Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am tempted to take your bait.
1) Part of the reason for the Dem victory in 06 was folks were getting real tired of Iraq. I felt bait and switched upon myself. Kerry would have had us out of there. Not with dignity, but you have to view the reality that empire is unhealthy for a democracy.
2) Kerry would have had a short recession and a slow glide downhill, with Kerry there would have been no huge bubble like the one that blew in the fall of 08. Therefore we wouldn't have had TARP, which was a Bush idea.
3) there seems to be an amazing anger at the republicans for failing to keep up with their promises from the Clinton years. Pelosi had moved congress backwards even faster, but the Republicans just blew off the goodwill they had by making reforms, and then going back on them. No one cares about the bad girl ways of Nancy. Tom DeLay annoyed folks.
Taurus rising, contents of Taurus over capacity and descending.I am tempted to take your bait.
1) Part of the reason for the Dem victory in 06 was folks were getting real tired of Iraq. I felt bait and switched upon myself. Kerry would have had us out of there. Not with dignity, but you have to view the reality that empire is unhealthy for a democracy.
2) Kerry would have had a short recession and a slow glide downhill, with Kerry there would have been no huge bubble like the one that blew in the fall of 08. Therefore we wouldn't have had TARP, which was a Bush idea.
3) there seems to be an amazing anger at the republicans for failing to keep up with their promises from the Clinton years. Pelosi had moved congress backwards even faster, but the Republicans just blew off the goodwill they had by making reforms, and then going back on them. No one cares about the bad girl ways of Nancy. Tom DeLay annoyed folks.
Thanks for sharing, Miss Cleo. I always enjoy these little "future prediction" shows. How about giving me my horoscope now?
Would we be better off if John Kerry had won in 2004? consider this: Barack Obama would NOT be president right now.
A leftist is a leftist is a leftist, so no. Starting down this road four years earlier wouldn't have been better. What would have been better is if the Republicans had run an actual conservative. Consider this: Barack Obama would NOT be President right now.
Indeed no. Things would have just gone south that much sooner.
Conservative in the american sense of the word would be one who favored smaller government. Please tell me how reatarded you have to be to think that Geore W. Bush or his daddy were in favor of smaller government?
It always kills me when Liberals point to the policies of Bush and say that they were a failure so we need to adopt Liberal approaches. Bush was a Liberal in terms of spending and increasing the size and power of the Federal Governmnet.
If this burner of money and expander of Federal government was doing a bad thing, why do we need to provide more money to burn and a bigger Federal government with which to burn it?
It didn't work when we spent way too much, so let's triple our efforts and spend way, way, way too much.
What's wrong with this picture?
Indeed no. Things would have just gone south that much sooner.
Conservative in the american sense of the word would be one who favored smaller government. Please tell me how reatarded you have to be to think that Geore W. Bush or his daddy were in favor of smaller government?
It always kills me when Liberals point to the policies of Bush and say that they were a failure so we need to adopt Liberal approaches. Bush was a Liberal in terms of spending and increasing the size and power of the Federal Governmnet.
If this burner of money and expander of Federal government was doing a bad thing, why do we need to provide more money to burn and a bigger Federal government with which to burn it?
It didn't work when we spent way too much, so let's triple our efforts and spend way, way, way too much.
What's wrong with this picture?
That's easy. Domestic priorities were largely underfunded or ignored. Just what DID BushCo. spend to create his deficit numbers? Even the spending in the aftermath of 911 eventually proved profitable for the private sector, and therefore the government by way of more taxes for the coffer, and the two wars were funded separately.
[/COLOR]
It always kills me when Liberals point to the policies of Bush and say that they were a failure so we need to adopt Liberal approaches. Bush was a Liberal in terms of spending and increasing the size and power of the Federal Governmnet.
If this burner of money and expander of Federal government was doing a bad thing, why do we need to provide more money to burn and a bigger Federal government with which to burn it?
It didn't work when we spent way too much, so let's triple our efforts and spend way, way, way too much.
What's wrong with this picture?
That's easy. Domestic priorities were largely underfunded or ignored. Just what DID BushCo. spend to create his deficit numbers? Even the spending in the aftermath of 911 eventually proved profitable for the private sector, and therefore the government by way of more taxes for the coffer, and the two wars were funded separately.
BushCo.
people still say that, huh?
That's easy. Domestic priorities were largely underfunded or ignored. Just what DID BushCo. spend to create his deficit numbers? Even the spending in the aftermath of 911 eventually proved profitable for the private sector, and therefore the government by way of more taxes for the coffer, and the two wars were funded separately.
BushCo.
people still say that, huh?
Sure. Why not? He and his minions will be table-talk for a loooooooong time to come. Feel free to inject Bill Clinton into the conversation anytime you like.
yes, besides, Iraq wasnt even close to being finished like it is now
are you saying that john kerry would make a worse president than Barack Obama?
John Kerry--the "I voted for it, before I voted against it guy"? I really don't expect Obama to make it into a second term--therefore, I think it a wash.
BushCo.
people still say that, huh?
Sure. Why not? He and his minions will be table-talk for a loooooooong time to come. Feel free to inject Bill Clinton into the conversation anytime you like.
no thanks. i live in the now.
you should try it.
BushCo, too funny.
Sure. Why not? He and his minions will be table-talk for a loooooooong time to come. Feel free to inject Bill Clinton into the conversation anytime you like.
no thanks. i live in the now.
you should try it.
BushCo, too funny.
So do I. And I would very much like to see Bush and company standing in the dock in the "now".
Would we be better off if John Kerry had won in 2004? consider this: Barack Obama would NOT be president right now.
BushCo.
people still say that, huh?
Sure. Why not? He and his minions will be table-talk for a loooooooong time to come. Feel free to inject Bill Clinton into the conversation anytime you like.
no thanks. i live in the now.
you should try it.
BushCo, too funny.
Indeed no. Things would have just gone south that much sooner.
Conservative in the american sense of the word would be one who favored smaller government. Please tell me how reatarded you have to be to think that Geore W. Bush or his daddy were in favor of smaller government?
It always kills me when Liberals point to the policies of Bush and say that they were a failure so we need to adopt Liberal approaches. Bush was a Liberal in terms of spending and increasing the size and power of the Federal Governmnet.
If this burner of money and expander of Federal government was doing a bad thing, why do we need to provide more money to burn and a bigger Federal government with which to burn it?
It didn't work when we spent way too much, so let's triple our efforts and spend way, way, way too much.
What's wrong with this picture?
That's easy. Domestic priorities were largely underfunded or ignored. Just what DID BushCo. spend to create his deficit numbers? Even the spending in the aftermath of 911 eventually proved profitable for the private sector, and therefore the government by way of more taxes for the coffer, and the two wars were funded separately.
none of them[/COLOR]
It always kills me when Liberals point to the policies of Bush and say that they were a failure so we need to adopt Liberal approaches. Bush was a Liberal in terms of spending and increasing the size and power of the Federal Governmnet.
If this burner of money and expander of Federal government was doing a bad thing, why do we need to provide more money to burn and a bigger Federal government with which to burn it?
It didn't work when we spent way too much, so let's triple our efforts and spend way, way, way too much.
What's wrong with this picture?
That's easy. Domestic priorities were largely underfunded or ignored. Just what DID BushCo. spend to create his deficit numbers? Even the spending in the aftermath of 911 eventually proved profitable for the private sector, and therefore the government by way of more taxes for the coffer, and the two wars were funded separately.
What programs showed a real actual dollar reduction?