Reagan says Obama = Four More Years of Failure?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Nova78, Sep 17, 2012.

  1. Nova78
    Offline

    Nova78 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,915
    Thanks Received:
    254
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    Colorado
    Ratings:
    +267
    It's not Obama vs. Romney in 2012.

    It's really Obama vs. Obama.

    The president has to run against himself. His own record on the economy has been so pitiful he can't defend it or run on it. He has to run away from it.

    Instead of comparing his performance as president to what Romney-Ryan might do, Obama has to pretend like it's been someone else who's been mismanaging the economic recovery for the last 3 1/2 years.

    He has to pretend that it's not his policies that have kept unemployment above 8 percent for 43 straight months and racked up too many trillions of new debt to count.

    And this week, when the incompetent-in-chief was asked to give himself a grade for his own performance, his answer was not an "F" or "F-minus." It was "incomplete."

    President Obama said he needed more time. For what?

    To hope that Obamanomics can work, if we just wait until the USA becomes Greece or California?

    To prove that obscene deficits, wasteful government spending, overregulation and higher taxes on the successful can put the greatest economy in the history of the world in a coma for another four years?

    Compare what Obama is doing in this election to what Ronald Reagan did when he ran for re-election in 1984 against Walter Mondale.

    My father didn't have to hide from his own record, he ran on it. Proudly. Unlike Obama, he was able to show that his economic policies had pulled the wrecked Jimmy Carter economy out of the ditch and turned it around.

    Ronald Reagan could point to real progress -- real hope and change. He had cut the unemployment rate from double digits to 7.2 percent, adding almost 8 million jobs. The inflation rate had dropped from 10.3 percent to 3.3 percent. Interest rates were on their way down from 20 percent. Gasoline prices were not going up, but down.

    By 1983, the country was already clearly headed down the road to recovery, fueled by lower tax rates, simpler tax codes, less regulation and tighter monetary policy.

    Reaganomics -- which got government out of the way of the private sector -- was working. The severe recession of '82 — when unemployment hit 10.8 percent, still the highest since the Great Depression, was shrinking in the rear-view mirror.

    When my father's re-election campaign ran that famous optimistic ad that said, "It's morning again in America," people believed it. It was already coming true. That's why he was re-elected in a landslide.

    After 44 months in office, Obama is still trying to blame George W. Bush for the problems he inherited and hasn't been able to solve.

    My father didn't spend his first three years whining about the mess Jimmy Carter left him. He rolled up his sleeves and went to work. He didn't roll up his sleeves and put on a golf glove or practice his bowling skills.

    Being president of the United States in a time of economic crisis means you don't get to play golf more than 100 times. Being president means you have to go to work to fix the economy, not destroy it further.

    Obama is a true disaster -- a failure, a flop. Saying his grade is "incomplete" implies that he's got a good plan for the economy, but that he just needs four more years to put the finishing touches on it.

    He doesn't. He has no plan but the same old economic plan -- the one that hasn't worked and never will.

    About sums up it all up.....:eusa_clap::eusa_clap::eusa_clap:
     
  2. bodecea
    Offline

    bodecea Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2009
    Messages:
    89,168
    Thanks Received:
    10,382
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    #HasNoClothes
    Ratings:
    +23,692
    I like how you are not giving a link or credit.
     
  3. Sallow
    Offline

    Sallow The Big Bad Wolf. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    56,535
    Thanks Received:
    6,132
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    New York City
    Ratings:
    +7,394
    He "went to work" alrighty. In addition to the damage he did..which you pointed out..deregulation and tax cuts for the rich.

    He started spending LIKE CRAZY.

    This all came to a head..when..guess what? We had to bail out the financial sector. And Reagan authored one of the largest tax INCREASES during his second term.
     
  4. Lakhota
    Offline

    Lakhota Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    47,762
    Thanks Received:
    4,715
    Trophy Points:
    1,855
    Location:
    Native America
    Ratings:
    +16,055
    The "real" Obama has to run against the "fictional" Obama conjured up by lying NaziCons.
     
  5. Sallow
    Offline

    Sallow The Big Bad Wolf. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    56,535
    Thanks Received:
    6,132
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    New York City
    Ratings:
    +7,394
    They aren't Nazis.
     
  6. FJO
    Offline

    FJO Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2012
    Messages:
    7,255
    Thanks Received:
    936
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Just North of the 49th
    Ratings:
    +2,616
    I can't help feeling that the first post on this thread is the personal opinion of Nova78.

    It reads as though it was written by Ron Reagan, the frequent guest on MSNBC (Mud Slinging Nattering Bloviating Creeps), who would be voted No1. for most likely commit fratricide if his father was not already dead.

    There is no chance back-stabber Ron Reagan would ever defend Ronald Reagan.

    However, Ronald Reagan`s REAL son, Michael, would.

    Michael is the CHOSEN son, the REAL son, Ron is the curse, the damned and ungrateful piece of crap that the late great President had no choice about.
     
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2012
  7. Liberal
    Offline

    Liberal Libruhl! Libruhl!

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,250
    Thanks Received:
    181
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +182
    Funny, it seems as though the Romney campaign is changing it's message.. Because they have realized that JUST talking about the economy is not working.

    So if the "Obama" economy is so bad, and most people are exposed to it in some way.. Why is the message not resounding with most of Americans? Why is the Romney campaign, just now, after a year plus deciding to change directions in their rhetoric?
     
  8. Neotrotsky
    Offline

    Neotrotsky Council to Supreme Soviet

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    10,402
    Thanks Received:
    1,255
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    People's Republic
    Ratings:
    +2,350
    and four more years of speeches
    where we have to listen to "I" and "me"
     
  9. Mr. Shaman
    Offline

    Mr. Shaman Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Messages:
    23,892
    Thanks Received:
    817
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +819
    [​IMG]

    Yer' drawin' flies.....
     
  10. rdean
    Offline

    rdean rddean

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2009
    Messages:
    60,190
    Thanks Received:
    6,903
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    chicago
    Ratings:
    +15,022
    [​IMG]

    Facts are facts.
     

Share This Page