Un-Biased USSC? Sotomayor 'Racially Charged' Dissent Read Like A 'Black Lives Manifesto'
U.S. Supreme Court rules 5-3 in Utah drug search case
U.S. Supreme Court rules 5-3 in Utah drug search case
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Ok. Explain why Easy and bucs are wrong. (Hint. Calling them racists is not explaining.)Un-Biased USSC? Sotomayor 'Racially Charged' Dissent Read Like A 'Black Lives Manifesto'
U.S. Supreme Court rules 5-3 in Utah drug search case
They equate Sontomayor's dissent as black lives matter.Ok. Explain why Easy and bucs are wrong. (Hint. Calling them racists is not explaining.)Un-Biased USSC? Sotomayor 'Racially Charged' Dissent Read Like A 'Black Lives Manifesto'
U.S. Supreme Court rules 5-3 in Utah drug search case
Wow. That's almost as comprehensive of an answer as calling them racists!They equate Sontomayor's dissent as black lives matter.Ok. Explain why Easy and bucs are wrong. (Hint. Calling them racists is not explaining.)Un-Biased USSC? Sotomayor 'Racially Charged' Dissent Read Like A 'Black Lives Manifesto'
U.S. Supreme Court rules 5-3 in Utah drug search case
gee, I'm sure sorry noting people who go with black lives matter to diss Sontomayor's dissent in a case with a white defendant is too tough for you.Wow. That's almost as comprehensive of an answer as calling them racists!They equate Sontomayor's dissent as black lives matter.Ok. Explain why Easy and bucs are wrong. (Hint. Calling them racists is not explaining.)Un-Biased USSC? Sotomayor 'Racially Charged' Dissent Read Like A 'Black Lives Manifesto'
U.S. Supreme Court rules 5-3 in Utah drug search case
Aw. All you have are accusations. You can't even explain your own bias, how could you be expected to explain what you see in others. Sorry, when I asked you to articulate your point, I see I gave you credit for more than you are willing to be.gee, I'm sure sorry noting people who go with black lives matter to diss Sontomayor's dissent in a case with a white defendant is too tough for you.Wow. That's almost as comprehensive of an answer as calling them racists!They equate Sontomayor's dissent as black lives matter.Ok. Explain why Easy and bucs are wrong. (Hint. Calling them racists is not explaining.)Un-Biased USSC? Sotomayor 'Racially Charged' Dissent Read Like A 'Black Lives Manifesto'
U.S. Supreme Court rules 5-3 in Utah drug search case
She does mention race in a dissent that has no business doing so. A white defendant is stopped and she uses that to mention how blacks are commonly stopped and probed for no reason.Un-Biased USSC? Sotomayor 'Racially Charged' Dissent Read Like A 'Black Lives Manifesto'
U.S. Supreme Court rules 5-3 in Utah drug search case
Aw. All you have are accusations. You can't even explain your own bias, how could you be expected to explain what you see in others.gee, I'm sure sorry noting people who go with black lives matter to diss Sontomayor's dissent in a case with a white defendant is too tough for you.Wow. That's almost as comprehensive of an answer as calling them racists!They equate Sontomayor's dissent as black lives matter.Ok. Explain why Easy and bucs are wrong. (Hint. Calling them racists is not explaining.)Un-Biased USSC? Sotomayor 'Racially Charged' Dissent Read Like A 'Black Lives Manifesto'
U.S. Supreme Court rules 5-3 in Utah drug search case
And just what are you looking deeply into? Certainly nothing to edify the topic of discussion.Aw. All you have are accusations. You can't even explain your own bias, how could you be expected to explain what you see in others.gee, I'm sure sorry noting people who go with black lives matter to diss Sontomayor's dissent in a case with a white defendant is too tough for you.Wow. That's almost as comprehensive of an answer as calling them racists!They equate Sontomayor's dissent as black lives matter.Ok. Explain why Easy and bucs are wrong. (Hint. Calling them racists is not explaining.)
Did you just try to make this about HIS bias? Then claim all he has is accusations AFTER accusing him or not seeing his own bias? This is high level stuff. Do you have anything to add on the topic or do you want to finish staring deeply into the OP's eyes?
And just what are you looking deeply into? Certainly nothing to edify the topic of discussion.Aw. All you have are accusations. You can't even explain your own bias, how could you be expected to explain what you see in others.gee, I'm sure sorry noting people who go with black lives matter to diss Sontomayor's dissent in a case with a white defendant is too tough for you.Wow. That's almost as comprehensive of an answer as calling them racists!They equate Sontomayor's dissent as black lives matter.
Did you just try to make this about HIS bias? Then claim all he has is accusations AFTER accusing him or not seeing his own bias? This is high level stuff. Do you have anything to add on the topic or do you want to finish staring deeply into the OP's eyes?
Uh huh. Thanks for keeping the thread on focus, clownboy.And just what are you looking deeply into? Certainly nothing to edify the topic of discussion.Aw. All you have are accusations. You can't even explain your own bias, how could you be expected to explain what you see in others.gee, I'm sure sorry noting people who go with black lives matter to diss Sontomayor's dissent in a case with a white defendant is too tough for you.Wow. That's almost as comprehensive of an answer as calling them racists!
Did you just try to make this about HIS bias? Then claim all he has is accusations AFTER accusing him or not seeing his own bias? This is high level stuff. Do you have anything to add on the topic or do you want to finish staring deeply into the OP's eyes?
So you dont have a point you're just here to stare at people. Stay committed man