Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Only way this goes south for the defense is if ANTIFA is in the gallery giving the jury menacing looks.The last thing the defense really wants is a mistrial. They have to ask. Or it's malpractice. But they don't want one.
The judge can actually do that with prejudice?The last thing the defense really wants is a mistrial. They have to ask. Or it's malpractice. But they don't want one.
Kyle invoked his 5th Amendment rights upon arrest, and the DA knowingly violated them retroactively. I'm a bit confuzzled on that point, I have watched that bit over and over. . . it's procedural, and it was NOT done in front of the jury. He has been warned. If he does it in front of the jury. . . . . ???The judge can actually do that with prejudice?
www.hitc.com
Is the DA that desperate or agenda-driven to actually use a defendant’s right to silence as evidence against them? Regardless of the outcome of this trial, this is going to be held against the DA for years to come. It may even be used in Law Schools for “don’t do that”.Kyle invoked his 5th Amendment rights upon arrest, and the DA knowingly violated them retroactively. I'm a bit confuzzled on that point, I have watched that bit over and over. . . it's procedural, and it was NOT done in front of the jury. He has been warned. If he does it in front of the jury. . . . . ???
What is a mistrial with prejudice? Meaning explained
What is the meaning of 'mistrial with prejudice' as Kyle Rittenhouse's attorney argue their client's rights were violated during the trial.
If that was a black man on trial he would of been hung up by now. But its a white sobbing child who was 17 at the time that caused the deaths of 2 men.
You are a feminist. This will end.If that was a black man on trial he would of been hung up by now. But its a white sobbing child who was 17 at the time that caused the deaths of 2 men.
If that was a black man on trial he would of been hung up by now. But its a white sobbing child who was 17 at the time that caused the deaths of 2 men.
He killed to blm guys and the right wants him beatified and given hero status.
I know the law and he shouldn't of been there with an AR 15, and he has no rights to have.It is like. . . either you folks haven't been watching the trial, or you honestly do not give a shit about the law and facts.
At this point, the only thing that matters anymore is politics, am I getting this right?
Hopefully you're right.True but it won't end good for him.
What amazes me is if he was s black and killed two people, some on here would want him gone by now. Oh the irony of what appears to be political racism.
He killed to blm guys and the right wants him beatified and given hero status.
He is going to jail.
True but it won't end good for him.
What amazes me is if he was s black and killed two people, some on here would want him gone by now. Oh the irony of what appears to be political racism.
He killed to blm guys and the right wants him beatified and given hero status.
He is going to jail.
There were dozens of blacks who murdered people during the BLM riots, including that thug looter who killed a retired police captain in cold blood. But no…..let’s go after a white teen who killed in self-defense.If that was a black man on trial he would of been hung up by now. But its a white sobbing child who was 17 at the time that caused the deaths of 2 men.
I usually agree with you, but not here. I DO think race has a lot to do with this. They are going after this kid with a vengeance, feeling he is fair game because he is white, and the left has vilified whites. If this involved a Black kid, it would be just another BLM street tussle and we’d never even know the killer’s name.Race has nothing to do with it and attempting to make it so is beyond lame
Well yes, a mistrial with prejudice would have the same effect as a directed verdict.The judge can actually do that with prejudice?
Yes, they have this case all but won, so having another trial would not be the outcome they would want.The last thing the defense really wants is a mistrial. They have to ask. Or it's malpractice. But they don't want one.
I'm not disagreeing with you on that.I know the law and he shouldn't of been there with an AR 15, and he has no rights to have.
Unfortunatley these blm thugs are getting away with their crimes.There were dozens of blacks who murdered people during the BLM riots, including that thug looter who killed a retired police captain in cold blood. But no…..let’s go after a white teen who killed in self-defense.
IOW, if this case involved a black man, we wouldn’t see a trial at all.
