RightWingFerret
Rookie
- Banned
- #41
if I had a dog, my dog would of accomplished more than Obama during these 3.4 years.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IN all fairness...I do not see it as lazy or ignorant. Not everyone allows politics to play a mjaor role in their lives. I believe many people are trusting...they trust what they hear on the news. To them, if Brian Williams siad it, it must be true...and if Brian Williams doesnt report on it, then it never happened.
Me? Early in the mroning I watch local news affiliate of NBC.....mid day, I have CNN on in the backgorund. 6:00 Brett Baier on Fox. And when there is a conflict of information, (more often than not), I conduct my own research.
I NEVER read blogs.....ever.
But I am retired...I have the time.
wow you think Obama is moderate, and you're an independant....hmmmm something doesnt smell right. The only thing more leftwing he could do is just come out and say he's a socialist.
Are you sure you know what the definition of Socialism is? Until Obama comes out and says to the United States that he wants the government to take over all of the major industries and companies so the profits can be dictated and shared by all, Im going to go ahead and say that you dont know what youre talking about.
Stop trying to make Obama look more extreme than he is.
For the first time in the hiostory of our nation, a bill was written and signed into law that madates that a citizen MUST purchase or have someone purchase a product. For good or for bad, that was a first.
Then, 2 years later, the same President ammends a law and adds into it, for the first time in the history of our nation, that a company of a particular industry MUST offer a service (contraception), even if it prefers not to.
Please notice...these are both FIRST TIMES.....
For the first time, (and I bleieve against the law), the President approved the American Taxpayer being pushed back to a sewcond position...a subordinate position in lending terms...as it pertains to the Solyndra loan. That has never happened before...and as I said...I believe there is a law preventing this.....
Alkl three of the above concern me.
Is he a socilaist...I have no idea.
But I will say this...I do not like the trends I am seeing...and what concerns me more is what he will do when re-election isnt a concern of his.
if I had a dog, my dog would of accomplished more than Obama during these 3.4 years.
For the first time in the hiostory of our nation, a bill was written and signed into law that madates that a citizen MUST purchase or have someone purchase a product. For good or for bad, that was a first.
Is it really though? I have to purchase guns and fund troops so that they can invade Iraq and police the world, right? I have to pay into Medicare/Medicaid yet have never needed to use those services; arent I being forced into those too? And evidence hes a socialist not quite.
Then, 2 years later, the same President ammends a law and adds into it, for the first time in the history of our nation, that a company of a particular industry MUST offer a service (contraception), even if it prefers not to.
I think the law requires companies to offer contraception as part of their insurance coverage. All insurance companies will build contraception into a plan if asked to do so, so the forcing comes on the side of the company whos developing an insurance plan for its employees.
Do I agree with it, not really. Is it a big deal, no. Is it evidence hes a socialist, no.
Please notice...these are both FIRST TIMES.....
For the first time, (and I bleieve against the law), the President approved the American Taxpayer being pushed back to a sewcond position...a subordinate position in lending terms...as it pertains to the Solyndra loan. That has never happened before...and as I said...I believe there is a law preventing this.....
Not too familiar with this one. But socialist? Not quite evidence.
Alkl three of the above concern me.
Is he a socilaist...I have no idea.
But I will say this...I do not like the trends I am seeing...and what concerns me more is what he will do when re-election isnt a concern of his.
Has the President overstretched the reach of executive power? Yes, I think so. But not all of this is solely his fault, as I think we have the Bush Presidency to thank for a lot of post 9/11 special powers given to the executive branch of the United States government.
Socialist? Ive yet to see any real evidence that hes a socialist. He might be a wannabe dictator at time, but hes definitely not a socialist.
For the first time in the hiostory of our nation, a bill was written and signed into law that madates that a citizen MUST purchase or have someone purchase a product. For good or for bad, that was a first.
Is it really though? I have to purchase guns and fund troops so that they can invade Iraq and police the world, right? I have to pay into Medicare/Medicaid yet have never needed to use those services; arent I being forced into those too? And evidence hes a socialist not quite.
Then, 2 years later, the same President ammends a law and adds into it, for the first time in the history of our nation, that a company of a particular industry MUST offer a service (contraception), even if it prefers not to.
I think the law requires companies to offer contraception as part of their insurance coverage. All insurance companies will build contraception into a plan if asked to do so, so the forcing comes on the side of the company whos developing an insurance plan for its employees.
Do I agree with it, not really. Is it a big deal, no. Is it evidence hes a socialist, no.
Please notice...these are both FIRST TIMES.....
For the first time, (and I bleieve against the law), the President approved the American Taxpayer being pushed back to a sewcond position...a subordinate position in lending terms...as it pertains to the Solyndra loan. That has never happened before...and as I said...I believe there is a law preventing this.....
Not too familiar with this one. But socialist? Not quite evidence.
Alkl three of the above concern me.
Is he a socilaist...I have no idea.
But I will say this...I do not like the trends I am seeing...and what concerns me more is what he will do when re-election isnt a concern of his.
Has the President overstretched the reach of executive power? Yes, I think so. But not all of this is solely his fault, as I think we have the Bush Presidency to thank for a lot of post 9/11 special powers given to the executive branch of the United States government.
Socialist? Ive yet to see any real evidence that hes a socialist. He might be a wannabe dictator at time, but hes definitely not a socialist.
if I had a dog, my dog would of accomplished more than Obama during these 3.4 years.
Doesn't make any sense.
Let's say that Obama's only accomplishment was killing OBL (for the sake of the argument). How would you explain a dog being able to coordinate such an operation (or even say Yes or No) as Commander in Chief? I think its impossible.
wow you think Obama is moderate, and you're an independant....hmmmm something doesnt smell right. The only thing more leftwing he could do is just come out and say he's a socialist.
So what did Obama accomplish since he took office?
I would like to know, because honestly the only good thing I can see is that UBL was killed, but even that was not entirely Obama's credit.......
In my view since Obama took office we have become more divided, more nasty to each other, more people live in poverty, more people feeling "entitled"........
Just my two cents.....