HomeInspect
Senior Member
the American media polluting the American minds
Proving Media Bias - Political Science - Prager University
Proving Media Bias - Political Science - Prager University
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the American media polluting the American minds
Proving Media Bias - Political Science - Prager University
the American media polluting the American minds
Proving Media Bias - Political Science - Prager University
AS I expected.. none of the mindless who responded could refute the info provided. Gee.. wonder why?
Well for one, it doesn't matter who the reporters vote for, they are not the ones that pick what stories to write about. . Remember the chuckles Bush got at the radio and tv correspondents assn. dinner? He was yukking it up about not finding wmd's. What's the story here? Most of them are probably liberals but they don't want to risk their jobs walking out maybe? Here's a u tube clip. Watch it then tell me where the liberal media bias is. Now remember, this guy you depend on for your information said in the beginning of your clip, The most important thing first and foremost is that the reporters vote overwhelmingly democrat. How they vote and how they act at their business friendly corporate jobs are two different things.
Second, Van Jones. See how quickly he disappeared. The "M" word (marxist) and Obama. After Van Jones who else you got? Look at Obama appointments. Won't find any radicals, progressives, or Marxists. Not one.
Bush tax cuts another story but they sure didn't create any jobs under Bush. The measly two or three hundred I got was no big deal. The wealthy are fewer but received far greater amount individually. Anyway chomp on the 1st position I believe I refuted. The thing about Palin and Hillary. Filler stuff. He said she said. Notice how the liberal media doesn't worry about the BP oil spill anymore? Or how the Exxon Valdez plaintiffs had to wait over twenty years to get paid only a fraction of original settlement? Or what about the Koch Bros. convicted of stealing oil from government land and just had to pay a fine. Big list I could give you off the top of my head but come up with an answer about why the "liberal media" doesn't pursue stories of any importance..Just the mindless dribble that keeps people like yourself worried about Marxists.
Bush laughs at no WMD in Iraq - YouTube
AS I expected.. none of the mindless who responded could refute the info provided. Gee.. wonder why?
So the major media, which is corporate america, is going to have a bias toward liberals, the same ones who are supposedly anti business? I know this philosphy is taught at praeger and limbaugh university, so it must be right.
the American media polluting the American minds
Proving Media Bias - Political Science - Prager University
Well for one, it doesn't matter who the reporters vote for, they are not the ones that pick what stories to write about. . Remember the chuckles Bush got at the radio and tv correspondents assn. dinner? He was yukking it up about not finding wmd's. What's the story here? Most of them are probably liberals but they don't want to risk their jobs walking out maybe? Here's a u tube clip. Watch it then tell me where the liberal media bias is. Now remember, this guy you depend on for your information said in the beginning of your clip, The most important thing first and foremost is that the reporters vote overwhelmingly democrat. How they vote and how they act at their business friendly corporate jobs are two different things.
Second, Van Jones. See how quickly he disappeared. The "M" word (marxist) and Obama. After Van Jones who else you got? Look at Obama appointments. Won't find any radicals, progressives, or Marxists. Not one.
Bush tax cuts another story but they sure didn't create any jobs under Bush. The measly two or three hundred I got was no big deal. The wealthy are fewer but received far greater amount individually. Anyway chomp on the 1st position I believe I refuted. The thing about Palin and Hillary. Filler stuff. He said she said. Notice how the liberal media doesn't worry about the BP oil spill anymore? Or how the Exxon Valdez plaintiffs had to wait over twenty years to get paid only a fraction of original settlement? Or what about the Koch Bros. convicted of stealing oil from government land and just had to pay a fine. Big list I could give you off the top of my head but come up with an answer about why the "liberal media" doesn't pursue stories of any importance..Just the mindless dribble that keeps people like yourself worried about Marxists.
Bush laughs at no WMD in Iraq - YouTube
AS I expected.. none of the mindless who responded could refute the info provided. Gee.. wonder why?
You still don't refute the points of extreme media bias. For instance, Van Jones didn't disappear because of the main stream media.. where were they on this. Why did the MSM send scores of reporters to Wasilla Alaska to dig up stuff on Palin, when Obama was hardly vetted by the media?
Why was Sara picked on? I don't know. Maybe because she's news. A half wit, but gets press. Still, minor stuff compared to big stories that don't get play. The Kochs get felony charges on them for stealing gas on gov't land, and many other charges including wrongful death judgements in some of their industries, also bribing foreign officials. Pay a fine, nothing more. They can still influence elections with their money and fund thing tanks like americans for prosperity, freedom works, the list goes on. All republican by the way. This should be what's reported and is not because we do not have a liberal media.