Recent Arab investments in the U.S. and Canada

Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by ScreamingEagle, Feb 23, 2006.

  1. ScreamingEagle
    Offline

    ScreamingEagle Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Messages:
    12,887
    Thanks Received:
    1,610
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,159
    Are these investments also a threat to American security?

     
  2. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    So for all of the reasons cited above, what?
     
  3. Hobbit
    Offline

    Hobbit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2004
    Messages:
    5,099
    Thanks Received:
    420
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Near Atlanta, GA
    Ratings:
    +421
    Most of these are minority shareholder situations, not total buyouts. And most of them don't have anything to do with having a good measure of control over the most likely point of entry for a nuke into this country.
     
  4. Fmr jarhead
    Offline

    Fmr jarhead Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,119
    Thanks Received:
    103
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    SoFLA
    Ratings:
    +103
    Do you have on your tinfoil hat?
     
  5. ScreamingEagle
    Offline

    ScreamingEagle Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Messages:
    12,887
    Thanks Received:
    1,610
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,159
    In other words, you think we only need to be concerned about majority shareholders from the Middle East? Haha...like that is what it takes for terrorists to get a bomb into our country. :rolleyes:

    Do you really think ANY terminal owners truly know what is being shipped through their terminals? All they really know is what is declared on the manifests they get from the shippers, other than some spot checks. A declaration on a manifest can be a lie. Terrorists could pack up nuclear bomb parts into crates at some unsuspecting company somewhere in Britain (or any country) and load them into a container with hundreds of other crates. The container is then sealed, loaded onto a truck to be taken to an outbound shipping terminal, where it's hoisted off the truck and loaded onto a container ship to the U.S. In the U.S. the container is unloaded from the ship, placed onto a rig and then trucked to its final destination (still unsealed). On the manifest, they can just declare the contents as machinery or whatever. The container could sit in dock in either the originating port or the destination port for a while, among stacks and stacks of other containers, where it might get checked or it might not. If it is not physically checked, who's to know what's really in any container? Right now I understand we are only physically checking about 5%. What we really need are better security checks. That responsibility falls on the shoulders of our national security forces - and they are NOT under the authority of any foreign terminal owners.

    There are many other ways our security could be compromised through the port system. Here is an article that discusses some more of those issues. The best way to attain security (other than a peaceful world) will be to develop a comprehensive system to check every container including a scan of the contents of each one. http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/na...y23feb23,0,4613151.story?coll=bal-news-nation
     
  6. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    Bingo-
    I'm personally pleased that so many Americans are so concerned about national security. Now if they could focus on some security issues that would actually make a difference !
     

Share This Page