The Professor
Diamond Member
- Mar 4, 2011
- 16,752
- 25,010
- 2,405
I'm really quite shocked how many people here are saying she did barely anything, if anything, wrong.
She was WAAAAYY too trigger happy. He was unarmed and thus she had no reason to shoot him. Had she taken even 30 seconds to figure out WTF was going on she could have realized she was in the wrong apartment and been like holy shit I'm sorry and life would go on. I mean how many intruders would sit down and eat ice cream while watching a football game if they were going to rob the place?
But instead she double tapped that nigah and is paying for it but not nearly long enough.
You said, “I'm really quite shocked how many people here are saying she did barely anything, if anything, wrong.” You are correct of course and to me that was the most disturbing thing of all. The funniest things were whose who thought they knew the law and were completely ignorant. I am a 79-year old man with an MBA and a JD (Juris Doctorate or doctorate in law) and could not believe how little people knew about the laws which govern them.
You also asked, “I mean how many intruders would sit down and eat ice cream while watching a football game if they were going to rob the place?” I would add, how many people, especially trained police officers would “accidentally”enter an apartment that had a big red mat in front of the door knowing their own apartment did not?
In a nut shell, Amber Guyger is a liar and is guilty as hell. Even before she was arrested, I predicted she would be convicted and I explained why. I'll be back in a few days to make my final comments on this case.
Last edited: