Proposes amendment- your thoughts?

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by proletarian, Mar 3, 2010.

  1. ☭proletarian☭
    Online

    ☭proletarian☭ Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    The Second amendment to this Constitution is hereby amended to read:

    A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, and the rights to Life, Liberty, and Property being secure only when the People and persons possess the necessary means to protect them, the right of the People to keep arms and to maintain such militias as are necessary to insure liberty and keep distant the hands of tyranny shall not be infringed. The right of persons to keep and bear arms for the defense of the aforementioned rights shall not be infringed without due process of law.


    The first part is to protect the militias the Fed has already assumed control of (see state militias and the national guard)


    The second part is to protect the rights of the individual
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 3, 2010
  2. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,770
    Why are you posting political shit here? Did you miss the sticked thread. dweebus?

    AKA: go away?
     
  3. ☭proletarian☭
    Online

    ☭proletarian☭ Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    I see Gunny is opposed to protecting second amendment rights
     
  4. emilynghiem
    Offline

    emilynghiem Constitutionalist Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    15,503
    Thanks Received:
    1,866
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    National Freedmen's Town District
    Ratings:
    +4,251
    1. I would just recommend that anyone who wants to exercise the right to bear arms must take the same oath of office to uphold Constitutional laws as any other Official or Officer of the law, and go through the same training.

    2. Same with legal defenses -- the laws and due process should only be used to defend the law and never to infringe or obstruct justice or due process of others, as is happening now. Since legal representation is another form of defense, and the only alternative for those who don't use guns to defend their rights, then legal authority must also be reserved to uphold laws, and never abused to violate the equal protection of others. Right now both forms of defense are commonly abused.

    3. Lastly, anyone who abuses the law to obstruct justice or violate the protection of others should owe restitution, or in the case of capital crimes should lose their citizenship. Citizenship should require signing an agreement to respect the consent of others and equal respect for and protection of the laws, or else forfeit citizenship if weapons are abused to commit a premeditated crime. If restitution is owed to crime victims, they should have that option of instituting life in prison labor as an alternative to execution.

     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2010
  5. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,770
    I'm opposed to fuckwits that can't figure out the Dewey Decimal System.:eusa_eh:
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. ☭proletarian☭
    Online

    ☭proletarian☭ Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    Dewey System? No wonder I couldn't find anything. I was using the Congressional system and wondering why your shelves were so fucked up.


    Now are ya gonna tell your representatives to push for the amendment or not?
     
  7. 007
    Offline

    007 Charter Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    38,328
    Thanks Received:
    7,867
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +11,935
    My thoughts? My thoughts are you can't read worth a fuck, or are dumber'n a fucking brick.

    What part about don't post political shit in this section don't you understand jack off?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. ☭proletarian☭
    Online

    ☭proletarian☭ Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    Awesome!


    PR also stands against 2nd amendment rights.



    Not surprising.
     

Share This Page