How about you just explain how grants work if you actually think the researchers involved make a pretty penny off of them?I'm sorry. Do you actually not understand how grants work?Lol where is this evidence that climatologists are profiting off of this? You people keep saying this without proof. Just because it sounds like it could be true doesn't mean it actually is.What I find hilarious about you cons is that you have no problem cherry picking when it comes to climate change. You intentionally ignore the fact that the vast majority of PEER-REVIEWED studies from around the world say man made climate change is real and cherry pick a handful ofbscientists who dissent. Not only that , but you choose scientists who aren't even involved in the discipline of climatology. It's kind of embarrassing.
Maybe you should just admit that deep down you know this phenomenon to be true and it scares you.
Here is what I think about the peer reviewed studies. It all depends on the input. Garbage in, garbage out. The numbers are crunched by a very few and the rest of the community makes their judgement on those numbers. So if those numbers are in question then any review will be in agreement, it more or less has to be. So it is not surprising that scientist look at the numbers, temperature up, CO2 up, man makes CO2 up then obviously there is a tie, and there may well be.
But is it catastrophic? Gore has been saying for 20 years we only have 10 years to act. Gore's famous CO2 to temperature graph shows CO2 lagging temperature by about 400 years. Temperature turns and goes up and 400 years later CO2 concentration goes up. Yes, they have an explanation for that but it isn't simple and in my opinion it should be simple. Nuclear power can be explained relatively easily. I am not sure why climate change has to be so complicated.
Which brings us to the truth.
Not all scientists who disagree with GW hysteria are lying.
The money supposedly buying of those who disagree pales in the amount given to scientist who do agree.
A few degree change in temperature is a boom for mankind. I certainly have enjoyed this fall.
All it will take to turn this around is a major eruption, then we will be talking crop damage and ice age.
We have bigger fish to fry, like putting people to work, then we have in shutting down industry for a few degree rise in temperature.
The whole discussion is not about polluting, it is about CO2 and warming.
Finally, I and you, have heard it all before. In the 70s you damn well know they preached nothing but disaster for the human race. It was predicted we would be out of oil by the 90s and I just read that the storage capacity of the world is full. They predicted that genetically altered food would be the end of our food supply, yet here we are producing more food then ever. They predicted that the world could not sustain a population near what we see today. Scientist make their careers developing theories, that is what they do, but they don't always do it right or are right.
Enjoy the lower heating bills and walking in a tee shirt in November, it isn't going to last for long.
It's also so tiresome you bring up Al Gore. No one gives a shit what Al Gore says. I listen to the actual CONSENSUS of experts involved in the actual field.
OK, I will stop pointing out that colleges get grants. Grants pay professors. If you and the GW fear mongering side will quit with the big oil is buying off the opposition, at least quit saying it without proof.
I am sorry, do you think people will be fooled into thinking you do because you asked an asinine question?