BluePhantom
Educator (of liberals)
My issue is that the way she describes going about it is to ammend the first ammendment and not by introducing a new constitutional ammedment.
The federal govt, congress, does not have the authority to ammed ammendments in the constitution....they must introduce new ammedments if they wish to abolish or alter a previous ammedment in some way.
As I said before: " how we added the 18th ammedment making booze illegal. To undo it we didn't alter the 18th, we added the 21st ammedment. This is how its done, not the illegal way pelosi proposes."
My guess is it would still be subject to a 2/3rds rule no matter how they tried to go about it. They could try to get shifty (and God knows they will), but I would be shocked if they could find an argument to avoid the 2/3rds requirement. They won't even get half to tell you the truth.