes that if there is not a change in strategy soon, Americans will not support a war strategy that he characterized as "just stay and let American kids die." This member says many of his GOP colleagues have a similar view and privately articulate sharp criticisms and suggestions for new action. But they're not going to say anything in public now. Why? They don't want to hurt the Gop election chances by appearing to criticize the president. "Reality has been suspended for a moment," says the member. "Republicans cannot speak out publicly on this issue right now." (Slate, 9/21/06)

    Iraqis Resent Bush's Failed Iraq Policy. Disturbingly, Iraqis Approve of Attacks on U.S. Troops. "A majority of Iraqis -- 61 percent -- say they approve of attacks on U.S. forces and 71 percent want their government to ask U.S. troops to leave within a year, according to a University of Maryland poll." (Baltimore Sun, 9/27/06)

    http://www.usnewswire.com/
     
  2. musicman
    Offline

    musicman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2004
    Messages:
    5,171
    Thanks Received:
    533
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ratings:
    +533
    Isn't a Democrat saying that George Bush has no credibility on national security kind of like Ted Bundy criticizing someone else's lack of impulse control?
     
  3. CSM
    Offline

    CSM Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2004
    Messages:
    6,907
    Thanks Received:
    708
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Northeast US
    Ratings:
    +708
    The big problem for the Dems is their "plan" is not a plan at all. It is a bunch of rhetoric with no substance. I have read this thing over and over....I see no step by step process or procedure, no objective or end goals, no schedule...nothing that indicates they have a real plan.


    Anyone who advocates the release of the entire national intel estimate is off his rocker. If we are going to do that sort of thing we might as well not have ANY intel assets, organizations or resources what so ever. Spend the money we use currently on such things to build a national mosque... get a leg up on the construction you'll need to do when the bad guys win.
     
  4. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,576
    Thanks Received:
    8,171
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,220
    What national security plan???
     

Share This Page