President Trump Says 'NO' To HOUSE 'Dr. Fauci' Request - Gives OK to Senate Testimony

admitted '1st Political Impeachment in US history'
Who admitted this? Just curious.

When the Democrats failed to present any crime, failed to present any evidence, and failed to present any witnesses yet voted to Impeach the President Democrats argued that Impeachment required no crime.

That's NOT what Nancy Pelosi said. She vowed they would not proceed with Impeachment unless she had 1) overwhelming undeniable evidence and 2) Bipartisanship. In the end, she had neither. Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler....
I get it, no Democrats admitted it was a political impeachment.

What exactly did Pelosi say? Did she make an actual promise or 'vow' or did she just tell her party she that she preferred to wait for 'overwhelming undeniable' evidence and bipartisanship?
 
Trump says coronavirus doc won't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance
PAGING DR. FAUCI
Trump says coronavirus doc won't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance

This is what happens when you conduct an admitted '1st Political Impeachment in US history' based on zero crime, zero evidence, and zero witnesses...when the House Intel Committee Chairman manufactures evidence and attempts to submit it as evidence while perpitratng Obstruction and committing Perjury....when the House Judiciary Committee Chairman Censures the US AG - THE TOP LAW enforcement OFFICER IN THE COUNTRY - for REFUSING TO BEREAK THER LAW...


View attachment 332289 View attachment 332290
............................................................................... "NO TESTIMONY FOR YOU!".........








.

So what gives Trump the authority to prevent anyone from testifying?
 
Trump says coronavirus doc won't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance
PAGING DR. FAUCI
Trump says coronavirus doc won't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance

This is what happens when you conduct an admitted '1st Political Impeachment in US history' based on zero crime, zero evidence, and zero witnesses...when the House Intel Committee Chairman manufactures evidence and attempts to submit it as evidence while perpitratng Obstruction and committing Perjury....when the House Judiciary Committee Chairman Censures the US AG - THE TOP LAW enforcement OFFICER IN THE COUNTRY - for REFUSING TO BEREAK THER LAW...


View attachment 332289 View attachment 332290
............................................................................... "NO TESTIMONY FOR YOU!".........








.

So what gives Trump the authority to prevent anyone from testifying?
Anything he wants to claim. Article-2 for example. If the House wants to spend months taking it to court, good luck.
Just like the faux impeachment, the House can claim "Abuse of Power", but w/o taking it to court its sour grapes.
 
Trump says coronavirus doc won't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance
PAGING DR. FAUCI
Trump says coronavirus doc won't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance

This is what happens when you conduct an admitted '1st Political Impeachment in US history' based on zero crime, zero evidence, and zero witnesses...when the House Intel Committee Chairman manufactures evidence and attempts to submit it as evidence while perpitratng Obstruction and committing Perjury....when the House Judiciary Committee Chairman Censures the US AG - THE TOP LAW enforcement OFFICER IN THE COUNTRY - for REFUSING TO BEREAK THER LAW...


View attachment 332289 View attachment 332290
............................................................................... "NO TESTIMONY FOR YOU!".........








.

So what gives Trump the authority to prevent anyone from testifying?
Anything he wants to claim. Article-2 for example. If the House wants to spend months taking it to court, good luck.
Just like the faux impeachment, the House can claim "Abuse of Power", but w/o taking it to court its sour grapes.
It’s a good look. Trump trying to cover up his own administration’s shortcomings.
 
Trump says coronavirus doc won't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance
PAGING DR. FAUCI
Trump says coronavirus doc won't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance

This is what happens when you conduct an admitted '1st Political Impeachment in US history' based on zero crime, zero evidence, and zero witnesses...when the House Intel Committee Chairman manufactures evidence and attempts to submit it as evidence while perpitratng Obstruction and committing Perjury....when the House Judiciary Committee Chairman Censures the US AG - THE TOP LAW enforcement OFFICER IN THE COUNTRY - for REFUSING TO BEREAK THER LAW...


View attachment 332289 View attachment 332290
............................................................................... "NO TESTIMONY FOR YOU!".........








.

So what gives Trump the authority to prevent anyone from testifying?
Anything he wants to claim. Article-2 for example. If the House wants to spend months taking it to court, good luck.
Just like the faux impeachment, the House can claim "Abuse of Power", but w/o taking it to court its sour grapes.
It’s a good look. Trump trying to cover up his own administration’s shortcomings.

I'm looking at it as a "Fuck You" to Nancy and the House democrats.
You can color it any way you want. Fauci and Birx are there all the time supporting Trump's response to COVID, so I'm not sure what "shortcomings" you're referring to? Most likely just a "fishing trip" looking for DNC commercial material.
 
The orange whore's habit of blocking people from testifying publicly raises the suspicion that he wants to be a despot and most likely is a criminal. He must have so much to hide.
 
The orange whore's habit of blocking people from testifying publicly raises the suspicion that he wants to be a despot and most likely is a criminal. He must have so much to hide.

Have you seen Biden circling the wagons over his pussy grabbing records? Talk about something to hide.
 
Trump says coronavirus doc won't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance
PAGING DR. FAUCI
Trump says coronavirus doc won't testify to House because they're 'haters,' OKs Senate appearance

This is what happens when you conduct an admitted '1st Political Impeachment in US history' based on zero crime, zero evidence, and zero witnesses...when the House Intel Committee Chairman manufactures evidence and attempts to submit it as evidence while perpitratng Obstruction and committing Perjury....when the House Judiciary Committee Chairman Censures the US AG - THE TOP LAW enforcement OFFICER IN THE COUNTRY - for REFUSING TO BEREAK THER LAW...


View attachment 332289 View attachment 332290
............................................................................... "NO TESTIMONY FOR YOU!".........








.

I remember that there were witnesses but they weren't allowed to testify by mcconnel. Couple links below.

 
The orange whore's habit of blocking people from testifying publicly raises the suspicion that he wants to be a despot and most likely is a criminal. He must have so much to hide.

Have you seen Biden circling the wagons over his pussy grabbing records? Talk about something to hide.

The Reade story is very, very thin. Now how about the admitted pussy-grabber, who has been sued so many times, and the sex queerdo from Indiana, both of whom hate women?
 
It is their excuse for going after someone for a blowjob.

Every time some snowflake claims Clinton was Impeached because of an affair with an Intern in the WH they expose themselves to be a radical, party-1st, reality-denying, talking points-parroting, Clinton-ass-kissing Gruber-esque snowflake sheep.

Bill Clinton was Impeached because he violated his oath of office, because he attempted to deny an Ametrican citizen her Constitutional Right to a fair trial, when he was found GUILTY of being IN CONTEMPT OF COURT for his unethical attempt to deceive the court and the jury. For his CRIME he was stripped by the Judge / Court / the Bar of his license to practice law in his home state of Arkansas.

Everyone of you snowflakes who tries to push the lie about Impeachment being about adultery has to get off your knees beside Lewinski, and remove your lips from the man's 'johnson' so you can get the BS words out of your mouth in his defense.

Clinton ws not the 1st President to have an affair, and he won't be the last. The pig sexually harassed, sexually assaulted, raped, and had adulterous affairs with women his entire career....when he wasn't at Pedo-Island having sex with kids. No one gave a damn...... What got him disbarred...and Impeached....was being found guilty of Contempt and getting his law license stripped for a time.


........none of which has anything to do with the House being BUSTED for 'the fastest rush to Impeachment in US history based on the weakest case in US history'.

Schiff was so desperate to get his hands on any evidence he could against Trump that he AUTHORED HIS OWN FALSE TRANSCRIPT of the US President's and Ukraine PM's phone call and ATTEMPTED TO SUBMIT IT AS EVIDENCE.
I can tell you dislike blowjobs also.
He loves giving them the trump.
 
The orange whore's habit of blocking people from testifying publicly raises the suspicion that he wants to be a despot and most likely is a criminal. He must have so much to hide.

Have you seen Biden circling the wagons over his pussy grabbing records? Talk about something to hide.

The Reade story is very, very thin. Now how about the admitted pussy-grabber, who has been sued so many times, and the sex queerdo from Indiana, both of whom hate women?
I hope you aren't referring to the incumbent President and Vice President of the USA?
Vegas has them winning in an EC landslide, Trump is a 2:1 favorite over Biden.

The only woman haters are the partisan democrats who were gung-ho for Blasey Ford, but who throw Tara Reade under the bus. You just know that there are more Biden accusers out there looking at the dollar signs and book deals.
 
DJT seems to delight in shitting in Nanzi's face. And that's what I hired him to do.

I'm ready to extend his contract for another 4 years.
 

Forum List

Back
Top