Pro Life Pro Gun Democrat

Discussion in 'Election Forums' started by vasuderatorrent, Sep 11, 2019.

  1. Monk-Eye
    Offline

    Monk-Eye VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2018
    Messages:
    782
    Thanks Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings:
    +160
    " Certain That Nothing Is Guaranteed "

    * On Both Rails Of One Track *
    The citations are accurate for theories on the current definition of " natural law " as it relates to " natural rights ( sic ) " .

    * Subjective Differences For Design *
    My suppositions for attributes of individual liberty are self ownership ( free roam , free association , progeny ) and self determination ( private property , willful intents ) .

    Perspectivism cedes there to be multiple truths and that one truth may be more valid than an other truth .

    Given evidence of entropy and relativism within nature , to allege any complex system cannot be alienated must be a disingenuous effort to promote foolishness .
     
  2. Porter Rockwell
    Offline

    Porter Rockwell VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2018
    Messages:
    3,492
    Thanks Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Ratings:
    +1,209
    So you try to claim a monopoly on human virtue by babbling nonsense to make it appear there is some deep meaning behind your personal ideology? Save it. Let me simplify this for you:

    Beating heart = Life
     
  3. Terri4Trump
    Offline

    Terri4Trump Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2019
    Messages:
    5,164
    Thanks Received:
    1,090
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    California
    Ratings:
    +5,642
    They were all chased out of the party.
     
  4. Monk-Eye
    Offline

    Monk-Eye VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2018
    Messages:
    782
    Thanks Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings:
    +160
    " Reflections On Myopic Vanity Of Sanctimonious Hubris "

    * Egalitarian Democracy Verses Representative Republic *
    To make it clearer , cognizance is a plausible standard , a distinct truth , whereby perspectivism inquires , " Which is a more valid truth by which to set public policy , autonomic or cognizant ? " .

    Individuals are responsible for self ownership and that include its exercise through progeny .

    A bureaucratic collective representing some greater individual would be violating self ownership of individualism if as a state it were to dictate choices for progeny to individuals .


    * Fiscal Buffoonery *

    In one estimate , approximately 75% of abortions were requested by those between 0% and 200% of the poverty line , which are perhaps individuals less likely to self manage birth control behavior leading to unwanted pregnancies ; and the abortions are elective decisions given socioeconomic constraints .

    Who do anti-choice pundits believe will pay for social expenses related with mandates into poverty ; damned straight - the taxpayer !

    As per Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia , " ; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. " is remanded of bureaucratic collective institutions .

    It being that a fetus is without constitutional protections , it not having met a qualifying criteria for equal protection - birth , a fetus is private property of the mother ; therefore , which evidence is available as justification for a state to barter over a fetus as private property ?

    Is a war of attrition or some numerical incidence of under representation ensuing ?


    * Non Nomian Practices *

    Simple facts are that practicing what one preaches often requires that one understand what one is actually preaching .

    Non Nomian Truth Or Consequences Constructed Qurayshism Crossed Logic
     
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2019
  5. Porter Rockwell
    Offline

    Porter Rockwell VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2018
    Messages:
    3,492
    Thanks Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Ratings:
    +1,209
    Trump seems to believe that the United States Supreme Court will revisit Roe v. Wade and apply a different standard. I don't know if I will accept their reasoning, but it will as vague and deflective as your posts are.
     
  6. Monk-Eye
    Offline

    Monk-Eye VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2018
    Messages:
    782
    Thanks Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings:
    +160
    " Live And Let Live "

    * Succinct And Invective *
    Good luck getting around blackmum majority opinion for roe v wade , "Logically, of course, a legitimate state interest in this area need not stand or fall on acceptance of the belief that life begins at conception or at some other point prior to live birth." .

    There are many pro-choice republicans and there are many pro-choice democrats who disagree with ideological absurdities of other democrat party members .
     
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2019
  7. Porter Rockwell
    Offline

    Porter Rockwell VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2018
    Messages:
    3,492
    Thanks Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Ratings:
    +1,209
    It won't be my opinion to make.
     
  8. Monk-Eye
    Offline

    Monk-Eye VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2018
    Messages:
    782
    Thanks Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings:
    +160
    " Opining For Representation "

    * Disseminating Persuasion *
    The court of public opinion relies upon informed consent .

    Neither the right nor the left will challenge to debate the actual constitutional basis of roe v wade and the legality of abortion , as it is too much of a challenge for their base - beyond the forte of either , and each is comfortable with its insulated conventions of poorly articulated and insufficiently decisive narratives .
     
  9. Porter Rockwell
    Offline

    Porter Rockwell VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2018
    Messages:
    3,492
    Thanks Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Ratings:
    +1,209
    Did you convey something other than an opinion?
     

Share This Page